Texas Senate passes bill that removes MLK, suffrage and Native American history

[GMDino]

They always say it's in the interest of being "fair".  

"Very good people on both sides", if you will.

"I love the poorly educated", perhaps.

https://nationalpost.com/news/world/texas-senate-passes-bill-that-removes-mlk-suffrage-and-native-american-history-from-required-curriculum

Quote:It also cuts the requirement to teach 'the history of white supremacy, including but not limited to the institution of slavery, the eugenics movement, and the Ku Klux Klan, and the ways in which it is morally wrong'
Author of the article:
National Post Staff
Published Jul 21, 2021  •  3 minute read
[/url]
126 Comments

[img=1000x750]https://smartcdn.gprod.postmedia.digital/nationalpost/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/1233341467-1.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=288&h=216&sig=a1SPPL4e0KcHOnFiPrlDxA[/img]Governor Greg Abbott speaks during a press conference where he signed Senate Bills 2 and 3 at the Capitol on June 8, 2021 in Austin, Texas. PHOTO BY MONTINIQUE MONROE/GETTY IMAGES

Article content
The Texas state senate passed a bill that would no longer require public schools to cover writings on the civil rights movement, women’s suffrage and Native American history in its social studies classes.


Senate Bill 3 would be appended to a law signed by Governor Greg Abbott in May, which is set to come in effect later this year. Although not stated explicitly in either the bill or the law, Republican lawmakers say both bills would ban the teaching of critical race theory, which asserts that racism is woven into the U.S. legal system and ingrained in its primary institutions.


The proposal diverts from the new law, removing requirements to teach works pertaining to racial relations and white supremacy in U.S. history. It would drop teachings of the life and works of Cesar Chavez and Dolores Huerta and writings by Susan B. Anthony, Frederick Douglass and Martin Luther King Jr., whose “I Have a Dream” speech and “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” would be abandoned.


It also cuts the requirement to teach “the history of white supremacy, including but not limited to the institution of slavery, the eugenics movement, and the Ku Klux Klan, and the ways in which it is morally wrong.”

Additionally, the bill makes it harder on teachers to broach controversial issues or current topics. The bill says instructors must not give “deference to any one perspective.” It also forbids schools from granting course credit for joining organizations that lobby for legislation “at the federal, state or local level.”


Rep. Bryan Hughes, who introduced the bill, defended it by saying the bill doesn’t change what is taught and prohibits teachers from being compelled to talk about current events or controversial issues, among other things, KVUE [url=https://www.kvue.com/article/news/politics/texas-legislature/critical-race-theory-senate-texas-legislature/269-9e40d158-a700-437b-8bf0-8d8a2aaeec92]reported.


“Our classrooms should be places for fostering a diverse and fact-based discussion of various perspectives,” said Hughes on the Senate floor. “They’re not for planting seeds for a divisive political agenda.”


However, critics have said the bill would prevent teachers from accurately representing history. When speaking on the Senate floor Sen. Judith Zaffirini (D) said the legislation equates to “tying the hands of our teachers.”


“How could a teacher possibly discuss slavery, the Holocaust, or the mass shootings at the Walmart in El Paso or at the Sutherland Springs church in my district without giving deference to any one perspective?,” she said.


“The amendments the House added were essential to ensure that we were teaching students all of American history — the good, the bad and the ugly,” the Democratic Rep. James Talarico told Texas Tribune. “They were put in place to ensure that teachers wouldn’t be punished for telling their students the truth. And if we were to strip them, I could see teachers across the state of Texas being silenced.”


“It’s a frightening dystopian future that starts to come into focus,” he added.


The bill passed 18 to 4 but could stall in the House, where quorum has been lost. Early last week, dozens of House Democrats fled to Washington D.C. to block ‘election integrity’ bills from passing during a special session. The bill could die (for now) unless more of the Democrats return by the end of the special session, on Aug. 6.


With a file from Reuters

[Dill]

(01-17-2024, 11:10 AM)GMDino Wrote: They always say it's in the interest of being "fair". 
"Very good people on both sides", if you will.
"I love the poorly educated", perhaps.
https://nationalpost.com/news/world/texas-senate-passes-bill-that-removes-mlk-suffrage-and-native-american-history-from-required-curriculum

The Texas state senate passed a bill that would no longer require public schools to cover writings on the civil rights movement, women’s suffrage and Native American history in its social studies classes....

It also cuts the requirement to teach “the history of white supremacy, including but not limited to the institution of slavery, the eugenics movement, and the Ku Klux Klan, and the ways in which it is morally wrong.”

So its not a "requirement." Maybe a teacher could still teach about slavery and the Klan, if it were ok with the principal and school board.Students can learn history from the internet anyway, where it's more fun.

The bill says instructors must not give “deference to any one perspective.” It also forbids schools from granting course credit for joining organizations that lobby for legislation “at the federal, state or local level.”

“Our classrooms should be places for fostering a diverse and fact-based discussion of various perspectives,” said Hughes on the Senate floor. “They’re not for planting seeds for a divisive political agenda.”

Sounds like people are tired of politicizing history, which should include all points of view and not just those against racism.

As I understand it, people could still teach about the Klan, but in a non-judgmental way. Just facts. So many cross-burnings here, so many lynchings there, some church bombings maybe. Students could debate the pros and cons and the teacher would be neutral.