Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why is Jeff Driskel still on the roster?
#1
Are the Bengals eyeing a trade? I literally see no point in them having Jeff Driskel unless they aren't feeling good about the o-line guarding Andy and think that he has a good chance of injury due to the hits he's been taking.

Why else would we have cut DeShawn Williams instead of Jeff Driskel, a 3rd-string QB.
Former Contributor for StripeHype

CEO/Founder of CUE Sports Media

Reply/Quote
#2
They like his physical tools and they're holding him for an extended look. He's probably the biggest piece of evidence that McCarron will likely be shopped come March. It's a low risk move. The 53rd man rarely plays anyway.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
Reply/Quote
#3
Why is Jeff Driskel still on the roster?

Who is Jeff Driskel?



[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
#4
(11-26-2016, 08:52 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: They like his physical tools and they're holding him for an extended look. He's probably the biggest piece of evidence that McCarron will likely be shopped come March. It's a low risk move. The 53rd man rarely plays anyway.

Yep, a McCarron trade has to happen or Bengals will just let him walk for nothing in return after next season.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

The water tastes funny when you're far from your home,
yet it's only the thirsty that hunger to roam. 
          Roam the Jungle !
Reply/Quote
#5
(11-26-2016, 08:36 PM)milksheikh Wrote: Are the Bengals eyeing a trade? I literally see no point in them having Jeff Driskel unless they aren't feeling good about the o-line guarding Andy and think that he has a good chance of injury due to the hits he's been taking.

Why else would we have cut DeShawn Williams instead of Jeff Driskel, a 3rd-string QB.

Sex appeal. :wink:

[Image: 2574630.png&w=350&h=254]

[Image: cinsigfin.png]
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
#6
They don't want to be caught flat footed again and have to pass up on a great trade because there isn't a plan b. Unfortunately the Vikings/Oakland situation doesn't come around all that often and they won't get a mega offer again. Too little too late.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]

Quote:"Success doesn’t mean every single move they make is good" ~ Anonymous 
"Let not the dumb have to educate" ~ jj22
Reply/Quote
#7
(11-27-2016, 12:44 AM)CINwillWIN Wrote: Sex appeal. :wink:

[Image: 2574630.png&w=350&h=254]

[Image: th?id=OIP.M143caf6c4f83f43de3eb0d04ee4d3...=300&h=300]
[Image: 51209558878_91a895e0bb_m.jpg]
Reply/Quote
#8
Just go ahead and trade Macaroni to Cleveland already.

It's in the division, but with that Browns O-line his career will be ended quicker than our own sieve line.

C'mon Hue...

Baby needs another high round CB !

[Image: th?id=OIP.M978971b30d1c9d7c2c083312cb3ad...=300&h=300]
[Image: 51209558878_91a895e0bb_m.jpg]
Reply/Quote
#9
(11-27-2016, 10:17 AM)BengalsRocker Wrote: [Image: th?id=OIP.M143caf6c4f83f43de3eb0d04ee4d3...=300&h=300]

[Image: 49689078.jpg]
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
#10
(11-26-2016, 08:52 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: They like his physical tools and they're holding him for an extended look. He's probably the biggest piece of evidence that McCarron will likely be shopped come March. It's a low risk move. The 53rd man rarely plays anyway.

Yep...or simply they're grooming him as our backup QB once McCarron leaves.

It's not a terrible idea...I just don't know if Driskel will pan out.
Reply/Quote
#11
(11-27-2016, 06:15 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: Yep...or simply they're grooming him as our backup QB once McCarron leaves.

It's not a terrible idea...I just don't know if Driskel will pan out.

That was my thought.  We'll trade AJ in the offseason and have a guy with time in the system already, eliminating the need to draft a guy.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)