Hey, Barry, GTFO!

[*bfine32*]

(01-20-2017, 03:29 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: That is pretty much an ideological split. I mean, found not guilty of aiding the enemy, plead guilty to many of the charges, didn't flee like some others. I can understand disagreeing with it, but it's far from traitorous. That is just biased hyperbole.

He who is not guilty of partisan hyperbole cast the first stone.

Manning was found guilty of espinoge against her country; I suppose folks can debate if that was treasonist or not.

As to the communication of the sentance. I don't have much of a problem with it; as she has already served 6 years and was not pardoned.

WTS, she'll have more money than this forum combined within a year of her release.

[*wildcats forever*]

Let's take a breath now, and thoughtfully consider the next reply. Slinging insults is not going to end well, I promise.

[hollodero]

(01-20-2017, 03:16 PM)McC Wrote: She's a traitor too.  Barry spent eight years trying to destroy America and her mission was to finish us off.  You might be too brainwashed to see it.  That doesn't mean it ain't real.  

Oh that's a beauty. 

- You're right I guess. I just didn't see! Guess I just focused too much on the question "Why... why would they want to destroy the USA, why?" instead of clearly seeing the aimlessness of pure evil which is the Democratic Party. 

Europe now only calls you the sick man between the oceans. Thanks Obama. You're now a pathetic third world country and a laughingstock. How did that happen. But of course: Because Obama hates the USA! It's so obvious. We were just too brainwashed by logic and consistency to see it.

You people who see, you are the salt of the earth.

[*wildcats forever*]

(01-20-2017, 03:54 PM)hollodero Wrote: Oh that's a beauty. 

- You're right I guess. I just didn't see! Guess I just focused too much on the question "Why... why would they want to destroy the USA, why?" instead of clearly seeing the aimlessness of pure evil which is the Democratic Party. 

Europe now only calls you the sick man between the oceans. Thanks Obama. You're now a pathetic third world country and a laughingstock. How did that happen. But of course: Because Obama hates the USA! It's so obvious. We were just too brainwashed by logic and consistency to see it.

You people who see, you are the salt of the earth.

The one thing I see is the need for our new administration to preside in the best interests of all people, not just the ones who supported them. Show me that, and I will breathe a bit easier .....

[Belsnickel]

(01-20-2017, 03:48 PM)bfine32 Wrote: He who is not guilty of partisan hyperbole cast the first stone.

Manning was found guilty of espinoge against her country; I suppose folks can debate if that was treasonist or not.

As to the communication of the sentance. I don't have much of a problem with it; as she has already served 6 years and was not pardoned.

WTS, she'll have more money than this forum combined within a year of her release.

I was referring to Obama's commutation of the sentence being traitorous, as that was one of the reasons being used to call Obama a traitor. I consider Manning's actions to be traitorous, but not Obama's commutation. Much like you, since it wasn't a pardon, and because of my aforementioned reasons, I'm okay with it.

And yes, Manning is going to be rolling in money. She will capitalize on her story and make buttloads.

[RICHMONDBENGAL_07]

(01-20-2017, 02:53 AM)McC Wrote: Don't let the door hit you where Allah split you.

Love the Muslim implication, that's hilarious.   Do I really need the sarcasm emoji?

[BmorePat87]

We're truly a better nation now than we were before he entered office.

Time for Trump to save us from the "carnage" and help "rebuild".

[*Nately120*]

(01-20-2017, 02:53 AM)McC Wrote: Don't let the door hit you where Allah split you.

Wait, are you saying Allah was actually the one who created mankind? On a lighter note, the republicans I know who aren't married to their cousins are actually lamenting their wish to have "anyone in the White House other than Obama."

[*bfine32*]

(01-21-2017, 12:13 AM)Nately120 Wrote: Wait, are you saying Allah was actually the one who created mankind?

I know that's what I'm saying.

[GMDino]

(01-20-2017, 02:53 AM)McC Wrote: Don't let the door hit you where Allah split you.

(01-21-2017, 12:13 AM)Nately120 Wrote: Wait, are you saying Allah was actually the one who created mankind?  On a lighter note, the republicans I know who aren't married to their cousins are actually lamenting their wish to have "anyone in the White House other than Obama."

(01-21-2017, 12:19 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I know that's what I'm saying.

[*bfine32*]

(01-21-2017, 12:25 PM)GMDino Wrote:

I suppose you thought you had a point

[GMDino]

(01-21-2017, 12:28 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I suppose you thought you had a point

I suppose you never said not to get involved in other's conversations? 

[xxlt]

(01-20-2017, 03:46 PM)Yojimbo Wrote: The
I'm on the left but I don't support either Obama or Clinton because they are neo-liberals, which is just a new way to describe what used to be moderate republicans.

I don't play the political football game of "my team's always right and your team's always wrong". That's what the two most powerful political parties want us doing, so we're not paying attention to how democrats and republicans are both screwing us.

Good take, although you could almost replace the word moderate with conservative. 

[CageTheBengal]

(01-20-2017, 02:53 AM)McC Wrote: Don't let the door hit you where Allah split you.

You are incredibly anti-patriotic and your opinions have been deluded by whatever right wing radio host/"new group" you worship. I hope you seek help.

[*bfine32*]

(01-21-2017, 12:29 PM)GMDino Wrote: I suppose you never said not to get involved in other's conversations? 

Where the hell did I ever say that? I know I've said it is good practice to address the point being discussed if you choose to do so.

But don't let that stop you from policing my posts.

[xxlt]

(01-20-2017, 04:05 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: I was referring to Obama's commutation of the sentence being traitorous, as that was one of the reasons being used to call Obama a traitor. I consider Manning's actions to be traitorous, but not Obama's commutation. Much like you, since it wasn't a pardon, and because of my aforementioned reasons, I'm okay with it.

And yes, Manning is going to be rolling in money. She will capitalize on her story and make buttloads.

Boatloads. Boatloads. It's boatloads. The only people making buttloads are doing so in the privacy of their own sex lives or they work in porn. Now maybe she will work in porn, but those buttloads are not buttloads of money. Similarly the money shot in porno is not a picture of money. 

Sorry bro, but this is one of my pet peeves. 

[*jason*]

(01-20-2017, 04:15 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: We're truly a better nation now than we were before he entered office.

Time for Trump to save us from the "carnage" and help "rebuild".

In fairness, I haven't seen any gang activity going on around me since his speech. Good job Mr. Trump.

[GMDino]

(01-21-2017, 12:32 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Where the hell did I ever say that? I know I've said it is good practice to address the point being discussed if you choose to do so.

But don't let that stop you from policing my posts.

(01-06-2017, 05:16 PM)bfine32 Wrote: My apologies I thought we were keeping it within the context of me and the person I replied to; I forgot to include the whole world. My bad.

(01-06-2017, 05:32 PM)GMDino Wrote: My bad.  Thought it was just a general response on a public message board, not a conversation between two members.

(01-06-2017, 05:54 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Oh, I understand; You don't know the purpose behind the quote function. Allow me to shed light inside of cursing your darkness:

Poster A: Taking away free birth control will cost the government money

Poster B (replies directly to poster A: How will taking away free birth control will cost the government money?

Poster C (replies directly to Poster B): You do know planned Parenthood does more than abortions don't you....and then something about hating women

Poster B (replies directly to Poster C) WTF, does that have to do with what we are talking about?

Poster D (replies to Poster B): Republicans what to defund planned Parenthood

Poster B (replies to poster D): WTF, does that have to do with what we are talking about?

Poster D: I'm just saying


All the while Poster B does not get his question answered, just insulted. 

[*bfine32*]

(01-21-2017, 12:54 PM)GMDino Wrote:

Thanks for illustrating my point especially the last example where I spelled out how it is good practice to stick to the subject being discussed if you want to interject. 

But as I said, do not let this failed attempt deter you from your duties of policing of my posts. I think between you and the rest of the gotcha gang you're doing a fine job and catch most of them. 

[*wildcats forever*]

It seems the topic of the OP has been exhausted, and now everyone is just picking at each other. Way to go, guys. If that's how you want to treat this forum, and ignore the COC - fine. Carry this over into future threads, we'll deal with it on a one-on-one basis from here on out.

/thread.