The fake case that the SC ruled on this week

[GMDino]

(07-03-2023, 02:59 PM)Leon Wrote: says someone who is obvious dont know nothing about righteous anger , standing up to things that go against God. 

remember Jesus had righteous anger in the temple and the lame and blind came to him. they were cured. in our day there are many lame and blind but in differnet ways. believers must use righteous anger to stand up against things the go against God. and hopefully we can cure some of the sickness in the process by turning them to rightousness. 

dont accuse someone of not being Christian if you dont even understand righteous anger and why its important or why we need to turn folks to God before its to late

I fully understand.

It's clear that anyone who writes "we are standing our ground and fighting back now. and the seculars hate it cause theyve had the power for way too long." does not understand why Jesus was angry at the money changers or American history.

[Lucidus]

(07-02-2023, 11:38 AM)GMDino Wrote: No thread on this one yet.

https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-gay-rights-lgbtq-website-385ec911ce0ca2f415966078eddb66da?taid=64a0aecf7bcbb300015c49f5&utm_campaign=TrueAnthem&utm_medium=AP&utm_source=Twitter


So I guess we can just make up scenarios and the SC to rule on them?

This case demonstrated an utterly disgraceful eagerness by the Court's majority -- in a matter that should have never been granted standing -- to issue what is basically an advisory opinion intended to denigrate same-sex marriage, and more broadly speaking, LGBTQIA+ rights in general. Such an opinion only continues to embolden the extremist groups - and the ADF in particular - to even more confidently, advocate and litigate for the right to discriminate.