Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
New Israeli Government: "Like Mitch and AOC"?
#1
Not a done deal yet--the confirming vote is next Thursday--but it looks like Netanyahu is out.
So what will Israeli politics be like now--paralysis, return to the center, or new boss the same as the old Boss?

I choose to lead with this article for its illuminating analogy to U.S. politics.

Strange Political Bedfellows: Why the Israeli right and left are teaming up to unseat Benjamin Netanyahu.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/03/briefing/israel-coalition-netanyahu-bennett.html

On ideological grounds, the Israeli coalition that’s on the verge of ending Benjamin Netanyahu’s long tenure as prime minister does not make a lot of sense.

It includes eight parties, drawn from the hard right, the left and the center — and one Arab party. A more intuitive governing coalition would have comprised only of parties on the right, which together hold a slim majority of Israel’s Parliament.

The largest of the conservative parties, by far, is Likud, which Netanyahu leads. As the prime minister for the past 12 years, he has accomplished much of what the Israeli right has long wanted. He has supported Jewish settlements in heavily Palestinian areas, stepped back from the peace process and reduced the chances of a two-state solution.

Yet many of his allies, led by Naftali Bennett, who once worked as Netanyahu’s chief of staff, are dumping him to work with a coalition that includes social democrats and greens (and an Islamic party). It would be akin to Mitch McConnell abandoning Donald Trump to work with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Chuck Schumer — and Ocasio-Cortez and Schumer saying yes.

Like Mitch and A.O.C.  The McConnell-Trump analogy turns out to be quite useful for understanding Israeli politics.

Netanyahu — like Trump, his ally in global affairs — is the subject of serious allegations of abuse of government. Prosecutors indicted Netanyahu on corruption charges in 2019, and the trial has been delayed partly because of Covid-19 restrictions. The indictment accuses him of altering policies to benefit businessmen, in exchange for a combination of favorable media coverage and nearly $300,000 in gifts. He has denied the charges and called them an attempt by unelected bureaucrats to force him from office.

His attempts to fend off the charges and remain in power have left many Israelis worried about a collapse in judicial independence and the rule of law, much as Democrats were anxious about Trump’s norm-breaking, . . .  But there is also a big difference: While Republicans have overwhelmingly stood by Trump, a meaningful number of Netanyahu’s ideological allies have chosen to break with him.

Yifat Shasha-Biton, whose conservative New Hope party is in the coalition that is set to take power, recently said that Netanyahu told “lies without blinking” and was “setting Israel on the path to one-man rule.” Isabel Kershner ... said many right-wing politicians see Netanyahu “as no longer fit to rule.”

Another factor is that many on the political right feel more secure about Israel’s approach to Palestinian issues than in the past. They no longer fear that major compromises to achieve a two-state solution are imminent. “They can afford to step back,” Makovsky said.

Will Netanyahu return?

The parliamentary math means that the right-wing parties have to make the hard choice between sticking with Netanyahu and finding partners from the center and the left. There is no conservative majority without Netanyahu’s Likud party — and there are large ideological differences between the right and the center-left, especially on Palestinian issues.

Those differences help explain why it took so long to arrive at last night’s outcome. Israel has held four elections since 2019, with the first three ending in failed attempts to form a lasting government.

“The political crisis in Israel is unprecedented on a global level,”
Bennett said in a speech on Sunday. “We could end up with fifth, sixth, even 10th elections, dismantling the walls of the country, brick by brick, until our house falls in on us. Or we can stop the madness and take responsibility.”

Over the last few days, factions from the right, center and left decided that they wanted to be done with Netanyahu. They agreed to a power-sharing agreement in which Bennett and his nationalist Yamina party would hold the prime minister’s position for the first half of the four-year term, to be followed by Yair Lapid, of the centrist Yesh Atid party, who would hold it for the second half.

To keep the coalition together, they have vowed to avoid new policies on Israeli-Palestinian issues at the beginning and to focus on areas where compromise seems more plausible, like education and infrastructure. “The roads are snarled in traffic, the intensive-care units were overwhelmed even before the pandemic, the schools are among the developed world’s worst,” David Halbfinger, a former Times Jerusalem bureau chief, says.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
#2
This one discusses what a new government in Israel might mean for U.S. foreign policy.

No love lost between Biden and Bibi, but what might next Israeli PM Bennett mean for the US?
https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/world/2021/06/03/netanyahu-out-bennett-in-what-israels-new-government-means-us/5290705001/

Bennett's rise as Israeli's possible next prime minister might, at first blush, seem to pose a fresh geopolitical headache for Biden.

For starters, Bennett has vowed to do "everything in my power, forever" to fight Palestinian statehood, and he supports unilaterally annexing 60% of the West Bank, among other inflammatory proposals that could threaten an uneasy truce in the Middle East.

And while Biden has frequently clashed with Netanyahu, the two men have a decades-long personal relationship that gave the U.S. president insights into Netanyahu's political tactics and pressure points.

"There's a kind of devil-you-know dynamic," said Khaled Elgindy, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute, a Washington-based think tank.

But Elgindy and other Middle East experts say Israel's new coalition government may actually be easier to deal with in some respects than Netanyahu, whose terms as Israel's prime minister overlapped with those of four American presidents.

'A very weak prime minister'?

Bennett's grip on power will be tenuous and conditional. And while Bennett will take the top job, Lapid is slated to serve as Israel's foreign minister in a coalition that includes at least eight parties and spans Israel's ideological spectrum.

"They will govern jointly, and in fact, with many others," said Natan Sachs, director of the Brookings Institution's Center for Middle East Policy. "Bennett will be a very weak prime minister" compared to his predecessors.

Bennett and Lapid have agreed not to pursue contentious policies that could split their fragile, multiparty alliance; they plan to focus mostly on domestic priorities.

“The coalition is so diverse that it’s hard to change much when it comes to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict," said Avi Eisenman, a long-time Bennett supporter from the Jewish settlement of Maleeh Adumin in the West Bank.

That would suit the White House well, since Biden had made it clear he does not want to become embroiled in Middle East peace negotiations.

And while Bennett would be a very "awkward partner" for Biden because of his far-right views on Palestinian issues, Lapid will be more simpatico, Sachs says.

A former TV journalist, Lapid's secular Yesh Atid party has championed socioeconomic issues and supports a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Perhaps more importantly, he has pledged to improve Israel's rapport with Democrats in Washington, which frayed under Netanyahu's partisan approach to U.S. politics.

"Prime Minister Netanyahu has made the mistake of affiliating himself way too much with the Republican Party," Lapid said during a forum with Brookings earlier this year. He noted that Netanyahu clashed repeatedly with former President Barack Obama over Middle East policy and then cultivated cozy ties with his GOP successor, Donald Trump.

Netanyahu seemed to have "taken a side in American politics" and sometimes appeared to be seeking confrontation with Democrats, Amir Tibon, an Israeli journalist with the Haaretz newspaper, said at a briefing this week hosted by the Israel Policy Forum.

"Bennett will be a fresh face," Tibon said. "It's easier to build new trust than to rebuild trust with someone that you've been confronted by and insulted by for so long."

Biden and a Bennett-Lapid government

Elgindy and others say the U.S.-Israel relationship is not likely to change dramatically in a post-Netanyahu era.

"Both the Biden administration and a Bennett-Lapid government will have an interest in downplaying differences," Elgindy said. But those differences could generate sparks nonetheless, he said.

One major flashpoint: The Biden administration's decision to revive the Iran nuclear deal, which Israel opposes. Under that agreement, Tehran agreed to limit its nuclear enrichment activities and submit to international inspections in exchange for sweeping sanctions relief.  

"The differences on Iran are considerable," Sachs said. "That's going to be a big question."

And while Bennett and Lapid will try to "freeze" the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Sachs notes that "reality might unfreeze the situation – as we just saw this last month in the worst way."

The underlying issues that triggered the 11-day war between Israel and Hamas in May have not been resolved. Hamas is the militant Islamic group that controls Gaza, home to about 2 million Palestinians.  

"The settlement machine is going to keep on rolling," Elgindy said, referring in part to a legal case pending before Israel's Supreme Court. That case involves an effort by Jewish settlers to evict Palestinians from their homes in East Jerusalem. The settlers say the land was owned by Jews before Israel became a state in 1948....

Frank Lowenstein, who served as special envoy for Israeli-Palestinian negotiations during the second term of the Obama Administration, said there will be “suspicion” toward Bennett in Washington because of his extremist views on Palestinian issues and because, unlike Netanyahu, is not a known quantity.

But Biden may be relieved not to deal with Netanyahu's savvy maneuvering in Washington, Lowenstein said, particularly if the White House is successful in reviving the Iran deal.  

“Bibi has a lot more experience and relationships in the United States that he could draw on to turn our political system against the Iran deal,” he said of Netanyahu's efforts to derail that agreement in 2015. Bennett does not have the same kinds of relationships and connections in the U.S. to leverage political opinion, Lowenstein said, so he may be resigned to statements of “grave concern” about any Washington-Tehran rapprochement.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)