![]() |
It's insanity! The war on Christianity...... - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Off Topic Forums (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Off-Topic-Forums) +--- Forum: Politics & Religion 2.0 (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Politics-Religion-2-0) +---- Forum: P & R Archive (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-P-R-Archive) +---- Thread: It's insanity! The war on Christianity...... (/Thread-It-s-insanity-The-war-on-Christianity) |
RE: It's insanity! The war on Christianity...... - XenoMorph - 10-15-2015 (10-15-2015, 01:07 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Simple answer is good means righteous "justifiable". The longer answers are it is used in the context of Holy or as KP said some believe it is the word God that got changed. All just stolen pagan celebrations... to help comform a people RE: It's insanity! The war on Christianity...... - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 10-15-2015 (10-15-2015, 12:37 PM)PhilHos Wrote: No. Do you follow all the rules of the Bible? No. Why. Because the rules changed. Who changed them? God. When you get to make the rules you get to make the rules any way you want. The number of ways god could have changed the rules for your salvation which don't involve human sacrifice are infinite. Yet, he chose the path which involved murder which is against his own rules. RE: It's insanity! The war on Christianity...... - bfine32 - 10-15-2015 (10-15-2015, 01:32 PM)XenoMorph Wrote: All just stolen pagan celebrations... to help comform a people Did you quote the right post? RE: It's insanity! The war on Christianity...... - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 10-15-2015 (10-15-2015, 12:43 PM)PhilHos Wrote: No, because humans weren't doing what God commanded. Against their free will? (10-15-2015, 12:41 PM)bfine32 Wrote: No, so people wouldn't think they are equal to God Which one was it? RE: It's insanity! The war on Christianity...... - bfine32 - 10-15-2015 (10-15-2015, 01:40 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Against their free will? Read the part of Phil's quoted scripture that states "so that we may make a name for ourselves". I would say I posted the cause and Phil posted the effect. WTS. Not everybody that reads the same verse of scripture interprets it the same. Hell not even the same person always interprets a verse of scripture the same everytime they read it. RE: It's insanity! The war on Christianity...... - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 10-15-2015 (10-15-2015, 01:44 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Read the part of Phil's quoted scripture that states "so that we may make a name for ourselves". Fair enough. RE: It's insanity! The war on Christianity...... - WhoDeyWho - 10-15-2015 (10-15-2015, 12:07 PM)GMDino Wrote: Which totally explains the Tower of Babble story... One of the most bizarre stories in the Bible in my opinion. RE: It's insanity! The war on Christianity...... - Belsnickel - 10-15-2015 (10-15-2015, 04:19 PM)WhoDeyWho Wrote: One of the most bizarre stories in the Bible in my opinion. Then you've not had the pleasure of reading Revelations, my friend. ![]() RE: It's insanity! The war on Christianity...... - WhoDeyWho - 10-15-2015 (10-15-2015, 12:43 PM)PhilHos Wrote: No, because humans weren't doing what God commanded. If indeed this is the case and God doesn't mind interfering with the "free will" of man for his own purposes, why did he not change the language of the serpent so that Eve could not be tempted by it? He did tell them not to eat from the tree didn't he? Isn't their disobedience supposedly the reason we have "sin", death, clothes, and misery today? In modern days, serpents don't talk to people so how big of a deal would it had been for serpents not to talk to people then? RE: It's insanity! The war on Christianity...... - WhoDeyWho - 10-15-2015 (10-15-2015, 04:26 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: Then you've not had the pleasure of reading Revelations, my friend. I said "one of the most". RE: It's insanity! The war on Christianity...... - PhilHos - 10-15-2015 (10-15-2015, 01:35 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Do you follow all the rules of the Bible? No. Why. Because the rules changed. Who changed them? God. When you get to make the rules you get to make the rules any way you want. The number of ways god could have changed the rules for your salvation which don't involve human sacrifice are infinite. Yet, he chose the path which involved murder which is against his own rules. There's so much wrong with this, but I'm just too tired to go through the effort to have you either ignore my answer or look for some other tactic of attack. (10-15-2015, 01:40 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Against their free will? (10-15-2015, 04:27 PM)WhoDeyWho Wrote: If indeed this is the case and God doesn't mind interfering with the "free will" of man for his own purposes, why did he not change the language of the serpent so that Eve could not be tempted by it? He did tell them not to eat from the tree didn't he? Isn't their disobedience supposedly the reason we have "sin", death, clothes, and misery today? God didn't interfere with their free will. He just changed the language that they spoke. As to the serpent in the garden of Eden, assuming the story to be literally true, it was a test to see if Adam and Eve would follow the 1 rule that God gave them to follow. As we all know, they failed that test. RE: It's insanity! The war on Christianity...... - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 10-15-2015 (10-15-2015, 06:35 PM)PhilHos Wrote: There's so much wrong with this, but I'm just too tired to go through the effort to have you either ignore my answer or look for some other tactic of attack. Yes, God tested their ability to know right from wrong before they ate from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil which would give them the ability to know right from wrong after they ate from it. Another famous logical fallacy. RE: It's insanity! The war on Christianity...... - PhilHos - 10-15-2015 (10-15-2015, 07:24 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Yes, God tested their ability to know right from wrong before they ate from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil which would give them the ability to know right from wrong after they ate from it. Another famous logical fallacy. Except God already TOLD them it was wrong to eat from the tree. They didn't need to eat from the tree to know it was wrong to eat from the tree if God already told them it was wrong to eat from the tree. RE: It's insanity! The war on Christianity...... - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 10-15-2015 (10-15-2015, 07:40 PM)PhilHos Wrote: Except God already TOLD them it was wrong to eat from the tree. They didn't need to eat from the tree to know it was wrong to eat from the tree if God already told them it was wrong to eat from the tree. He didn't tell them it was wrong. He told them not to do it. If you don't have a conscience to tell the difference between right and wrong it doesn't matter. Sociopath's don't have a conscience and you can tell them the difference between right and wrong and it doesn't matter. RE: It's insanity! The war on Christianity...... - PhilHos - 10-15-2015 (10-15-2015, 07:45 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: He didn't tell them it was wrong. He told them not to do it. Same thing. They knew not to eat it. (10-15-2015, 07:45 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: If you don't have a conscience to tell the difference between right and wrong it doesn't matter. If someone tells you not to do something, you already know that it's wrong if you do what you're not supposed to do. (10-15-2015, 07:45 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Sociopath's don't have a conscience and you can tell them the difference between right and wrong and it doesn't matter. Sociopath's know the difference between right and wrong. It's just they feel no shame or remorse when they do somethinig wrong. RE: It's insanity! The war on Christianity...... - GodHatesBengals - 10-15-2015 (10-15-2015, 07:40 PM)PhilHos Wrote: Except God already TOLD them it was wrong to eat from the tree. They didn't need to eat from the tree to know it was wrong to eat from the tree if God already told them it was wrong to eat from the tree. Ever found it kinda funny that the first sin was aspiring to know things? RE: It's insanity! The war on Christianity...... - WhoDeyWho - 10-15-2015 (10-15-2015, 06:35 PM)PhilHos Wrote: There's so much wrong with this, but I'm just too tired to go through the effort to have you either ignore my answer or look for some other tactic of attack. God sabotaged their free-will plans by making it so they could not communicate. Why else would he have done it? He even admitted to it supposedly fearing what they could accomplish. It is in the bible. And why would a god with perfect knowledge "test" anyone? He already knows the answer, so it becomes a pointless exercise. RE: It's insanity! The war on Christianity...... - bfine32 - 10-15-2015 (10-15-2015, 11:01 PM)WhoDeyWho Wrote: God sabotaged their free-will plans by making it so they could not communicate. Why else would he have done it? He even admitted to it supposedly fearing what they could accomplish. It is in the bible. Where is God "being afraid of what man could accomplish" in the Bible? The story of the Tower of Babel is one, in which, God shows his displeasure in what man thinks he can do. They think they can build a tower to heaven and become like God. He shows them how wrong they are. Not sure where he ever feared what they could do. RE: It's insanity! The war on Christianity...... - GodHatesBengals - 10-16-2015 (10-15-2015, 11:35 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Where is God "being afraid of what man could accomplish" in the Bible? Keep going. Everybody loves a good bedtime story. RE: It's insanity! The war on Christianity...... - GMDino - 10-16-2015 (10-15-2015, 11:35 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Where is God "being afraid of what man could accomplish" in the Bible?https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+11 Quote:Genesis 11New International Version (NIV) *I* see a story that tries to explain why people from different areas speak different languages. But if you want to take it literally God didn't want people working together because when they did they could do anything. And for reasons on he knows that would be bad. |