Steelers @ Seahawks Game Day

[6andcounting]

(11-29-2015, 09:31 PM)reuben.ahmed Wrote: Lol at that tackling, reminds me of the Bengals D. At least he got his towel off.

At least they eventually tackled Williams.

[Billy_Bengal]

(11-29-2015, 09:40 PM)Billy_Bengal Wrote: They know their D can make Seattle go 3 and out. FG wins it.

Lol! Or not.

[tjcase85]

3 game lead!!!

[reuben.ahmed]

Man, I go play Nintendo for 5 minutes and the score is totally different. Anyone wanna play some Defense?

[StoneTheCrow]

Was that Tebow to Thomas?

[cinci4life]

That's a pick no question.

[CKwi88]

I straight up don't understand catch rules, I won't even take a guess on this one.

[tjcase85]

Seems like an int to me

[6andcounting]

(11-29-2015, 09:49 PM)cinci4life Wrote: That's a pick no question.

I think incomplete because he has to maintain control.

[StoneTheCrow]

Carey is a complete joke. He's not fit to bag groceries.

[cinci4life]

Play stands as it should!

[CKwi88]

I get the stands call.

[*Awful Llama*]

Turn out the lights, the party's over

[West Union KennyG]

This game is sick! I can't believe that fat Pittsburgh QB has almost 500 yards of passing in this game.
We have to hit him harder in the next game.

[StoneTheCrow]

Nothing like betting on the Bengals and against the Steelers and being alive on a 3 team parlay.

[6andcounting]

(11-29-2015, 09:50 PM)CKwi88 Wrote: I straight up don't understand catch rules, I won't even take a guess on this one.

"Maintain possession all the way to the ground and through the catch" and each of those 12 words have arbitrary meaning that can mean anything at any given time.

[StLucieBengal]

The catch rule strikes again. This rears its ugly head as much as jason vorhees.

[6andcounting]

Ouch. It's different if it's just Steeler fans that think they got screwed.

[StoneTheCrow]

Seriously, you're perpetuating the Steelers fan stereotype by bitching about the officiating...for a NOT Super Bowl game...against the SEAHAWKS.

[kevin]

I said before the replay that there wasn't enough evidence to overturn the refs interception call, and that is what replay officials decided....I think the TV announcers confused the issue by questioning who had the ball out of bounds. Yes, they both had their hands on it out of bounds, the rear ends both out of bounds, BUT....out of bounds doesn't mean anything.....only in bounds means anything...The refs call was that the Seattle player had it in bounds, and there sure wasn't enough replay evidence to overturn that. ...Unless there is clear and undisputed evidence, the play stands as called....anything that happened out of bounds means nothing.