Posts: 1,482
Threads: 69
Reputation:
4403
Joined: May 2015
Location: Eaton OH
Mood: None
To each his own... unless you belong to a political party...
Posts: 19,106
Threads: 143
Reputation:
154056
Joined: May 2015
Location: Covington, Ky
Mood:
"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
Posts: 1,482
Threads: 69
Reputation:
4403
Joined: May 2015
Location: Eaton OH
Mood: None
(10-18-2015, 11:10 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: The ball never hit the ground on the Tate play.
Yeah. Because he didn't even have it!
To each his own... unless you belong to a political party...
Posts: 1,482
Threads: 69
Reputation:
4403
Joined: May 2015
Location: Eaton OH
Mood: None
He went to the ground without it.
To each his own... unless you belong to a political party...
Posts: 14,667
Threads: 110
Reputation:
44750
Joined: May 2015
Location: Hyborea
Mood: None
The Tate play should have been an INT. But the NFL was for some reason afraid to flat out admit their officials blew it and in the process directly caused the outcome of the game to change.
Posts: 1,482
Threads: 69
Reputation:
4403
Joined: May 2015
Location: Eaton OH
Mood: None
(10-18-2015, 11:14 PM)Joelist Wrote: The Tate play should have been an INT. But the NFL was for some reason afraid to flat out admit their officials blew it and in the process directly caused the outcome of the game to change.
LOL. They OVERTURNED the call. That is what is so bizarre here.
So, if Eifert would have flipped the ball into the air and it would have gotten picked off, it would have been a TD?
To each his own... unless you belong to a political party...
Posts: 871
Threads: 41
Reputation:
1133
Joined: Aug 2015
Mood: None
When players and even coaches don't know what a catch is anymore, something needs changed
Posts: 1,163
Threads: 13
Reputation:
2728
Joined: May 2015
Location: Essos
Mood: None
(10-18-2015, 11:14 PM)Joelist Wrote: The Tate play should have been an INT. But the NFL was for some reason afraid to flat out admit their officials blew it and in the process directly caused the outcome of the game to change.
That's twice in his career this has been a headline.
Posts: 7,747
Threads: 127
Reputation:
50163
Joined: May 2015
Location: Cincinnati
Mood: None
Because refs have no idea what a catch is.
How else can you explain the fact that Bills #85 can drag the ball across the ground and still have it called a catch, but Eifert can catch it and get into the end zone with possession before losing it to the ground and it not be a catch.
Posts: 59
Threads: 0
Reputation:
115
Joined: Sep 2015
Location: San Diego CA
Mood: None
incompetence? inconsistency? bias? controlling the game?
take your pick, all are so prevalent you can't lose
Posts: 4,711
Threads: 166
Reputation:
6330
Joined: May 2015
Mood:
(10-18-2015, 11:03 PM)EatonFan Wrote: http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000559663/article/dean-blandino-on-why-golden-tate-play-ruled-a-td
http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2015092707/2015/REG3/bengals@ravens#menu=gameinfo|contentId%3A0ap3000000541000&tab=videos
How are these two plays called differently?
Not a catch. No way he showed he had complete possession or had control long enough be considered a runner. Eifert's was more of a catch and TD than Tate's ever will be.
Posts: 5,548
Threads: 199
Reputation:
25210
Joined: May 2015
Location: Boise, ID
Mood: None
Wow, the Eifert calling and the Tate calling are so contradictory. They really need to figure this out, and fast.
In my opinion, the Eifert catch was more of a catch than that Tate play. I don't see how he was any more of a runner than Eifert was. We shouldn't be surprised though, the refs this year have been terrible.
Posts: 4,302
Threads: 7
Reputation:
15106
Joined: Jun 2015
Mood:
Aliens.
Our father, who art in Hell
Unhallowed, be thy name
Cursed be thy sons and daughters
Of our nemesis who are to blame
Thy kingdom come, Nema
Posts: 296
Threads: 0
Reputation:
446
Joined: May 2015
Mood: None
(10-18-2015, 11:31 PM)zygrot24 Wrote: When players and even coaches don't know what a catch is anymore, something needs changed
Exactly. It is getting ridiculous the amount of rules and drama in the NFL. Hopefully at some point a new commish will come along and right some wrongs from the Goodell era.
Posts: 1,308
Threads: 139
Reputation:
4377
Joined: May 2015
Location: Indianapolis
Mood: None
I dont even pretend to try and know what constitutes a NFL catch, once the referees go under the hood its a 50/50 crap shoot!
"We have been sentenced to life in the prison that is a Bengals fan and we are going to serve out our time"
Posts: 11,915
Threads: 212
Reputation:
54048
Joined: May 2015
Location: Lancaster, PA
Mood: None
(10-18-2015, 11:03 PM)EatonFan Wrote: http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000559663/article/dean-blandino-on-why-golden-tate-play-ruled-a-td
http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2015092707/2015/REG3/bengals@ravens#menu=gameinfo|contentId%3A0ap3000000541000&tab=videos
How are these two plays called differently?
Here's my problem with the Tate call: if that happened anywhere else on the field it would be ruled an INT, not a catch and fumble. Yet, somehow in this instance it's a catch and fumble.
Posts: 1,482
Threads: 69
Reputation:
4403
Joined: May 2015
Location: Eaton OH
Mood: None
(10-19-2015, 08:42 AM)PhilHos Wrote: Here's my problem with the Tate call: if that happened anywhere else on the field it would be ruled an INT, not a catch and fumble. Yet, somehow in this instance it's a catch and fumble.
Along with Tate falling to the ground without the football. Like I said in the OP... How can these be called so differently when it's almost an identical play? They both caught the ball and crossed the goal line. Both are TDs IMHO.
If anything, Tate's is a bit more iffy.
To each his own... unless you belong to a political party...
Posts: 19,106
Threads: 143
Reputation:
154056
Joined: May 2015
Location: Covington, Ky
Mood:
(10-19-2015, 11:19 PM)EatonFan Wrote: Along with Tate falling to the ground without the football. Like I said in the OP... How can these be called so differently when it's almost an identical play? They both caught the ball and crossed the goal line. Both are TDs IMHO.
If anything, Tate's is a bit more iffy.
Tate was in the end zone when he caught the ball and he wasn't going to the ground as he made the catch. Once he has control and the 2nd foot down--in the end zone--play over, touchdown.
Eifert was in the field of play as he was gaining possession and stretched the ball out, over the end zone line, as he was going to the ground. Since he was going to the ground with possession of the ball, he has to complete the catch.
"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
Posts: 1,482
Threads: 69
Reputation:
4403
Joined: May 2015
Location: Eaton OH
Mood: None
(10-20-2015, 12:16 AM)rfaulk34 Wrote: Tate was in the end zone when he caught the ball and he wasn't going to the ground as he made the catch. Once he has control and the 2nd foot down--in the end zone--play over, touchdown.
Eifert was in the field of play as he was gaining possession and stretched the ball out, over the end zone line, as he was going to the ground. Since he was going to the ground with possession of the ball, he has to complete the catch.
Eifert had full control of the ball BEFORE he stretched it over the goal line. This makes him a runner. It's a TD. The going to the ground does not matter.
Tate also went to the ground... without the ball.
To each his own... unless you belong to a political party...
Posts: 19,106
Threads: 143
Reputation:
154056
Joined: May 2015
Location: Covington, Ky
Mood:
(10-20-2015, 12:19 AM)EatonFan Wrote: Eifert had full control of the ball BEFORE he stretched it over the goal line. This makes him a runner. It's a TD. The going to the ground does not matter.
Tate also went to the ground... without the ball.
It DOES matter because it's a rule. Him going to the ground was a fluid motion as he was catching the ball. He didn't catch it, take steps (establishing a catch) and then go to the ground while being tackled. It was one continuous motion.
"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
|
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
![[Image: oN5QAdY.png]](https://i.imgur.com/oN5QAdY.png)
![[Image: giphy.gif]](http://media1.giphy.com/media/9EmYYw6o9cmsM/giphy.gif)
