The Mooch Dumps Trump?

[Dill]

So Mooch has joined "the Left." LOL

People always wonder if the proverbial "last tweet" was the tipping point.  Then nothing happens.

"Oh, He’s RACIST Racist: Anthony Scaramucci Says He Can No Longer Support Trump for President."
https://www.theroot.com/oh-he-s-racist-racist-anthony-scaramucci-says-he-can-1837169291

Anthony Scaramucci lasted just 11 short days as Donald Trump’s White House communications director during the summer of 2017. Like many others handpicked by the “president,” he was ousted and sent on his merry way to become one of many people who briefly worked for the revolving door that is the Trump administration before finding themselves on the unemployment line.
Even after being pushed out, Scaramucci continued to stand by his man and support Trump, showing an inexplicable loyalty to a man who has proven time and time again that he finds people to be disposable. If you don’t serve a purpose for Trump, he has no use for you.

Scaramucci’s faith in the white-nationalist-in-chief has apparently been stretched too far, however, as he has recently gone on record to say that he can no longer abide by the things Trump has been saying in the media and he no longer supports him as a candidate for president in 2020.

"Scaramucci breaks with Trump, no longer backs president’s re-election bid."
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/scaramucci-breaks-trump-longer-backs-presidents-election-bid/story?id=64926788

"He goes after individuals as the president of the United States on his Twitter account, which incites hate, which incites death threats," Scaramucci said of the president on CNN's New Day. "At some point the people in my party will have to look at all this stuff and stop being anesthetized to it and say 'hey, what are we doing?'"
............................................................................................................................................................................

I'll start believing when Kayleigh MacEneny dumps Trump.

"The Facts are Not your Friend."
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2019/07/18/cuomo-great-debate-trump-racist-remarks-democratic-congresswomen-cpt-vpx.cnn

[GMDino]

It's just a matter of time for most people.  

Has anyone ever came out to talk about being Trump's "friend" or hsa anyone stuck with him (unpaid/unrelated) for any length of time in his life?

[jj22]

If Trump is voted out in 2020 then you will find there will be no one who agreed with him and many Conservatives/Republicans will be admitting/speaking out against him. They just can't say it now, but when they are no longer invested in the politics of having their party POTUS the truth will come out and he'll be everything he was during the primary (con, racist etc) that they know he is but won't say it now that he's POTUS.

Kinda like the Religious right getting their morals ready to apply to Dems as they sense the end is near.

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/08/12/trump-evangelicals-blasphemy-profanity-1456178

Comical after all he's done and they've supported. Maybe they should have thought about this when he bragged about sexual assault. Since they ignored the cheating on wives and paying off porn stars.

Yea, they'll be fully back on that high horse in time for 2020 if a Dem is elected.

[Dill]

(08-12-2019, 02:30 PM)jj22 Wrote: If Trump is voted out in 2020 then you will find there will be no one who agreed with him and many Conservatives/Republicans will be admitting/speaking out against him. They just can't say it now, but when they are no longer invested in the politics of having their party POTUS the truth will come out and he'll be everything he was during the primary (con, racist etc) that they know he is but won't say it now that he's POTUS.

Kinda like the Religious right getting their morals ready to apply to Dems as they sense the end is near.

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/08/12/trump-evangelicals-blasphemy-profanity-1456178

Comical after all he's done and they've supported. Maybe they should have thought about this when he bragged about sexual assault. Since they ignored the cheating on wives and paying off porn stars.

Yea, they'll be fully back on that high horse in time for 2020 if a Dem is elected.

A group of female evangelicals and another group of black evangelicals broke away from him in 2017. Maybe those groups will grow as Evangelicals who tolerate racism and misogyny--but not taking the lord's name in vain--will join them.

“I think this president needs to be president to all of the people and realize that kids look up to him and adults look up to him,” Hardesty said. “Carrying that type of language from behind the presidential seal is offensive.”

[Sociopathicsteelerfan]

You guys should be far more concerned with the far left positions of the Dem candidates.  Taking away private insurance, open borders, reparations and several other radical positions will drive people to Trump in droves, regardless of what he says or tweets.

[GMDino]

(08-12-2019, 03:35 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: You guys should be far more concerned with the far left positions of the Dem candidates.  Taking away private insurance, open borders, reparations and several other radical positions will drive people to Trump in droves, regardless of what he says or tweets.

Well like I said I'll wait until that shakes out.  I don't believe the more radical ideas will get beyond the primaries.

(I also think a lot of the ideas being proposed aren't so "far left" as they are being reported by the right.)

But even if they do I'd vote for anyone but Trump.  Hopefully enough people have seen his awful side to agree.  If not we'll have four more yers of a man-child whining he way through a term in the oval office.

[jj22]

Nobody drives people to Trump. They are him and he is they. Nothing more. Don't blame Dems because people support and accept Trump's "ways". What does Dems' "policy" have to do with them turning on American Intel? Loving Putin? Loving Kim? etc.. What does Dems have to do with Evangelicals turning on their biblical teachings to promote Trump as our moral compass? Folks just using Dems as an excuses to be themselves.

That's on them, and a reflection of their values.

I just don't understand why so many of them are so ashamed to admit it (well I do). Their vote (which they can barely admit to either) however says all that is needed.

[Sociopathicsteelerfan]

(08-12-2019, 04:46 PM)jj22 Wrote: Nobody drives people to Trump.

Hillary Clinton says hello.

[Dill]

(08-12-2019, 04:46 PM)jj22 Wrote: Nobody drives people to Trump. They are him and he is they. Nothing more. Don't blame Dems because people support and accept Trump's "ways".  What does Dems' "policy" have to do with them turning on American Intel? Loving Putin? Loving Kim? etc.. What does Dems have to do with Evangelicals turning on their biblical teachings to promote Trump as our moral compass? Folks just using Dems as an excuses to be themselves.

That's on them, and a reflection of their values.

I just don't understand why so many of them are so ashamed to admit it (well I do). Their vote (which they can barely admit to either) however says all that is needed.

In a sense, Trump's base is driven to Trump by the Fox "far left" versions of socialist Hillary and Obama. Add to that the demonization of mainstream media as "fake news" and the failure of the Republican establishment fight Dems dirty.  Hillary is still far worse than a public racist, misogynist xenophobe who supports Putin over his own intel community, assigned to defend the country. She still has not apologized to the families of those slain at Benghazi. Plus she would have insured the continuance of Obamacare, picked the wrong judges, raised taxes on the rich, and not built a "beautiful" wall on our border or more pens for children of criminals violating our sovereignty. There should be rule of law on the border.

But most of those people aren't going to vote Democrat no how.

Now we might get a real leftist for president.

[jj22]

(08-12-2019, 04:47 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Hillary Clinton says hello.

I don't think she did honestly. I think that's the easy answer because Hillary is so polarizing, but the truth is Trump reached people in ways she didn't, and didn't try hard enough to. Now I disagree with a lot of what he said and much of it was a con man's sells job, but he still had a strong base and knew how to reach people. I think she helped motivate the Republican base, but Republicans always vote, they understand the Supreme Court repercussions etc for example

It's Dems voters who can't stay focused on the big picture.

Hillary just thought she had it all in the bag and didn't have to get down and dirty and work places like Michigan for their vote etc.


Just my true opinion.

[Dill]

(08-12-2019, 05:13 PM)jj22 Wrote: I don't think she did honestly. I think that's the easy answer because Hillary is so polarizing, but the truth is Trump reached people in ways she didn't, and didn't try hard enough to. Now I disagree with a lot of what he said and much of it was a con man's sells job, but he still had a strong base and knew how to reach people. I think she helped motivate the Republican base, but Republicans always vote, they understand the Supreme Court repercussions etc for example

It's Dems voters who can't stay focused on the big picture.

Hillary just thought she had it all in the bag and didn't have to get down and dirty and work places like Michigan for their vote etc.

Just my true opinion.

She did win the popular vote by almost 3 million.  People discount that sometimes saying "yeah, California!" like their votes shouldn't count as much.  But I agree; Trump reached people in ways she didn't--"Muslim ban" "Rapists"!  

As far as Wisconsin, Michigan and PA, it looked like she had those states, and so (wisely I think) spent her energy in Florida, VA, and NC. Have to wonder what would have happened had not the Russians sided with Trump and Comey had not decided to reopen emailgate. The latter especially seems to have suppressed the Hillary vote.  77,000 was difference in three states.

The one silver lining in all this is that, had Hillary won, there'd be no end to all the talk of how Trump would have built the wall by now, drained the swamp, sorted out NK, balanced our trade against China, implemented a cheaper, better healthcare option than the ACA, and maybe even jailed Hillary. Our country would be more secure from espionage and election interference, and other countries would RESPECT US etc.  In addition to being a constant "socialist," Hillary'd be compared every week to an imaginary Trump--a BUSINESSMAN from the world of corporate accountability, who knew how to select competent people and get things done. Just like on The Apprentice. Instead of someone who knew how the world REALLY works and can fire incompetents, we got a feminist, who blurrs the line between business and government--and involves her family in government by making her two-term former president husband an advisor--a misogynist with multiple accusations of assault and rape against him! The national debt would be over 22,000,000,000,000 by now.

Never Trumpers understood very well what he would do to the party--especially if he won.

[*TheLeonardLeap*]

(08-12-2019, 08:53 PM)Dill Wrote: But I agree; Trump reached people in ways she didn't--"Muslim ban" "Rapists"!  

As far as Wisconsin, Michigan and PA, it looked like she had those states, and so (wisely I think) spent her energy in Florida, VA, and NC. 

Visits in final 100 Days of the campaign (according to NBC)...

Florida:
Trump 39
Clinton 29

North Carolina:
Trump 23
Clinton: 16

Wisconsin:
Trump 6
Clinton 0

Ohio:
Trump 26
Clinton 17

Michigan:
Trump 13
Clinton 6




If Clinton matches his visits to those states in the final 100 days, she is likely President today. Not sure which, but it was either bad campaign choices, or she just physically couldn't keep up with that much travel. Clinton ended up visiting only 37 States (and DC) to Trump's 45 States (and DC). She spent way more time on fundraising instead (350+ fundraisers to Trump's 50-60 according to ABC).

Interesting fact: Neither Trump nor Clinton visited Idaho, Wyoming, Hawaii, or Alaska.

Also didn't help that Clinton couldn't get the black vote to turn out. (Went from 66.6% turnout in 2012 to 59.6% in 2016.)

[Dill]

(08-13-2019, 03:16 AM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Visits in final 100 Days of the campaign (according to NBC)...

Florida:
Trump 39
Clinton 29

North Carolina:
Trump 23
Clinton: 16

Wisconsin:
Trump 6
Clinton 0

Ohio:
Trump 26
Clinton 17

Michigan:
Trump 13
Clinton 6




If Clinton matches his visits to those states in the final 100 days, she is likely President today. Not sure which, but it was either bad campaign choices, or she just physically couldn't keep up with that much travel. Clinton ended up visiting only 37 States (and DC) to Trump's 45 States (and DC). She spent way more time on fundraising instead (350+ fundraisers to Trump's 50-60 according to ABC).

Interesting fact: Neither Trump nor Clinton visited Idaho, Wyoming, Hawaii, or Alaska.

Also didn't help that Clinton couldn't get the black vote to turn out. (Went from 66.6% turnout in 2012 to 59.6% in 2016.)

I think Texas, Mississippi and Alabama would have been a waste of time for Hillary. New York and CA for Trump. And I don't think she could have kept pace with Trump.

One big thing in Trump's favor were the RALLIES, which attracted more attention than "fundraisers"--and more voters too, likely.

[BakertheBeast]

I watched the Mooch on Bill Maher. He basically said he didn't agree with some of the things Trump said but he was his friend and would stand by him. I don't know when the Mooch "turned" on him. He said some of the things Trump said were indefensible or deplorable or something to that effect. Maybe that was what pissed Trump off.

Trump said he "accidentally" Watched the show too. How do you accidentally watch a tv show?

[Dill]

(08-13-2019, 06:01 AM)BakertheBeast Wrote: I watched the Mooch on Bill Maher. He basically said he didn't agree with some of the things Trump said but he was his friend and would stand by him. I don't know when the Mooch "turned" on him. He said some of the things Trump said were indefensible or deplorable or something to that effect. Maybe that was what pissed Trump off.

Trump said he "accidentally" Watched the show too. How do you accidentally watch a tv show?

Seems like Trump forces those around him to submit to total control. No criticism whatsoever.

"How can you 'stand by' someone while criticizing his racism?" Trump was probably thinking.  For Trump, the problem was Mooch, not his own racist tweets. Mooch couldn't take it any more and came clean.

One by one, others are slowly growing a conscience.  OR they are perhaps thinking of life AFTER Trump?

The Fox counterattack:

Trump campaign aide: 'Loser' Anthony Scaramucci 'is all about' himself and he 'terrorized' staff
https://www.foxnews.com/media/trump-campaign-aide-loser-anthony-scaramucci-is-all-about-himself-and-he-terrorized-staff

If you are not Trump, then it's bad to be "all about yourself" and terrorize staff.

The LIBERAL MEDIA may believe the Mooch, but Trump supporters should know better!