Why did the Bengals fail to address the roster mid season?

[*ochocincos*]

(01-15-2019, 05:49 PM)Benton Wrote: Honestly, I haven't paid that much attention to other teams this year, but I'm guessing the difference is those teams were a player or two off from what the organization felt like they needed. The Bengals (largely due to coaching) were more than just a linebacker away from being solid.  I mean, we could've added Tate, sure, but would he have done much that someone here wasn't already doing? I don't think so.

The Bengals were two LBs, an interior rusher, a RG, a RT, and a TE away. They could have added a player or two, but it would have resulted in maybe a winning record or making the playoffs.
A trade only made sense if it was going to be for a player who the Bengals would have for more than the rest of the 2018 season.

[XenoMorph]

(01-16-2019, 12:02 PM)jj22 Wrote: I don' think this is true...

the cap is available money towards your roster...  THE ENTIRE Roster....   usually cap sites only include the top 51 or so