+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Cincinnati-Bengals-NFL)
+--- Forum: Draft Central (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Draft-Central)
+--- Thread: Draft/FA positional value? (/Thread-Draft-FA-positional-value)
Pages:
1
2
RE: Draft/FA positional value? - ochocincos - 02-16-2018
(02-16-2018, 01:47 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Ok, I can agree with that. I thought you were stating how the Bengals viewed positional value.
Yea I guess I admittedly did a mix of both. They needed a dominant LB (typically at WILL) based on their longtime scheme that mimicked the early-2000's TB teams.
And they don't necessarily NEED a dominant TE, as they went years and years without one and still put up numbers because of very good WR1, WR2, and/or RB.
Need for a guy like Eifert only magnified when the blocking scheme forced a bad run game and then a lack of receiving talent once Jones and Sanu left.
But based on your feedback, I've moved TE1 up into the same tier as WILL, as it probably should be.