Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
HGH use is rampant in NFL
#1
I don't trust the Bleacher Report, but it makes sense. The percentages are wild, saying 10-40% are on HGH.

I can make a guess who uses it/has used it on our team.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2602986-players-say-the-nfl-has-an-hgh-problem-even-if-peyton-manning-isnt-part-of-it
[Image: 43325991030_4d39723a8f.jpg]
Reply/Quote
#2
Would you take a supplement to change your family tree with generational wealth?
Reply/Quote
#3
Only 10 to 40%?
[Image: Cz_eGI3UUAASnqC.jpg]
Reply/Quote
#4
(01-01-2016, 04:48 PM)6andcounting Wrote: Only 10 to 40%?

Even if it's "only" 10%, on a typical 53 man roster, that's 5 guys.

5 guys X 32 team league = 160 players.





[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
Reply/Quote
#5
(01-01-2016, 05:24 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: Even if it's "only" 10%, on a typical 53 man roster, that's 5 guys.

5 guys X 32 team league = 160 players.
There's no way 1,100 players aren't using it. The NFL didn't even test for it until last year.
[Image: Cz_eGI3UUAASnqC.jpg]
Reply/Quote
#6
(01-01-2016, 05:47 PM)6andcounting Wrote: There's no way 1,100 players aren't using it. The NFL didn't even test for it until last year.

Copy that. I thought you were saying it wasn't very significant if it was only 10-40%.





[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
Reply/Quote
#7
(01-01-2016, 08:07 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: Copy that. I thought you were saying it wasn't very significant if it was only 10-40%.

Well, try being smarter next time.
[Image: Cz_eGI3UUAASnqC.jpg]
Reply/Quote
#8
(01-01-2016, 10:05 PM)6andcounting Wrote: Well, try being smarter next time.

I'll work on that... Mellow





[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
Reply/Quote
#9
(12-31-2015, 09:02 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Would you take a supplement to change your family tree with generational wealth?

It depends on how legal it is and how dangerous it could be.  
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
#10
(01-02-2016, 01:06 AM)Nately120 Wrote: It depends on how legal it is and how dangerous it could be.  

True dat.  I could certainly change my family tree and generational wealth by supplementing my days with crack and/or heroin, but I don't think I will.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
#11
(01-02-2016, 02:02 PM)jfkbengals Wrote: True dat.  I could certainly change my family tree and generational wealth by supplementing my days with crack and/or heroin, but I don't think I will.

I was picturing a billionaire with a revolver saying "There is one bullet in here...I'll give your family $1 million for each time you pull the trigger" or something to that effect.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
#12
HGH is totally different from anabolic steroids. HGH has almost none of the negative side effects that steroids do
Reply/Quote
#13
(01-01-2016, 05:24 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: Even if it's "only" 10%, on a typical 53 man roster, that's 5 guys.

5 guys X 32 team league = 160 players.

Im willing to bet almost 50-60% have taken it at some point maybe not at the NFL level but HS or College.
Reply/Quote
#14
(01-07-2016, 12:42 PM)XenoMorph Wrote: Im willing to bet almost 50-60% have taken it at some point maybe not at the NFL level but HS or College.

I'd guess higher than that.  Even guys who don't use it on a regular basis take it to recover from injuries.
Reply/Quote





Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)