Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
If we win...
#1
...there will be 11 teams left without a Super Bowl win:

Vikings: 0-4
Bills: 0-4
Falcons: 0-2
Panthers: 0-2
Cardinals: 0-1
Titans: 0-1
Chargers: 0-1
Browns
Lions
Jags
Texans

Also, now that our playoff win drought is over, here's the longest streaks now:

Lions: 30 years
Dolphins: 21 years
Raiders: 18 years
Redskins: 16 years
Jets: 11 years
Bears: 11 years
Giants: 10 years

The NFL record is held by the Cardinals at 38 years (1960 to 1998).
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
Reply/Quote
#2
When* we win. Wink
Reply/Quote
#3
(02-04-2022, 04:18 PM)Pezmerga Wrote: When* we win. Wink

Rock On
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
Reply/Quote
#4
(02-04-2022, 04:08 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: ...there will be 11 teams left without a Super Bowl win:

Vikings: 0-4
Bills: 0-4
Falcons: 0-2
Panthers: 0-2
Cardinals: 0-1
Titans: 0-1
Chargers: 0-1
Browns
Lions
Jags
Texans

Also, now that our playoff win drought is over, here's the longest streaks now:

Lions: 30 years
Dolphins: 21 years
Raiders: 18 years
Redskins: 16 years
Jets: 11 years
Bears: 11 years
Giants: 10 years

The NFL record is held by the Cardinals at 38 years (1960 to 1998).

For all the talk of NFL parity, it sure doesn't show in championships. MLB has 1/2 the teams without a championship than the NFL despite decidedly more unfair payroll rules. They also only have 1 team to never appear in a World Series compared to the NFL's 4, and only 3 that haven't been to multiple compared to the NFL's 9.

Just was kind of surprised seeing that because the talk is always about parity.
____________________________________________________________

[Image: jamarr-chase.gif]
Reply/Quote
#5
If we win we will have gone from the team with the longest stretch since they're last playoff when to the team with the most recent win. If this happens I may just have to bring this up in random conversation with people for a year. Who Dey!!!
Reply/Quote
#6
(02-04-2022, 04:08 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: ...there will be 11 teams left without a Super Bowl win:

Vikings: 0-4
Bills: 0-4
Falcons: 0-2
Panthers: 0-2
Cardinals: 0-1
Titans: 0-1
Chargers: 0-1
Browns
Lions
Jags
Texans

Also, now that our playoff win drought is over, here's the longest streaks now:

Lions: 30 years
Dolphins: 21 years
Raiders: 18 years
Redskins: 16 years
Jets: 11 years
Bears: 11 years
Giants: 10 years

The NFL record is held by the Cardinals at 38 years (1960 to 1998).
I live in LA and honestly the "LA Rams " have never won, it was St Louis Rams. Thats how I see it anyway. 
Also there should be a list of teams that have yet to even be in a Superbowl, off top of my head:

Browns
Lions
Jags
Texans
Reply/Quote
#7
(02-04-2022, 04:35 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: For all the talk of NFL parity, it sure doesn't show in championships. MLB has 1/2 the teams without a championship than the NFL despite decidedly more unfair payroll rules. They also only have 1 team to never appear in a World Series compared to the NFL's 4, and only 3 that haven't been to multiple compared to the NFL's 9.

Just was kind of surprised seeing that because the talk is always about parity.

Oh. Every time I hear that, I thought it was about "parody".
#WhoDey
#RuleTheJungle
#TheyGottaPlayUs
#WeAreYourSuperBowl



Reply/Quote
#8
(02-04-2022, 04:35 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: For all the talk of NFL parity, it sure doesn't show in championships. MLB has 1/2 the teams without a championship than the NFL despite decidedly more unfair payroll rules. They also only have 1 team to never appear in a World Series compared to the NFL's 4, and only 3 that haven't been to multiple compared to the NFL's 9.

Just was kind of surprised seeing that because the talk is always about parity.

That's always been the dirty little secret with the NFL. You hear that parity word used more in reference to the NFL than any other league, yet you have 12 teams (hopefully 11 in a couple weeks) without a championship.

An even more amazing stat is that a whopping 30 of the 55 Super Bowls have been won by 6 teams.

Patriots - 6 in 11 appearances
Steelers - 6 of 8
Cowboys - 5 of 8
49ers - 5 of 7
Packers - 4 of 5
Giants - 4 of 5

Then you also have

Broncos - 3 of 8
Raiders - 3 of 5
Redskins/Football Team - 3 of 5

So these 9 teams have accounted for 39 of the 55 championships (71%) and 62 of the 110 appearances (56%).

You have 9 teams with at least 3 rings, and 12 teams with 0.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
Reply/Quote
#9
(02-04-2022, 04:43 PM)kalibengal Wrote: I live in LA and honestly the "LA Rams " have never won, it was St Louis Rams. Thats how I see it anyway. 
Also there should be a list of teams that have yet to even be in a Superbowl, off top of my head:

Browns
Lions
Jags
Texans

How was it during the "Greatest Show on Turf" days?  I mean, were there any LA Rams fans still rocking the gear, or were the Rams dead as far as those fans were concerned?  
“We're 2-7!  What the **** difference does it make?!” - Bruce Coslet
Reply/Quote
#10
If the Oilers made it to the SB (they didn't), who'd get credit...the Titans or Texans?
-The only bengals fan that has never set foot in Cincinnati 1-15-22
Reply/Quote
#11
(02-04-2022, 04:58 PM)basballguy Wrote: If the Oilers made it to the SB (they didn't), who'd get credit...the Titans or Texans?

Titans hold all of the Oilers past records and team history.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
Reply/Quote
#12
(02-04-2022, 04:55 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: That's always been the dirty little secret with the NFL. You hear that parity word used more in reference to the NFL than any other league, yet you have 12 teams (hopefully 11 in a couple weeks) without a championship.

An even more amazing stat is that a whopping 30 of the 55 Super Bowls have been won by 6 teams.

Patriots - 6 in 11 appearances
Steelers - 6 of 8
Cowboys - 5 of 8
49ers - 5 of 7
Packers - 4 of 5
Giants - 4 of 5

Then you also have

Broncos - 3 of 8
Raiders - 3 of 5
Redskins/Football Team - 3 of 5

So these 9 teams have accounted for 39 of the 55 championships (71%) and 62 of the 110 appearances (56%).

You have 9 teams with at least 3 rings, and 12 teams with 0.

Green Bay Packers have 13 Championships.

Championships did not start in 1966 because the NFL absorbed 8 AFL teams.  Smirk
[Image: 4540978331_3e8fe35323.jpg]
Reply/Quote
#13
(02-04-2022, 05:01 PM)BengalYankee Wrote: Green Bay Packers have 13 Championships.

Championships did not start in 1966 because the NFL absorbed 8 AFL teams.  Smirk

Cue Browns fans and their 8 championships
-The only bengals fan that has never set foot in Cincinnati 1-15-22
Reply/Quote
#14
(02-04-2022, 05:01 PM)BengalYankee Wrote: Green Bay Packers have 13 Championships.

Championships did not start in 1966 because the NFL absorbed 8 AFL teams.  Smirk

Just talking Super Bowl championships.

Otherwise, the Browns and Lions even won old NFL titles.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
Reply/Quote
#15
(02-04-2022, 05:03 PM)basballguy Wrote: Cue Browns fans and their 8 championships

They do have 8 parades/championships. Otherwise we need to get rid of anything in the Hall of Fame before 1966. Which is stupid.
[Image: 4540978331_3e8fe35323.jpg]
Reply/Quote
#16
As I understand, the records always follow the franchise. The Browns/Ravens are the soul exception. If you look at the Titans' media guide their records include the Oilers.

I... When we pull this off it will be one of the great stories in NFL history. Will it into existence.
Reply/Quote
#17
(02-04-2022, 05:04 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Just talking Super Bowl championships.

Otherwise, the Browns and Lions even won old NFL titles.

Like I said ...

Otherwise we need to get rid of anything in the Hall of Fame before 1966. Which is stupid.
[Image: 4540978331_3e8fe35323.jpg]
Reply/Quote
#18
(02-04-2022, 05:08 PM)BengalYankee Wrote: Like I said ...

Otherwise we need to get rid of anything in the Hall of Fame before 1966. Which is stupid.

Imo, players should be acknowledged who paved the way, but the NFL was just to unstable from 1920 to 1966 to take those championships seriously.

You had dozens upon dozens of teams who played a season, then folded. Team mergers. Multiple league mergers. Etc.

The league didn't start to resemble what we see now until the Super Bowl era, followed quickly by the AFL/NFL merger.

So I (like many) choose to just look at that. That's why you see so many records say "since the merger" or "during the SB era".

No disrespect to past teams/players. It's just that the league was a mess in it's formative years.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
Reply/Quote
#19
(02-04-2022, 04:23 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Rock On

First thing I noticed when I saw the thread! 

It's OURS!


We're going into LA and making it The Jungle!



WHO-DEY!
Reply/Quote
#20
56 years of Superbowls is honestly still a super small sample size. I really don't think you will get the parity statistic the NFL wants until 150-200 years
[Image: 1500x500]
Reply/Quote





Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)