Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Shazier Rule
#21
(03-22-2016, 10:24 AM)GMDino Wrote: You may be right.  A quick search shows they redefined it after Brady got hurt.

Not that penalizing the Palmer hit would've made a difference - the same cannot be said of the hit on Bernard (in theory).

Ah well. Shit is done and over with - too late for the Bengals. On to next season.
Our father, who art in Hell
Unhallowed, be thy name
Cursed be thy sons and daughters
Of our nemesis who are to blame
Thy kingdom come, Nema
Reply/Quote
#22
(03-21-2016, 05:51 PM)6andcounting Wrote: Another offseason moral victory for the Bengals. They're killing it this offseason and it's not even the draft yet.

The hines ward rule....the shazier rule....and steeler fans cry about how dirty Burfict is. Hilarious
Reply/Quote
#23
(03-22-2016, 12:58 PM)Beaker Wrote: The hines ward rule....the shazier rule....and steeler fans cry about how dirty Burfict is. Hilarious
The problem fans (that includes Carolina, Baltimore and the countless other teams the guy has been flagged or fined for illegal hits) have with Burfict is that he continues to make illegal hits. No one cares about his hard, legal hits. Now the Bengal fans here have a mental and emotional breakdown every time a Steeler makes a hard hit even when it's legal. That's what separates bengal fan whining from say Panthers fans being mad at Burfict for getting fined for twisting ankles after the play.
[Image: Cz_eGI3UUAASnqC.jpg]
Reply/Quote
#24
(03-22-2016, 01:04 PM)6andcounting Wrote: The problem fans (that includes Carolina, Baltimore and the countless other teams the guy has been flagged or fined for illegal hits) have with Burfict is that he continues to make illegal hits. No one cares about his hard, legal hits. Now the Bengal fans here have a mental and emotional breakdown every time a Steeler makes a hard hit even when it's legal. That's what separates bengal fan whining from say Panthers fans being mad at Burfict for getting fined for twisting ankles after the play.

The steeler hits were dirty too. No two ways about it. Just because they were considered legal at the time didnt make them not dirty. There were simply no rules in place that could address the hits at the time of the hits. They were in fact so dirty that rules had to be changed to cover them in the future. What steeler fans forget is that there is no "Burfict rule". The fact that the steelers players have two rules named after them for hits so dirty they are now deemed illegal should say all that is needed to say.
Reply/Quote
#25
(03-22-2016, 01:34 PM)Beaker Wrote: The steeler hits were dirty too. No two ways about it. Just because they were considered legal at the time didnt make them not dirty. There were simply no rules in place that could address the hits at the time of the hits. They were in fact so dirty that rules had to be changed to cover them in the future. What steeler fans forget is that there is no "Burfict rule". The fact that the steelers players have two rules named after them for hits so dirty they are now deemed illegal should say all that is needed to say.

You are correct.

He's just not smart enough to not break the other, already existing rules.
[Image: giphy.gif]
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.
Reply/Quote
#26
(03-22-2016, 10:15 AM)BigPapaKain Wrote: You sure about that? I thought the hit on Palmer set the rule and the Brady hit just expanded the rule.

Also, Brady is a household name. Palmer was not. The Brady Rule sounds better than the Palmer rule which sounds more like a guide to beating one's dick.

No, the Palmer rule applies to how someone gayily eats their hot dog, not beats their dick.

[Image: 59396c5af6a23f2ae8e871ff5ce6fbb7.jpg]
Reply/Quote
#27
(03-22-2016, 09:13 AM)Crazyjdawg Wrote: So the illegal hit that everyone knew was illegal at the time is now officially illegal, despite always being illegal, after the scenario in which it being illegal would have hurt the Steelers chances of advancing in the playoffs had already passed?

Good to know, NFL.

Not so fast.
They make the call, then Ben doesn't get hurt 4 plays later.  Cincinnati would've gotten the ball at the 10 and probably would've scored shortly after. But as it played out, they scored 7 plays later anyway PLUS they knocked Ben from the game. Looks to me like Cincinnati actually benefitted more by the missed call on Shazier than it hurt them. 
Reply/Quote
#28
(03-22-2016, 01:04 PM)6andcounting Wrote: The problem fans (that includes Carolina, Baltimore and the countless other teams the guy has been flagged or fined for illegal hits) have with Burfict is that he continues to make illegal hits. No one cares about his hard, legal hits. Now the Bengal fans here have a mental and emotional breakdown every time a Steeler makes a hard hit even when it's legal. That's what separates bengal fan whining from say Panthers fans being mad at Burfict for getting fined for twisting ankles after the play.

Spearing has never been legal.....anyone who has ever snapped a chinstrap knows this.....

"Better send those refunds..."

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
#29
(03-22-2016, 02:19 PM)StrictlyBiz Wrote: Not so fast.
They make the call, then Ben doesn't get hurt 4 plays later.  Cincinnati would've gotten the ball at the 10 and probably would've scored shortly after. But as it played out, they scored 7 plays later anyway PLUS they knocked Ben from the game. Looks to me like Cincinnati actually benefitted more by the missed call on Shazier than it hurt them. 

If you want to play that game then we could say it certainly did hurt because Hill only got the ball on that last series because Gio was unavailable due to concussion protocol. lewis even said Gio wouldve been in there instead of Hill because he protects the ball better. So there would be no fumble, no personal foul penalties, and the Bengals playoff win draught would be over.
Reply/Quote
#30
(03-22-2016, 02:19 PM)StrictlyBiz Wrote: Not so fast.
They make the call, then Ben doesn't get hurt 4 plays later.  Cincinnati would've gotten the ball at the 10 and probably would've scored shortly after. But as it played out, they scored 7 plays later anyway PLUS they knocked Ben from the game. Looks to me like Cincinnati actually benefitted more by the missed call on Shazier than it hurt them. 

Yes because a fumble plus losing your least fumble prone running back sure as shit was a huge boon.
Our father, who art in Hell
Unhallowed, be thy name
Cursed be thy sons and daughters
Of our nemesis who are to blame
Thy kingdom come, Nema
Reply/Quote
#31
(03-22-2016, 02:19 PM)StrictlyBiz Wrote: Not so fast.
They make the call, then Ben doesn't get hurt 4 plays later.  Cincinnati would've gotten the ball at the 10 and probably would've scored shortly after. But as it played out, they scored 7 plays later anyway PLUS they knocked Ben from the game. Looks to me like Cincinnati actually benefitted more by the missed call on Shazier than it hurt them. 

Man, I know steeler fans are pretty slow, but this is still egregious. Lay off that PBR for awhile buddy. Hilarious
It's easy to see the world in black and white. Grey? I don't know what to do with grey.

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
#32
(03-22-2016, 01:04 PM)6andcounting Wrote: The problem fans (that includes Carolina, Baltimore and the countless other teams the guy has been flagged or fined for illegal hits) have with Burfict is that he continues to make illegal hits. No one cares about his hard, legal hits. Now the Bengal fans here have a mental and emotional breakdown every time a Steeler makes a hard hit even when it's legal. That's what separates bengal fan whining from say Panthers fans being mad at Burfict for getting fined for twisting ankles after the play.

Bengals fans have long complained about the dirty hits from Pittsburgh players and the only argument Steelers fans have been able to muster is "Quit Crying". Ok.. that's fine. But along comes Burfict who, in my opinion, plays like a Steeler, and the entire fanbase goes crazy over him. Now, I know you have to temper yourself since you are posting on a Bengals site and need to make sure you don't leave yourself open to obvious shots, but go ahead and meander over to ANY Steelers site and see how frothy they get over anything Burfict related. I watched them go frame by frame and try to prove his hit on Bell was dirty.
Reply/Quote
#33
(03-22-2016, 02:50 PM)Beaker Wrote: If you want to play that game then we could say it certainly did hurt because Hill only got the ball on that last series because Gio was unavailable due to concussion protocol. lewis even said Gio wouldve been in there instead of Hill because he protects the ball better. So there would be no fumble, no personal foul penalties, and the Bengals playoff win draught would be over.

You're talking about something that happened an entire quarter later. Im talking about a something that happened immediately after the missed call and was the direct result of the missed call. It's quite possible that the fumble, or non fumble doesn't even matter if Ben stays in the game. We'll really never know. 

But look at it this way....

Knowing nothing else about the game: score, time remaining, momentum, etc....would you trade a missed personal foul penalty if you knew that as a result the other teams starting quarterback who is one of the best in the league, would be lost for the next quarter of the game? Think about the advantage of knocking Tom Brady out of 25% of the game in the AFC Divisional round. Think about how that would impact the game. 

And that's my point. As much as the Bengals were screwed by that missed call, the Steelers were screwed worse by losing Ben and losing any ability to match Cincinnati's surge in momentum. 

Who knows if the outcome would have been any different. The fact is that missed call hurt Pittsburgh too. Worse than Cincinnati. 
Reply/Quote
#34
(03-22-2016, 05:36 PM)StrictlyBiz Wrote: You're talking about something that happened an entire quarter later. Im talking about a something that happened immediately after the missed call and was the direct result of the missed call. It's quite possible that the fumble, or non fumble doesn't even matter if Ben stays in the game. We'll really never know. 

But look at it this way....

Knowing nothing else about the game: score, time remaining, momentum, etc....would you trade a missed personal foul penalty if you knew that as a result the other teams starting quarterback who is one of the best in the league, would be lost for the next quarter of the game? Think about the advantage of knocking Tom Brady out of 25% of the game in the AFC Divisional round. Think about how that would impact the game. 

And that's my point. As much as the Bengals were screwed by that missed call, the Steelers were screwed worse by losing Ben and losing any ability to match Cincinnati's surge in momentum. 

Who knows if the outcome would have been any different. The fact is that missed call hurt Pittsburgh too. Worse than Cincinnati. 

That is the stupidest thing I've ever read. I mean wow. "It's a good thing that you're running back got hurt, and fumbled the ball in the redzone to take away a possible score." Mellow
It's easy to see the world in black and white. Grey? I don't know what to do with grey.

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
#35
(03-22-2016, 02:19 PM)StrictlyBiz Wrote: Not so fast.
They make the call, then Ben doesn't get hurt 4 plays later.  Cincinnati would've gotten the ball at the 10 and probably would've scored shortly after. But as it played out, they scored 7 plays later anyway PLUS they knocked Ben from the game. Looks to me like Cincinnati actually benefitted more by the missed call on Shazier than it hurt them. 

Doesn't work that way.





[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
Reply/Quote
#36
Who said that it was a good thing?

So then you don't think that losing Andy Dalton on the first drive on the second Pittsburgh game hurt the Bengals, right?
Reply/Quote
#37
(03-22-2016, 01:34 PM)Beaker Wrote: The steeler hits were dirty too. No two ways about it. Just because they were considered legal at the time didnt make them not dirty. There were simply no rules in place that could address the hits at the time of the hits. They were in fact so dirty that rules had to be changed to cover them in the future. What steeler fans forget is that there is no "Burfict rule". The fact that the steelers players have two rules named after them for hits so dirty they are now deemed illegal should say all that is needed to say.

If they were "so dirty" then they would have never been legal.  Since they were legal then they can't be dirty.

You need understand that these rules were not put into place because they were dirty, the NFL decided to make illegal those types of hits in an increasing effort to protect players from head injuries.
Reply/Quote
#38
(03-22-2016, 02:48 PM)Wyche Wrote: Spearing has never been legal.....anyone who has ever snapped a chinstrap knows this.....

There's a lot Bengal fans don't know. One source I found indicated spearing was banned in 1976. This one indicates 1979.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000224872/article/evolution-of-the-rules-from-hashmarksto-crackback-blocks

To view an interactive timeline of evolution of rules of the sport, visit NFL.com/Evolution. The following provides a brief overview of NFL rule changes focused on protecting player health and safety since 1920.

1920
  • The American Professional Football Association becomes the country's first organized professional football league.
1922
  • The APFA becomes the National Football League.
1929
  • A Field Judge is added to the officiating crew.
1933
  • Hashmarks are drawn 10 yards from the sidelines.
1938
  • The deliberate roughing of a passer after the ball has left his hand is unnecessary roughness. (Previously, the passer was protected after the pass had been made if he was "obviously out of the play.")
1943
  • Helmets become mandatory equipment.
1947
  • A Back Judge is added to the officiating crew.
1955
  • The ball is dead immediately if the runner touches the ground with any part of his body except his hands or feet while in the grasp of an opponent.
1956
  • The ball is dead immediately if a runner touches the ground with any part of his body except his hands or feet after being contacted by a defensive player.
  • Grasping the face mask of any opponent except a runner is illegal use of hands. Penalty: Five yards.
1962
  • Grasping the face mask of an opponent is illegal. Penalty: 15 yards. A flagrant offender shall be disqualified.
1966
  • All goal posts must be offset from the goal line.
1967
  • A player who signals for a fair catch may not block or initiate contact with one of the kickers until the ball touches a player.
1971
  • A team will not be charged a timeout for an injured player unless the injury occurs in the last two minutes of either half.
1973
  • A defensive player who jumps or stands on a teammate or who is picked up by a teammate cannot attempt to block an opponent's kick. Penalty: 15 yards.
1974
  • Eligible receivers who take a position more than two yards from the tackle, whether on or behind the line, may not be blocked below the waist at or behind the line of scrimmage.
  • No receiver can be blocked below the waist after moving beyond the line of scrimmage.
  • An offensive player who is aligned in a position more than two yards laterally outside of the offensive tackle may not contact an opponent below the waist if the blocker is moving toward the position of the ball either at the snap or after it is made, and contact occurs within an area three yards on either side of the line of scrimmage. Penalty: 15 yards for an illegal crackback block.
1976
  • A defender cannot place a hand or hands on a teammate to gain additional height in an attempt to block a kick.
  • A defender is not permitted to run or dive into a ball carrier who has fallen to the ground untouched.
1977
  • It is illegal for a defensive lineman to strike an opponent above the shoulders (head slap) during his initial charge. (Previously, it was legal only during the first step.)
  • The crackback prohibition is extended to running backs who move outside the tight end and back inside to deliver a block below the waist.
  • It is illegal for a wide receiver to clip an opponent anywhere (including in the legal clipping zone).
1979
  • Mandatory equipment is specified for all players to wear during a game.
  • Players on the receiving team are prohibited from blocking opponents below the waist during kickoffs, punts, and field goal attempts.
  • The crackback zone is extended from three yards to five yards on either side of the line of scrimmage.
  • Officials will declare the ball dead as soon as the quarterback is clearly in the grasp and control of any tackler.
  • A player may be penalized for unsportsmanlike conduct for non-contact acts such as throwing a punch or a forearm, or kicking at an opponent.
  • It is unnecessary roughness if a tackler uses his helmet to butt, spear, or ram an opponent, or if any player uses the crown or top of the helmet unnecessarily.
  • A player in the backfield is prohibited from chopping an outside rusher on a pass play.
1980
  • It is illegal for a player to strike, swing, or club an opponent in the head, neck, or face even if the initial contact is below the neck.
  • The use of a "quick whistle" by the referee whenever the quarterback is in the grasp and control of a tackler applies only behind the line.
  • A Chop Block (below the waist) is also prohibited by a tight end against an outside rusher. The prohibition applies to pass plays and any plays in which the player receiving the snap initially shows pass.
1981
  • Chop Blocks (at or below the knee) are prohibited by interior linemen on passing plays or plays in which a lineman shows an attempt to pass block. If an offensive player who fires out at the snap blocks an opponent at or below the knee, the defender cannot be double-teamed by a teammate of the offensive player.
1982
  • Hip pads must be covered by the outer uniform.
  • It is illegal for any player to use the crown or top of his helmet against a passer, a receiver in the act of catching a pass, or a runner who is in the grasp of a tackler.
1983
  • All mandatory player equipment must be designed and made by a professional manufacturer and cannot be altered, except by direction of the team physician.
  • A player who uses a helmet he is not wearing as a weapon shall be ejected.
  • The Chop Block rule applies to blocks at "thigh or lower."
1985
  • During the last two minutes of a half, the play ends when a quarterback kneels or simulates kneeling on the ground.
  • The ball is dead when any runner slides to the ground feet first, thereby declaring himself down.
1986
  • Blocking below the waist on punts is prohibited during the entire down.
  • The "lure" technique is prohibited. When a tackle shows pass set, a teammate lined up outside him cannot chop a defender who is lined up over the tackle, even if the tackle and defender are not engaged (a "lure").
1987
  • An offensive lineman may not clip a defender who, at the snap, is aligned on the line of scrimmage opposite another offensive lineman who is more than one position away, when the defender is responding to the flow of the ball away from the blocker. Example: A tackle cannot clip the nose tackle on sweep to the opposite side.
  • It is illegal for the kicking team to block below the waist after a free kick or punt has been made. (Low blocks by the receiving team became illegal in 1979).
  • Both teams are prohibited from blocking below the waist after a change of possession.
1989
  • A defender (approaching from any direction) who has an unrestricted path to the quarterback is prohibited from flagrantly hitting him in the area of the knee(s).
1990
  • A player who butts, spears, or rams an opponent may be disqualified if the action is flagrant or vicious.
1991
  • Officials will whistle the play dead whenever a defensive lineman clearly penetrates beyond the neutral zone before the ball is snapped and continues unabated toward the quarterback.
1992
  • For the first time the Chop Block is illegal on some running players: It is illegal on a running play for an offensive player who is lined up in the backfield at the snap to deliberately block a defensive player in the thigh or lower (chop) if the defensive player is engaged by an offensive player who was on the line of scrimmage at the snap. This action is prohibited whether on or behind the line of scrimmage in an area that extends laterally to the position originally occupied by the tight end on either side.
  • When a defensive player runs forward and leaps in an attempt to block an extra point or field goal, it is a foul only if the leaping player lands on other players.
1993
  • It is not intentional grounding when a passer, while out of the pocket and facing an imminent loss of yardage, throws a pass that lands beyond the line of scrimmage, even if no offensive player has a realistic chance to catch the ball (including if the ball lands out of bounds over the sideline or end line).
1994
  • Defensive players are prohibited from blocking low during a punt, field goal, or extra point attempt (kick), except those defensive players at the snap that are lined up on or inside the normal tight end position. Previously, all players on the defensive team could block low during the field goal or extra point attempt.
1995
  • Protection for defenseless players is clarified and expanded. Since 1982, a defensive player was prohibited from using the crown or top of his helmet against a passer, a receiver in the act of catching a pass, or a runner who is in the grasp of a tackler. The clarification provided that:
    • Defenseless players included a kickoff or punt returner attempting to field a kick in the air, and a player on the ground at the end of a play.
    • Defensive players are prohibited from lowering their heads to make forcible contact with the facemask, or with the "hairline" or forehead part of the helmet, against an opponent, instead of only with the top/crown.
    • Defensive players are prohibited from forcibly hitting the defenseless player's head, neck, or face with the helmet or facemask.
    • Defensive players are prohibited from launching into a defenseless player in a way that causes the defensive player's helmet or facemask to forcibly strike the defenseless player's head, neck, or face, even if the initial contact of the defender's helmet or facemask is lower than the defenseless player's neck.
  • When tackling a passer during or just after throwing a pass, a defensive player is prohibited from unnecessarily and violently throwing him down and landing on top of him with all or most of the defender's weight.
1996
  • On running plays, a chop block is prohibited by an offensive player who is aligned more than one position away from the engaged defender when the block occurs away from the flow of the play.
  • A defender cannot be chopped even after he has disengaged from an offensive opponent, if he is still confronting the offensive player.
  • Prohibition of the "lure" technique is applicable all along the offensive line, instead of only to a player outside a tackle.
1998
  • All face shields must be transparent.
1999
  • Blocking from behind, at, or below the knees in the clipping zone is prohibited.
  • After a blocking attempt in close line play, a blocker is prohibited from rolling up on the back of a defender's legs (Unnecessary Roughness).
2002
  • The Chop Block technique is illegal on all kicking plays.
  • It is illegal to hit a quarterback helmet-to-helmet any time after a change of possession.
2005
  • It is illegal to grab the inside collar of the shoulder pads to tackle a runner ("horse-collar tackle").
  • Unnecessarily running, diving into, or throwing the body against a player who should not have reasonably anticipated such contact by an opponent is unnecessary roughness. Previously, the rule only protected a player who is out of the play.
  • A kicker/punter must not be unnecessarily contacted by the receiving team through the end of the play or until he assumes a distinctly defensive position. An opponent may not unnecessarily initiate helmet-to-helmet contact to the kicker/punter during the kick or during the return.
  • An offensive player who is aligned in the tackle box at the snap and moves to a position outside the box is prohibited from initiating contact on the side or below the waist of an opponent if the blocker is moving toward his own end line and approaches the opponent from behind or from the side ("Peel Back Block"). The near shoulder of the blocker must be in front of his opponent's body.
2006
  • Low hits on the quarterback are prohibited when a rushing defender has an opportunity to avoid such contact.
  • Blocks in the back above the waist by the kicking team while the ball is in flight during a scrimmage kick are illegal.
  • The definition of a "horse collar tackle" is expanded to include grabbing the inside collar of the jersey.
  • During a field-goal attempt or a try, a defensive player who is within one yard of the line of scrimmage at the snap must have his helmet outside the snapper's shoulder pad.
  • Personal or unsportsmanlike conduct fouls that occur during halftime or during intermission between fourth period and an overtime period will be penalized on the ensuing kickoff.
  • During a free kick, at least four kicking team players must be on each side of the kicker when the ball is kicked.
2007
  • A block below the waist against an eligible receiver while the quarterback is in the pocket is a 15-yard penalty instead of a 5-yard penalty (an illegal cut block).
2009
  • Teams are not permitted to intentionally form a wedge of more than two players on a kickoff return in an attempt to block for the runner. Penalty: 15 yards.
  • The "bunch" formation on kickoffs is eliminated. The kickoff team must have at least three players outside each hash mark, one of whom must be outside the yard-line number.
  • It is an illegal "blindside" block if the blocker is moving toward his own endline and approaches the opponent from behind or from the side, and the initial force of the contact by the blocker's helmet, forearm, or shoulder is to the head or neck area of an opponent. Penalty: 15-yards.
  • It is an illegal hit on a defenseless receiver if the initial force of the contact by the defender's helmet, forearm, or shoulder is to the head or neck area of the receiver. Penalty: 15 yards.
  • Clarified rule regarding low hits on passers:
    • A defender cannot initiate a roll or lunge and forcibly hit the passer in the knee area or below, even if he is being contacted by another player.
    • It is not a foul if the defender swipes, wraps, or grabs a passer in the knee area or below in an attempt to tackle him.
2010
  • During a field-goal attempt, punt, or try-kick, a defensive team player, who is within one yard of line of scrimmage at snap, must have his entire body outside the snapper's shoulder pads.
  • After a half has expired, dead ball personal fouls by either team will be enforced on the succeeding kickoff.
  • A player who has just completed a catch is protected from blows to the head or neck by an opponent who launches.
  • All "defenseless players" are protected from blows to the head delivered by an opponent's helmet, forearm, or shoulder.
  • Kickers and punters during the kick and return, and quarterbacks after a change of possession, are protected from blows to the head delivered by an opponent's helmet, forearm, or shoulder, instead of just helmet-to-helmet contact.
  • The ball is declared dead at the spot if a runner's helmet comes completely off.
2011
  • The restraining line for the kicking team is moved from the 30- to the 35-yard line in an effort to increase touchbacks.
  • All kicking team players other than the kicker must be lined up no more than five yards behind their restraining line, eliminating the 15-20 yard running "head start" that had become customary for many players.
  • The list of "defenseless players" is expanded to include a kicker/punter during the kick or during the return, a quarterback at any time after a change of possession, and a player who receives a "blindside" block when the blocker is moving toward his own endline and approaches the opponent from behind or from the side. Previously, these players were protected against blows to the head, but not against blows delivered by an opponent with the top/crown or forehead/"hairline" parts of the helmet against other parts of the body.
  • A receiver who has completed a catch is a "defenseless player" until he has had time to protect himself or has clearly become a runner. A receiver/runner is no longer defenseless if he is able to avoid or ward off the impending contact of an opponent. Previously, the receiver who had completed a catch was protected against an opponent who launched and delivered a blow to the receiver's head.
2012
  • The list of "defenseless players" is expanded to include defensive players on crackback blocks, making it illegal to hit them in the head or neck area.
  • Players are required to wear protective knee and thigh pads beginning with the 2013 season.
Last updated on May 25, 2012
Reply/Quote
#39
(03-22-2016, 01:04 PM)6andcounting Wrote: The problem fans (that includes Carolina, Baltimore and the countless other teams the guy has been flagged or fined for illegal hits) have with Burfict is that he continues to make illegal hits. No one cares about his hard, legal hits. Now the Bengal fans here have a mental and emotional breakdown every time a Steeler makes a hard hit even when it's legal. That's what separates bengal fan whining from say Panthers fans being mad at Burfict for getting fined for twisting ankles after the play.

Rolleyes

Burfict attempted to dodge Brown, but Brown had his head tilted to the side and still only Burfict's shoulder hit his helmet.

You didn't mention that specifically, but I'm pretty sure that's what you were referring to since we're discussing the playoff game.

There was no dirty intent, or even intent to hit him.
Reply/Quote
#40
(03-22-2016, 05:56 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: Doesn't work that way.

...except when Bengals fans are excusing Ms Pac Mans leveling of the ref by blaming it on Porter being on the field.

Then, for Bengals fans, it does work that way.
Reply/Quote





Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)