The Democratic Party has moved too far to the left. - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Off Topic Forums (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Off-Topic-Forums) +--- Forum: Politics & Religion 2.0 (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Politics-Religion-2-0) +---- Forum: P & R Archive (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-P-R-Archive) +---- Thread: The Democratic Party has moved too far to the left. (/Thread-The-Democratic-Party-has-moved-too-far-to-the-left) |
RE: The Democratic Party has moved too far to the left. - hollodero - 11-25-2019 (11-25-2019, 09:35 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Those Republicans are stupid. A smart Republican would say "Hell no!!, they haven't moved far enough Left." Ah-ha! But does the smart republican really wish for Trump to be reelected. RE: The Democratic Party has moved too far to the left. - Belsnickel - 11-25-2019 (11-25-2019, 09:25 PM)Crazyjdawg Wrote: I mean, there's no doubt that the party is moving to the left. 10 years ago, the Democrats were not talking about universal healthcare, debt free college or any of the other policies mentioned in this post, at least not on a significant scale like we're seeing today. I don't disagree with you, but what I'm saying is the perception of "too far" to the left is based upon the OW shift. I agree that there is a movement towards more progressive policies, but that movement is coming after there has been a decades long shift to the right. RE: The Democratic Party has moved too far to the left. - bfine32 - 11-25-2019 (11-25-2019, 09:39 PM)hollodero Wrote: Ah-ha! But does the smart republican really wish for Trump to be reelected. Yes, unless another conservative steps up. Bless her, but RBG can only hang in there so long. RE: The Democratic Party has moved too far to the left. - Benton - 11-25-2019 The same can be said for the right. Not every Republican is pro big business or pro segregation. Partied are typically judged by the extremes, even if that doesn't adequately reflect the majority. I know in Kentucky a lot of Republican voters were dumbfounded when state level gop started cutting taxes on the wealthy and expanding taxes on everyone. Along with passing right to work laws. RE: The Democratic Party has moved too far to the left. - hollodero - 11-26-2019 (11-25-2019, 09:49 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Yes, unless another conservative steps up. Bless her, but RBG can only hang in there so long. Ah, so the smart conservative thinks a judge is more important than honor and integrity in the white house? RE: The Democratic Party has moved too far to the left. - GMDino - 11-26-2019 (11-26-2019, 11:08 AM)hollodero Wrote: Ah, so the smart conservative thinks a judge is more important than honor and integrity in the white house? Of course. The gop wants to politicize the courts like they have everything else. Then we can get back to being a "Christian nation" under the thumb of the Republican party. RE: The Democratic Party has moved too far to the left. - hollodero - 11-26-2019 (11-26-2019, 11:24 AM)GMDino Wrote: Of course. The gop wants to politicize the courts like they have everything else. In fairness, I blame your constitution for that. Creating an "independent" third branch full of political appointees that distinctly belong to one side. And chance by death determines the SC's composition, leading to some very cynical viewpoints from both sides. Brilliantly thought out by 18th century farmers, sorry I meant framers. I can be so snippy, I am a strange foreigner. I'm just surprised a judge is more important than having a president who is not an uneducated, ethics-free egomaniac and hate-spreader and extorter and deeply embarrassing figure, in the end also courtesy of your great constitution. Never change a letter. RE: The Democratic Party has moved too far to the left. - GMDino - 11-26-2019 (11-26-2019, 11:57 AM)hollodero Wrote: In fairness, I blame your constitution for that. Creating an "independent" third branch full of political appointees that distinctly belong to one side. And chance by death determines the SC's composition, leading to some very cynical viewpoints from both sides. Brilliantly thought out by 18th century farmers, sorry I meant framers. I can be so snippy, I am a strange foreigner. Not to mention when one decides to step down and name his own replacement (Kennedy - Kavanaugh) and there is nothing that can be done about it because the gop puts party over people. I would hope that Trump would awaken some kind of civic pride in people to never let someone like him happen again but 30-40% of republicans still support him no matter what he does. RE: The Democratic Party has moved too far to the left. - hollodero - 11-26-2019 (11-26-2019, 12:00 PM)GMDino Wrote: Not to mention when one decides to step down and name his own replacement (Kennedy - Kavanaugh) and there is nothing that can be done about it because the gop puts party over people. 30-40% of republicans? That number seems way too low. RE: The Democratic Party has moved too far to the left. - GMDino - 11-26-2019 (11-26-2019, 12:14 PM)hollodero Wrote: 30-40% of republicans? That number seems way too low. Those are the ones that poll consistently never straying from Trump and the gop. 90-95% will vote for him no matter what. RE: The Democratic Party has moved too far to the left. - hollodero - 11-26-2019 (11-26-2019, 12:27 PM)GMDino Wrote: Those are the ones that poll consistently never straying from Trump and the gop. Well, there are supreme court vacancies on the line, so. Meanwhile, Trump is banking on the loyalty of "his" SC judges. But I'm sure that won't cause any trouble down the line. -- I am well aware that I killed the thread's main topic... to that effect though, one party might or might not be too left, but the other one is definitely way too deep into Trumpism. They are about to let him get away with obstruction, abuse of power and extortion, none of which is an exaggeration. Makes it hard for me to frown upon Democrats, that at least seem to uphold some principles - even when Schiff probably was untruthful when he claimed "we're better than that". As of now, no you're not. That being said, abolishing all private insurance seems a bit too far left for the US indeed. Why protecting the environment is somehow "left" in the first place escapes me, however. RE: The Democratic Party has moved too far to the left. - bfine32 - 11-26-2019 (11-26-2019, 11:08 AM)hollodero Wrote: Ah, so the smart conservative thinks a judge is more important than honor and integrity in the white house? Well it is why i said "unless another conservative runs". We are not electing Pope. It's easy to shake your fist; it's refreshing to see the Left sudddenly so concerned about morality. Which do you consider more important? RE: The Democratic Party has moved too far to the left. - hollodero - 11-26-2019 (11-26-2019, 02:07 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Well it is why i said "unless another conservative runs". Yeah well, that perspective is not rooted in reality. In reality, the GOP does not quite allow for a contender, and third party stands no chance. Also, Trump is too popular among republicans. But I'm sure they're all very smart. (11-26-2019, 02:07 PM)bfine32 Wrote: it's refreshing to see the Left sudddenly so concerned about morality. What's that supposed to mean? Did the left not care about morality before? Were they always fine with extorting other countries for campaign dirt before? (11-26-2019, 02:07 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Which do you consider more important? Well, since your current WH is swarming with shady figures and shady deals and is epicly embarrassing, I'd focus on that first and foremost. Oh, also it pulls "your" party, dare I say, into this mud with it. Conservativism is morphing into Trumpism and that might as well become the conservatives' future, and there are some obvious, egregious downsides to that. Is what I'd consider. RE: The Democratic Party has moved too far to the left. - TheLeonardLeap - 11-26-2019 (11-26-2019, 11:57 AM)hollodero Wrote: In fairness, I blame your constitution for that. Creating an "independent" third branch full of political appointees that distinctly belong to one side. And chance by death determines the SC's composition, leading to some very cynical viewpoints from both sides. Brilliantly thought out by 18th century farmers, sorry I meant framers. I can be so snippy, I am a strange foreigner. Hey, watch your tone mister. Just because you gave the world Arnold Schwarzenegger doesn't mean we forget you also gave the world Hitler. RE: The Democratic Party has moved too far to the left. - hollodero - 11-26-2019 (11-26-2019, 02:47 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Hey, watch your tone mister. Just because you gave the world Arnold Schwarzenegger doesn't mean we forget you also gave the world Hitler. Well... we're at least trending in the right direction. RE: The Democratic Party has moved too far to the left. - bfine32 - 11-26-2019 (11-26-2019, 02:37 PM)hollodero Wrote: Yeah well, that perspective is not rooted in reality. In reality, the GOP does not quite allow for a contender, and third party stands no chance. Also, Trump is too popular among republicans. But I'm sure they're all very smart. It's almost like politics. RE: The Democratic Party has moved too far to the left. - hollodero - 11-26-2019 (11-26-2019, 03:03 PM)bfine32 Wrote: It's almost like politics. Nah, it really isn't. I declare that statement ostrichism. RE: The Democratic Party has moved too far to the left. - bfine32 - 11-26-2019 (11-26-2019, 03:14 PM)hollodero Wrote: Nah, it really isn't. I declare that statement ostrichism. Quote:Definition of politics Which one is it "not really"? RE: The Democratic Party has moved too far to the left. - Dill - 11-26-2019 (11-26-2019, 03:17 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Which one is it "not really"? The one not listed in your above post; the one you were actually using. RE: The Democratic Party has moved too far to the left. - Dill - 11-26-2019 (11-25-2019, 09:47 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: I don't disagree with you, but what I'm saying is the perception of "too far" to the left is based upon the OW shift. I agree that there is a movement towards more progressive policies, but that movement is coming after there has been a decades long shift to the right. Yes, and that shift to the right was accompanied by a purge of sorts, so the Republican party has long been "purer" than the Democratic. If one goes by the news discourse, especially from the right, that great shift right also expands what is called "the left" to now include centrist positions. Think of Arlen Specter and Jim Jeffords. By the time Boehner retired, he was a RINO. It's like you are in a train station looking out the window at another train (party). It starts moving and you think your own train (party) is. |