How investigators handled Curtis Hill, his accusers differently

[GMDino]

You may not know the story, you may not care.

But this is an interesting look into how the people in charge handled investigating accusations of four women against one man.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/nation-now/2018/11/20/indiana-attorney-general-curtis-hill-treated-differently-during-investigation-suzette-hackney-writes/2053016002/

tl;dr

He was allowed to submit a video from an office with only his lawyer asking questions. 

The women were interviewed by three to four people (multiple times) and asked to physically show how they were groped/touched.  One was asked to draw a picture of a martini glass to prove she knew what one of the other victims was drinking when she witnessed the event.  

Good read though.  I suggest going all the way through it.

[Dill]

(11-20-2018, 12:40 PM)GMDino Wrote: You may not know the story, you may not care.

But this is an interesting look into how the people in charge handled investigating accusations of four women against one man.

A GOOD MAN, I might add, a Republican family man with five children, whose career and home life are on the line now because four women who hang out in bars stepped forward to accuse this friendly public servant whom everyone loves of groping them. One of whom was the director of communications for the Democrats in the state senate.  Of course she knows what a martini glass looks like. Most of the many witnesses who saw him grope the women are also Dems.  Nuff said.

https://www.in.gov/attorneygeneral/files/ADMINISTRATIVE.AG%20Hill%20Long%20Bio.08.31.MG.pdf

Ok, ok, so even if he did grope them and say the things he did--do we really want to ruin an AG's life and marriage because he broke the law?