Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Asian or Oriental?
#41
(03-19-2017, 12:33 AM)CKwi88 Wrote: I kid you not, while I was in second year high school geography in Brazil they taught a 5 continent model. When I said that I was taught 7 continents I was looked at like I had 2 heads.

Did they use Eurasia, or did they nix Antarctica?
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
#42
(03-18-2017, 10:27 PM)Rotobeast Wrote: So.......ok.

Is it....

Oriental Massage Parlor ?
or
Asian Massage Parlor ?

Asking for a friend.
Ninja

It took 35 posts for someone to ask the obvious question.

Thank you.

And this makes it official. I am not moving, but I will be registering to fraudulently vote for you for King of Coshocton or whatever lesser office you run for, so your name better damn well be on the ballot.
JOHN ROBERTS: From time to time in the years to come, I hope you will be treated unfairly so that you will come to know the value of justice... I wish you bad luck, again, from time to time so that you will be conscious of the role of chance in life and understand that your success is not completely deserved and that the failure of others is not completely deserved either.
#43
(03-18-2017, 07:31 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Because America is in the full title of our Nation.  The United States of America.  We are a Nation of States, all united under the common flag of America.

Besides, why should people only from SE Asia get credit for being Asian? I mean, no one looks at the average Vodka chugging Cossack and thinks, "Hey, he's Asian, perhaps he could help me with my Math homework.".

Do you think of the average vodka chugging Cossack as Oriental?
#44
(03-19-2017, 10:43 AM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Do you think of the average vodka chugging Cossack as Oriental?

No, not really.  In fact, I don't even refer to people from SE Asia as Orientals.  I just thought this was a good topic that we could all have a little fun with. 
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations

-Frank Booth 1/9/23
#45
(03-19-2017, 11:00 AM)SunsetBengal Wrote: No, not really.  In fact, I don't even refer to people from SE Asia as Orientals.  I just thought this was a good topic that we could all have a little fun with. 

Mellow

(03-18-2017, 07:54 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: No, it's not.  I asked a serious question.  All I have received are canned answers.  It's not my fault if people want to deviate and have a little fun with the thread.

(03-18-2017, 08:24 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: You claim to give a serious answer, but I felt none of your heart in it.  I don't want google canned responses.  Tell me why you think it's wrong to refer to people from the Orient as Oriental.  Keep in mind, I'm an old dude and remember when folks from East Asia were just fine with the term Oriental.


Smirk
[Image: giphy.gif]
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.
#46
(03-19-2017, 11:39 AM)GMDino Wrote: Mellow




Smirk

Ok, so I was having fun with the topic. Cool
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations

-Frank Booth 1/9/23
#47
(03-19-2017, 11:40 AM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Ok, so I was having fun with the topic. Cool

[Image: giphy.gif]
[Image: giphy.gif]
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.
#48
(03-19-2017, 11:00 AM)SunsetBengal Wrote: No, not really.  In fact, I don't even refer to people from SE Asia as Orientals.  I just thought this was a good topic that we could all have a little fun with. 

The definition of the Orient has changed over time. One definition is the area east of Europe which could mean the Cossacks are Oriental or Asian depending upon which term is preferred. I think it is more common for the British to use the term Oriental and Americans to use Asian. Although I don't think there is any standard. I think it is just something that has changed over time and varies by location/culture. I think if we looked at the US Census it would probably list Asian as a category instead of Oriental. I have some trouble with Asian vs. Pacific Islander. These terms and definitions aren't set in stone and change.
#49
(03-19-2017, 08:10 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: Did they use Eurasia, or did they nix Antarctica?

I've seen the Eurasia/America/Oceania/Africa model too, but the one they were teaching was America/Europe/Asia/Africa/Oceania.
#50
(03-19-2017, 10:20 AM)xxlt Wrote: It took 35 posts for someone to ask the obvious question.

Thank you.

And this makes it official. I am not moving, but I will be registering to fraudulently vote for you for King of Coshocton or whatever lesser office you run for, so your name better damn well be on the ballot.

Look at you !
Throwing out "King", placating to my ego, and trying to throw me from my Libertarian ways.

Well played wabbit....well played.
#51
(03-19-2017, 12:45 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: The definition of the Orient has changed over time. One definition is the area east of Europe which could mean the Cossacks are Oriental or Asian depending upon which term is preferred. I think it is more common for the British to use the term Oriental and Americans to use Asian. Although I don't think there is any standard. I think it is just something that has changed over time and varies by location/culture. I think if we looked at the US Census it would probably list Asian as a category instead of Oriental. I have some trouble with Asian vs. Pacific Islander. These terms and definitions aren't set in stone and change.

This is kind of where I'm at with this.  However when I think Oriental I think China and Britain, which may explain why the term Asian is a preferred term with Asians as a descriptive? I'm not sure.  Kind of like why do some prefer Latino vs Hispanic, Black vs Negro, White vs Caucasian.  And I'm not sure what everyone prefers regarding there own ethnicity, but pretty sure what most do not prefer these days. So if I'm describing someone to somebody else, I describe as if I was describing to the police..."he looked liked a White, Black, Asian, or Latino (after reading that, I get that it could be funny, but I hope you get the gist.)  If I have more details I might say..."European or American, African or Dominican Republic, Chinese or Vietnamese. It would simply depend on the details I'm aware of.  To me it comes down to what group of people do not wish to be referred to as such.  Whites don't want to be called "cracker", and Blacks don't want to be called "negroes", and Natives don't want be called "Indians"....so on an so forth.
#52
(03-18-2017, 08:07 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Yet, Japan is still commonly referred to as the "Land of the rising sun.".

Sorry but that's New Orleans.
“History teaches that grave threats to liberty often come in times of urgency, when constitutional rights seem too extravagant to endure.”-Thurgood Marshall

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
#53
(03-20-2017, 08:49 AM)michaelsean Wrote: Sorry but that's   New Orleans.

Off topic:  Spent five days there last week (Saturday thru Wednesday).

If you/anyone ever gets a chance to go there do not hesitate...just go.  It has everything you could ever want to do.
[Image: giphy.gif]
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.
#54
(03-18-2017, 04:44 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Why is it considered bad form to refer to people from SE Asia as Oriental?  I understand that Asian is now the preferred term of reference, but I'm not sure it means what everyone intends it to mean.  When a person says "Asian", the common thought is a person of Chinese, Japanese, Korean, etc. decent.  But alas, there are more Countries in Asia, and those people look nothing like the stereotypical "Asian" person.  I mean you have people from Russia, India, and many more, and they look nothing like the people commonly associated as being Asian.

So, why can't we still use "Oriental" to differentiate?

The word Oriental itself evolved from meaning anyone East of Rome (the center of the West), so basically all of Asian, to meaning just those from Far Eastern countries (China, Korea, Japan, etc). 

Why did it go out of use? I'm not sure. New York banned the use of it in government documents and I read a transcript abut some reactions to it here:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=112465167

The Asian culture columnist for a newspaper says that it isn't necessarily an offensive term (just from the Latin word for East, so it's like saying Easterner or Westerner), but that there was some baggage attached to it from older racist campaigns of the 1800's and early 1900's. The guy basically said it's not the biggest deal that needs to be addressed, but when he personally thinks of the word he imagines incense and gongs and all of the images of Asian from the early half of the 1900's. 

I think it just fell out of use much like how Latino is becoming a preferred term over Hispanic and Black is often times more preferred than African American. Inuit is preferred over Eskimo by some people because it's not a native word and Eskimo might have derogatory origins (it might mean "eaters of raw meat" or "excommunicated" (non Christian in a negative way) ) but it might also come from a french word for using nets, lol. 

Anyone from South Asia (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka) wouldn't be considered Asian in the US or Australia as that term is mostly reserved for East Asians, but in other places they would be called Asian.


It's just one of those things that evolved in US culture. Asian has taken the place of Oriental and we use more specific terms for those from South Asian. 
[Image: ulVdgX6.jpg]

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
#55
(03-20-2017, 08:49 AM)michaelsean Wrote: Sorry but that's   New Orleans.

House of the Rising Sun is one of my top 5 songs from the 60's.
[Image: ulVdgX6.jpg]

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
#56
(03-20-2017, 10:16 AM)BmorePat87 Wrote: The word Oriental itself evolved from meaning anyone East of Rome (the center of the West), so basically all of Asian, to meaning just those from Far Eastern countries (China, Korea, Japan, etc). 

Why did it go out of use? I'm not sure. New York banned the use of it in government documents and I read a transcript abut some reactions to it here:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=112465167

The Asian culture columnist for a newspaper says that it isn't necessarily an offensive term (just from the Latin word for East, so it's like saying Easterner or Westerner), but that there was some baggage attached to it from older racist campaigns of the 1800's and early 1900's. The guy basically said it's not the biggest deal that needs to be addressed, but when he personally thinks of the word he imagines incense and gongs and all of the images of Asian from the early half of the 1900's. 

I think it just fell out of use much like how Latino is becoming a preferred term over Hispanic and Black is often times more preferred than African American. Inuit is preferred over Eskimo by some people because it's not a native word and Eskimo might have derogatory origins (it might mean "eaters of raw meat" or "excommunicated" (non Christian in a negative way) ) but it might also come from a french word for using nets, lol. 

Anyone from South Asia (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka) wouldn't be considered Asian in the US or Australia as that term is mostly reserved for East Asians, but in other places they would be called Asian.


It's just one of those things that evolved in US culture. Asian has taken the place of Oriental and we use more specific terms for those from South Asian. 


So, if I enjoyed a good time with an attractive Inuit woman, could it also be said that I indulged in Eskimo Pie? Ninja Ninja
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations

-Frank Booth 1/9/23
#57
It has to be difficult to back track on ones conspicuous racism with a depleted quiver full of horse-minded dick jokes. I'd feel sorry for an undereducated individual like this were they not proud of their overt ignorance.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
#58
(03-18-2017, 09:49 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I think it is the most Politically Correct term we can come up with to describe what used to be the Mongoloid Race, before identifying people by similar genetic traits became taboo.

Asian has become a race; as you wouldn't classify the vast majority of Israelis as Asian.

It didn't become taboo, what scientists currently do is look at similar genetic traits. What they do not do is look at a few physical traits because they got to the point where they could declare that there were no common gene clusters for the races and decided that they should stop basing things off what some eugenics toting social scientists declared hundreds of years ago before the concept of genes even existed. 
[Image: ulVdgX6.jpg]

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
#59
(03-21-2017, 09:22 AM)BmorePat87 Wrote: It didn't become taboo, what scientists currently do is look at similar genetic traits. What they do not do is look at a few physical traits because they got to the point where they could declare that there were no common gene clusters for the races and decided that they should stop basing things off what some eugenics toting social scientists declared hundreds of years ago before the concept of genes even existed. 

Science is math and hard.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
#60
I never really dug too far into this topic....Mostly because...Why? That being said I always looked at the word Oriental as being much like the word Americana. Both being works of the culture they are found in.
[Image: m6moCD1.png]







Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)