Posts: 15,116
Threads: 221
Reputation:
147378
Joined: May 2015
(09-01-2015, 03:55 PM)RoyleRedlegs Wrote: If Moore worked out, you have Chris Henry back.
If Moore didn't work, you lose nothing.
It was a smart sign. Shame something isn't clicking with the kid
I've heard a few Raiders fans say that he hasn't been the same since a few big hits he's taken.
His heart's not in it anymore.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
Posts: 5,606
Threads: 36
Reputation:
36341
Joined: May 2015
Location: Vancouver, WA
(09-01-2015, 04:22 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: I've heard a few Raiders fans say that he hasn't been the same since a few big hits he's taken.
His heart's not in it anymore.
Such a shame.
You can always trust an dishonest man to be dishonest. Honestly, it's the honest ones you have to look out for.
"Winning makes believers of us all"-Paul Brown
Posts: 1,356
Threads: 23
Reputation:
3778
Joined: May 2015
(08-31-2015, 12:34 PM)dr1441 Wrote: The things he is struggling with now are the same things he struggled with at NC. Amazingly strong guy so that bailed him out a lot at NC against college defenders but he has horrible technique and slow feet. I honestly just don't see how we go another full season with him at Center. I hope he gets better but from what he is showing so far this preseason, its going to be bad at C this year.
The Bengals seem to be really bad at selecting centers. Why is that?
Posts: 325
Threads: 7
Reputation:
933
Joined: Aug 2015
(08-31-2015, 10:57 AM)bengalfan74 Wrote: Still 5 more to go.
How is BRANDON TATE still here????????????? Dude must give great head.
Posts: 1,163
Threads: 13
Reputation:
2728
Joined: May 2015
Location: Essos
(09-01-2015, 06:23 PM)Derrick Wrote: The Bengals seem to be really bad at selecting centers. Why is that?
Bad luck, not valuing the proper attributes and metrics.
A mix of all of it.
Posts: 25,741
Threads: 647
Reputation:
241518
Joined: May 2015
Location: Jackson, OH
(09-01-2015, 06:23 PM)Derrick Wrote: The Bengals seem to be really bad at selecting centers. Why is that?
Paul Alexander.
Back when he came into the coaching ranks, the C position was one that could easily be filled by late rounders and UDFAs. When the truth of the matter is that only a few NFL day 1, starter material Centers come out of college each year. Other teams have gotten wise to that fact, and they are taking the best Centers in the early rounds. Compound that with the idea that PA may be a tad overconfident in his ability to "coach up" a guy, and make him starting material.
Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations
-Frank Booth 1/9/23
Posts: 3,742
Threads: 44
Reputation:
13919
Joined: May 2015
Location: Ohio, but with hookers and blackjack
(09-01-2015, 06:30 PM)Stormborn Wrote: Bad luck, not valuing the proper attributes and metrics.
A mix of all of it.
(09-01-2015, 07:01 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Paul Alexander.
Back when he came into the coaching ranks, the C position was one that could easily be filled by late rounders and UDFAs. When the truth of the matter is that only a few NFL day 1, starter material Centers come out of college each year. Other teams have gotten wise to that fact, and they are taking the best Centers in the early rounds. Compound that with the idea that PA may be a tad overconfident in his ability to "coach up" a guy, and make him starting material.
More so what Stormborn said.
Good centers are hard to find.
There are about 5 centers drafted a year. 2014 was an extreme outlying year with 10.
The only positions with fewer drafted players per year? Kicker, Punter, Long Snapper and Full Back.
We have never really been in a position to draft one.
The last line of what you wrote Sunset can literally only be applied to the center position. Otherwise he has one of the best track records of any coach in the league.
Posts: 16,395
Threads: 151
Reputation:
61561
Joined: May 2015
(09-01-2015, 06:29 PM)mhbsavant Wrote: How is BRANDON TATE still here????????????? Dude must give great head.
becuase dispite all the haters...
No one has stepped up to take his job.
Posts: 40,628
Threads: 1,062
Joined: May 2015
(08-31-2015, 07:31 PM)Nately120 Wrote: Moore was stuffed into the WR#1 role and they were almost always behind, and Palmer was slinging the ball nearly 40 times per game. Whoops.
Moore is only 26 years old and has only had one bad season in the NFL. His first three seasons he had over 2000 receiving yards, 17tds, and most impressively averaged almost 16 yards per catch (15.8 avg).
Moore was not the #1 WR with the Raiders, Darius Heywood-Bey was.
In 2012 when Moore had a season (51-741-7) as good as Marvin Jones 2013 season (51-712-10) the Raiders had fewer passing yards and tds than the Bengals did in 2013. But even if Moore's catches were due to high volume chances that does not explain why he was able to have such an impressive yards per catch average.
From 2011 through 2013 only 4 other WRs in the league had more receptions than Moore, more tds, and a better average per catch. (Calvin Johnson, Vincent Jackson, Jordy Nelson, Torrey Smith).
The fact that no other teams seemed interested was a cause for concern, but the Bengals have had so much success with the guys cast off by other teams That I still had high hopes for Moore. Not a star, but a solid #3/4 WR who can beat single coverage.
Posts: 3,742
Threads: 44
Reputation:
13919
Joined: May 2015
Location: Ohio, but with hookers and blackjack
(09-02-2015, 10:18 AM)XenoMorph Wrote: becuase dispite all the haters...
No one has stepped up to take his job.
They also failed at every turn to actually bring in real challengers to his job.
Mario Alford.
There. That's it.
That is literally the only challenger to his job they've brought in.
Posts: 2,696
Threads: 10
Reputation:
8480
Joined: May 2015
(09-02-2015, 10:18 AM)XenoMorph Wrote: becuase dispite all the haters...
No one has stepped up to take his job.
(09-02-2015, 12:35 PM)RoyleRedlegs Wrote: They also failed at every turn to actually bring in real challengers to his job.
Mario Alford.
There. That's it.
That is literally the only challenger to his job they've brought in.
I get the feeling the Bengals aren't too preoccupied with finding a replacement for him.
Posts: 16,395
Threads: 151
Reputation:
61561
Joined: May 2015
(09-02-2015, 12:35 PM)RoyleRedlegs Wrote: They also failed at every turn to actually bring in real challengers to his job.
Mario Alford.
There. That's it.
That is literally the only challenger to his job they've brought in.
they have had some speedy return men in camp the last few years (UDFA's)... but they never seemed to see the light of day come preseason. maybe hurt or what have you.
Posts: 69
Threads: 0
Reputation:
93
Joined: May 2015
09-02-2015, 01:27 PM
(09-01-2015, 06:29 PM)mhbsavant Wrote: How is BRANDON TATE still here????????????? Dude must give great head.
Real classy for your first post.
Posts: 3,742
Threads: 44
Reputation:
13919
Joined: May 2015
Location: Ohio, but with hookers and blackjack
(09-02-2015, 01:15 PM)XenoMorph Wrote: they have had some speedy return men in camp the last few years (UDFA's)... but they never seemed to see the light of day come preseason. maybe hurt or what have you.
Right but it goes back to they have never tried to get better at the spot. They are happy with a mediocre return guy who offers no positional value.
Posts: 2,319
Threads: 27
Joined: May 2015
Location: Western Pennsylvania
(09-02-2015, 01:44 PM)RoyleRedlegs Wrote: Right but it goes back to they have never tried to get better at the spot. They are happy with a mediocre return guy who offers no positional value.
Hey now! He's the only guy in the last exactly 47 months to average these really specific stats combined!
Posts: 3,742
Threads: 44
Reputation:
13919
Joined: May 2015
Location: Ohio, but with hookers and blackjack
(09-02-2015, 01:46 PM)djs7685 Wrote: Hey now! He's the only guy in the last exactly 47 months to average these really specific stats combined!
Lol.
Could it have to do with volume? Nah. He's just that good.
Posts: 15,116
Threads: 221
Reputation:
147378
Joined: May 2015
(09-02-2015, 01:52 PM)RoyleRedlegs Wrote: Lol.
Could it have to do with volume? Nah. He's just that good.
Don't hate. Tater has the most return yardage ever*.
*among guys named Brandon who were Bengals return men and played more than 4 years and were born in the month of October. On the 5th.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
Posts: 11,960
Threads: 103
Reputation:
81482
Joined: May 2015
(09-02-2015, 12:35 PM)RoyleRedlegs Wrote: They also failed at every turn to actually bring in real challengers to his job.
Mario Alford.
There. That's it.
That is literally the only challenger to his job they've brought in.
Plus, they gave Tate a lot of chances when they already knew who he is, which is obviously limiting any chances for the "challenger."
Posts: 3,742
Threads: 44
Reputation:
13919
Joined: May 2015
Location: Ohio, but with hookers and blackjack
(09-02-2015, 03:46 PM)McC Wrote: Plus, they gave Tate a lot of chances when they already knew who he is, which is obviously limiting any chances for the "challenger."
Bingo.
They change nothing, even at the littlest of spots and wonder why results never change
Posts: 1,201
Threads: 1
Reputation:
3336
Joined: May 2015
(09-02-2015, 03:46 PM)McC Wrote: Plus, they gave Tate a lot of chances when they already knew who he is, which is obviously limiting any chances for the "challenger."
Glad it was not just me wondering how much of a shot others were getting when Tate was out there so much. Like you said, we already know what he can do. It's not like he is going to change after these last few years. Give guys enough shots to really see what they can do. And with first team guys, not the guys that are going to be gone.
Sig compliments of ExtraRadiohead
|