Political Comics, Memes, Jokes, etc.

[GMDino]

[Belsnickel]

https://twitter.com/BR24/status/699849452840996864

[Rotobeast]

(02-17-2016, 12:50 AM)Vlad Wrote: We are? I'm not going to speculate what Sovereign was trying to get across to these people so i'll leave it up to him to explain.

What I was surprised at was that American Indians owned black slaves.

https://notevenpast.org/black-slaves-indian-masters-slavery-emancipation-and-citizenship-in-the-native-american-south-by-barbara-krauthamer-2013/

What I always knew was that black Americans owned slaves. Slavery was a part of black/African culture, yet the low information brainwashed liberals to this day envision slavery only as evil white people being bad to blacks.

No problem. 
Just look up Sovereign Citizens and chattel.
You'll get what I meant.
I suppose I shouldn't have assumed that SN was a part of that movement though.

[*Nately120*]

(02-17-2016, 04:49 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: https://twitter.com/BR24/status/699849452840996864

I'm convinced that is the societally-accepted version of positing a picture of your junk online.

[*Nately120*]

[*Nately120*]

[SunsetBengal]

(02-17-2016, 08:41 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: I really don't want to derail this thread, but I just don't understand the idea that deadly force is justified if there is only a threat to property. Obviously arson can cause a danger to life, but not always, and the smash and grab doesn't. I'm just not materialistic enough, I suppose.

So, destruction of the community is only a mere "property offense", got it.

(02-17-2016, 11:52 AM)fredtoast Wrote: Community watch groups are supposed to be for residential neighborhoods.

Sounds like this is some sort of private security force (lynch mob) for commercial businesses.

Plus, you should tell him that if he shoots a looter that is not threatening his life he will go to jail for a long time.

Fred, I really don't think the meme was to be taken seriously.  Originally, I only posted it to show how ignorant that people, some even in my own family, can be.

However, I do tend to think that if when I was a youth, that if an angry mob of us broke out and started looting and burning the town;  We likely would have been met with an equally angry mob of armed men in my current age group, demanding that we stand down and clean up that mess...

[SunsetBengal]

..

[SunsetBengal]

..

[Belsnickel]

(02-17-2016, 11:03 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: So, destruction of the community is only a mere "property offense", got it.

If it is only theft or destruction of property, then yes. It is only a property offense. By definition. And I don't see justification in the use of deadly force in response.

[GMDino]

[GMDino]

[SunsetBengal]

..

[NATI BENGALS]

(02-18-2016, 12:00 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: If it is only theft or destruction of property, then yes. It is only a property offense. By definition. And I don't see justification in the use of deadly force in response.

If someone comes in and steals all my stuff and burns my house down and I witness it chances are I would attempt to inflict serious bodily injury and maybe even kill them. 


We are animals. Take my food and shelter and you took my means of survival. Go after any mammal and destroy their home and take their food. You will get fight or flight. 

Little different scenario than looting a CVS. But still property destruction. You are going to get a reaction that ends when the threat appears over. 

If China starts shooting down all of our satallites. It is only property destruction. Would you ok deadly force there?

[Rotobeast]

(02-18-2016, 01:20 AM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: If someone comes in and steals all my stuff and burns my house down and I witness it chances are I would attempt to inflict serious bodily injury and maybe even kill them. 


We are animals. Take my food and shelter and you took my means of survival. Go after any mammal and destroy their home and take their food. You will get fight or flight. 

Little different scenario than looting a CVS. But still property destruction. You are going to get a reaction that ends when the threat appears over. 

If China starts shooting down all of our satallites. It is only property destruction. Would you ok deadly force there?

1992.....Real Americans...

[Belsnickel]

(02-18-2016, 01:20 AM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: If someone comes in and steals all my stuff and burns my house down and I witness it chances are I would attempt to inflict serious bodily injury and maybe even kill them. 


We are animals. Take my food and shelter and you took my means of survival. Go after any mammal and destroy their home and take their food. You will get fight or flight. 

Little different scenario than looting a CVS. But still property destruction. You are going to get a reaction that ends when the threat appears over. 

If China starts shooting down all of our satallites. It is only property destruction. Would you ok deadly force there?

I don't see an issue with physical attempts to end a threat to property. Deadly force, however, is not necessary unless there is a threat to your life. That is what I am talking about.

As for the China scenario, no. I'd be taking retaliatory actions of a similar nature and using defensive capabilities to put a stop to it. War would likely come because that action would precipitate things, but that wouldn't be my first instinct.

[Bengalzona]

[GMDino]

[GMDino]

[Bengalzona]