Supreme Court and the Abortion Pill

[GMDino]

Literally.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/12/us/supreme-court-abortion-pill.html?referringSource=articleShare

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jan/13/us-supreme-court-reinstates-restrictions-abortion-pill?utm_term=Autofeed&CMP=twt_gu&utm_medium&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1610539556

Quote:US supreme court reinstates restrictions on abortion pill
Justices lift order that had suspended rule requiring in-person visits during Covid crisis

• Coronavirus – latest updates
• See all our coronavirus coverage
  

The US supreme court has reinstated a requirement that women visit a hospital or clinic to obtain a drug used for medication-induced abortions, lifting an order by a lower court allowing the drug to be posted or delivered during the coronavirus pandemic.

The justices granted a request by the Trump administration to lift a federal judge’s July order that had suspended the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) rule requiring in-person visits.

[/url]States use coronavirus to ban abortions, leaving women desperate: ‘You can’t pause a pregnancy’

Read more
[url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/30/us-states-ban-abortions-coronavirus-leave-women-desperate]
The pandemic is still raging nationwide. Infections remain at record highs in many states and nearly 130,000 Americans were admitted to hospital with Covid-19 as of midnight on Monday. The country has reported 22.5 million infections and 376,188 deaths.

The court’s three liberal justices said they would have denied the Trump administration’s request while litigation over the dispute continued in lower courts.

A district judge in Maryland, Theodore Chuang, had ruled that owing to the health risks that Covid-19 poses, the in-person requirements “place a substantial obstacle in the path of women seeking a medication abortion” and were likely to violate their constitutional rights.


He said the government had also taken actions to, in effect, waive several in-person requirements for dispensing other drugs, including opioids.


The dispute centres on the FDA’s requirement that the drug mifepristone, one of two pills used to perform a medication abortion, be dispensed in-person by a certified prescriber. Medication abortions are approved through the first 10 weeks of pregnancy.

Groups representing tens of thousands of physicians, including the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, sued the FDA in May, saying that requiring in-person visits to pick up a pill needlessly exposes patients, doctors, and workers to a greater risk of contracting Covid-19.

The groups said this was especially true given that evaluations and counselling may be done through telemedicine and that the drug may be taken elsewhere.

The supreme court chief justice, John Roberts, said the dispute was not generally about the right to abortion but rather courts’ deference to government decisions related to the pandemic.

When I initially read this I didn't have a problem with it for a very specific reason:  I imagined someone saying they were getting the pill for someone else and the other person not wanting it.   Rather the first person wanted to give it to a pregnant woman for their own reasons.

Maybe I listen to too many true crime podcasts. 

But reading it a second time it is also bad that this is the only(?) situation where the admin insisted the waiver be lifted.  Another attempt to make abortions harder to get.  To me it's much like when churches demanded they be able to meet since Walmart was open.  They felt the restrictions were not fairly applied.  Same here with women being forced to risk going out during a pandemic when other are not.