(12-09-2023, 01:21 PM)pally Wrote: there is no statute of limitations if tax forms were not filed for a year or if fraud has been committed
Again, read the indictment. There is a statute of limitations.
In his transcribed interview, U.S. Attorney Weiss confirmed that the Biden Justice
Department allowed the statute of limitations for the 2014 and 2015 tax year charges to expire.
https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/judiciary.house.gov/files/2023-12-05-The-Justice-Department-s-Deviations-from-Standard-Processes-in-its-Investigation-of-Hunter-Biden.pdf.
This is a great read and contains the factual testimony under oath of 2 high level whistle blowers. If you want the truth, here it is. It is a long document but outlines how the DOJ stonewalled the HB investigation and also stopped any investigation into Joe Biden.
FBI bureaucrats impeded the investigation into Hunter Biden by slow-walking investigative action and withholding relevant information.
Senior officials in the Delaware U.S. Attorney’s Office attempted to avoid learning information that could implicate President Biden in criminal activity.
The Delaware U.S. Attorney’s Office continually sought to keep the Biden name out of the investigation
Prosecutors in Weiss’s office allowed the statute of limitations for some of Hunter Biden’s most serious crimes to lapse.
In late 2021, Special Agent Ziegler compiled a Special Agent Report (SAR) that
recommended prosecuting Hunter Biden for tax crimes related to the 2014 and 2015 tax years.191
Ziegler confirmed in his SAR that “AUSA Wolf has reviewed the appendices and the charges
cited in this report and agrees with the prosecution recommendation of the above cited charges
against [Robert Hunter Biden
During his transcribed interview, Shapley testified that the Biden Justice Department
allowed the statute of limitations to lapse on the 2014 and 2015 tax crimes.195 Specifically,
Shapley stated that up until a meeting he attended with Weiss on October 7, 2022, he believed,
based on statements made by Attorney General Garland and Weiss, that prosecutors “were
deciding whether to charge 2014 and 2015 tax violations.”196 During this period, Shapley
explained, prosecutors and Hunter Biden’s legal team entered into agreements to toll the statute
of limitations for crimes pertaining to the 2014 and 2015 tax years.197 However, despite the
defense counsel’s willingness to toll the statute of limitations on the charges again, the Biden
Justice Department ultimately allowed the statute of limitations to lapse on those years in
November 2022.
198 Shapley cited this decision as yet another example of the Biden Justice
Department disregarding established norms to benefit Hunter Biden, explaining that “[l]etting a
statute of limitations expire in an active criminal investigation is not normal.”
As Shapley and Ziegler described in their testimony to Congress, the possible felony
charges against Hunter Biden for the 2014 and 2015 tax years involved “the most substantive
criminal conduct.”176 Those tax years involved income from Hunter Biden’s position on the
board of directors of Burisma Holdings, and most importantly, connected Joe Biden’s actions as
Vice President to his son’s alleged criminal conduct.
Hunter Biden served on the board of directors of Burisma from April 2014 until April
2019.177 During Hunter Biden’s tenure, Burisma paid him up to $1 million annually, though it cut
his salary two months after his father left office.
178 While Hunter Biden served on the board,
Burisma and its founder and owner, Mykola Zlochevsky, were under investigation by the
Ukrainian government.179 According to one Burisma executive, Burisma hired Hunter Biden
specifically to “protect us, through his dad, from all kinds of problems.”180 Burisma executives
explicitly asked Hunter Biden to help alleviate the “government pressure from Ukrainian
Government investigations into Mykola, et cetera.”181 In response, Hunter Biden “called
D.C.”182 The Ukrainian government soon fired the investigating Prosecutor General, Viktor
Shokin, “after then-Vice President Joe Biden threatened to pull $1 billion in U.S. aid” earmarked
for Ukraine if Shokin remained in office.183 Notably, then-Vice President Biden unilaterally
decided to change U.S. policy regarding the loan during a plane ride to Ukraine.
184
According to evidence discovered by IRS investigators, one way in which Hunter Biden
evaded paying taxes on his income from Burisma was by having it sent to the bank account of a
company he co-owned with his business partner and then distributing the money to himself while
falsely telling the IRS that the distribution was a nontaxable loan.185 Shapley explained that this
was a “textbook” affirmative scheme by Hunter Biden to avoid paying taxes.186 In basic terms, as
Ziegler put it, “you can’t loan yourself your own money. It just doesn’t make any sense.”187
Notably, with respect to this particular scheme, IRS investigators could find no evidence
typically needed to verify that a given payment is, in fact, a loan.188 However, when Shapley
informed Tax Division trial attorney Jack Morgan that there was no such evidence, Morgan
replied that “this is not a typical case” due to the fact that it involved President Biden’s son.189
Email correspondence between Hunter Biden and his business associate Eric Schwerin sheds
additional light on this scheme.