Thank you trump for keeping a campaign promise

[oncemoreuntothejimbreech]

(04-06-2017, 09:54 PM)HarleyDog Wrote: Had he spent that at the bar on hookers and blow, would you not say it was better if he had donated it?

Geez!

As you and I probably know, $78k doesn't get you the same amount of hookers, blow, and golden showers it once did.

I blame the hooker and blow unions.

[GMDino]

(04-07-2017, 09:44 AM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: As you and I probably know, $78k doesn't get you the same amount of hookers, blow, and golden showers it once did.

I blame the hooker and blow unions.

You don't blame the child labor laws? 

[Belsnickel]

(04-07-2017, 08:44 AM)BmorePat87 Wrote: I don't think anyone here would have made a big deal out of this if he donated it to like the Red Cross. The fact that he slashed one department's budget and then gave them a drop in the bucket is just a joke. It's like me shooting someone 4 times, handing them a bandaid, and expecting everyone to applaud me for being so generous to them.

This is exactly right. Had he sent the check to the Red Cross, or, better yet, found a local DC charity (because let's be honest, there is a lot of need in that city and the surrounding area) and passed it on I would have been sitting here saying "bravo!" This situation, though, is like salt in a wound.

[oncemoreuntothejimbreech]

(04-07-2017, 09:51 AM)GMDino Wrote: You don't blame the child labor laws? 

Them too!

Hookers, blow, and child labor prices would be much more reasonable in a free market economy without unions and government regulations!

[Rotobeast]

(04-07-2017, 10:21 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: This is exactly right. Had he sent the check to the Red Cross, or, better yet, found a local DC charity (because let's be honest, there is a lot of need in that city and the surrounding area) and passed it on I would have been sitting here saying "bravo!" This situation, though, is like salt in a wound.

I think he did this, on purpose.
Wasn't it someone within the NP system that set up a Twitter account, after being forbidden to do so ?

[Belsnickel]

(04-07-2017, 01:44 PM)Rotobeast Wrote: I think he did this, on purpose.
Wasn't it someone within the NP system that set up a Twitter account, after being forbidden to do so ?

They were one of the first, if not the first, to have an alt account created. I think one of their parks was the first, them or the EPA. But, it was tweets from the NPS account being censored that started that whole thing, IIRC.