Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise
Blaze pink - Printable Version

+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Off Topic Forums (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Off-Topic-Forums)
+--- Forum: Politics & Religion 2.0 (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Politics-Religion-2-0)
+---- Forum: P & R Archive (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-P-R-Archive)
+---- Thread: Blaze pink (/Thread-Blaze-pink)

Pages: 1 2 3


RE: Blaze pink - Griever - 05-25-2016

(05-25-2016, 10:44 AM)BigPapaKain Wrote: Wait wait wait - pink is for women?

Excuse me gentlemen - I have to go trim my shirt drawer down.

do you wear pink on the days you feel like ID'ing as a woman? Ninja LMAO


RE: Blaze pink - BigPapaKain - 05-25-2016

(05-25-2016, 11:19 AM)Griever Wrote: do you wear pink on the days you feel like ID'ing as a woman? Ninja LMAO

Mostly on days where dark red would bring too much heat from the sun down on me.

I have no interest in IDing as a woman. Except in 3rd person games because if I have to look at someone's ass while I'm gaming, it's gonna be a female's.


RE: Blaze pink - BigPapaKain - 05-25-2016

(05-25-2016, 10:56 AM)michaelsean Wrote: You owe me one.

Which one do you want? I have a Sleeping Beauty t-shirt and a Harley Quinn longsleeve. Not sure why that one is pink, but the art on it is awesome.


RE: Blaze pink - michaelsean - 05-25-2016

(05-25-2016, 11:21 AM)BigPapaKain Wrote: Which one do you want? I have a Sleeping Beauty t-shirt and a Harley Quinn longsleeve. Not sure why that one is pink, but the art on it is awesome.

Can't go wrong with Sleeping Beauty.


RE: Blaze pink - Rotobeast - 05-25-2016

(05-25-2016, 11:35 AM)michaelsean Wrote: Can't go wrong with Sleeping Beauty.

Blasphemy !
Harley Quinn is the only choice here.
You failed the litmus test.
Ninja


RE: Blaze pink - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 05-25-2016

Looks like Minnesota's state and local tax revenue from hunting licenses was $93 million in 2011.  While Colorado's tax revenue was $996 million from marijuana sales in 2015.

Should Minnesota's State Representatives get into Mary Jane selling business for the increased revenue?  I guess we can save the medical tourism for abortions discussions after Oklahoma outlaws abortions?


RE: Blaze pink - bfine32 - 05-25-2016

(05-25-2016, 01:02 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Looks like Minnesota's state and local tax revenue from hunting licenses was $93 million in 2011.  While Colorado's tax revenue was $996 million from marijuana sales in 2015.

Should Minnesota's State Representatives get into Mary Jane selling business for the increased revenue?  I guess we can save the medical tourism for abortions discussions after Oklahoma outlaws abortions?

Who knows Minnesota might want to increase revenue with breaking Federal Law; but it is something to consider.


RE: Blaze pink - michaelsean - 05-25-2016

(05-25-2016, 12:04 PM)Rotobeast Wrote: Blasphemy !
Harley Quinn is the only choice here.
You failed the litmus test.
Ninja

Oh look another Harley Quinn bandwagon fanboy.  You guys are a dime a dozen.


RE: Blaze pink - RICHMONDBENGAL_07 - 05-25-2016

Again this rates a zero on my giveaf*ckometer Shocked


RE: Blaze pink - Rotobeast - 05-25-2016

(05-25-2016, 01:36 PM)michaelsean Wrote: Oh look another Harley Quinn bandwagon fanboy.  You guys are a dime a dozen.

*points at ninja*
Actually, I've never been a D.C. fan.
However, I have about 2k comics from the 80's and 90's to prove I'm not a fanboy-come-lately.
Wink


RE: Blaze pink - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 05-25-2016

(05-25-2016, 01:13 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Who knows Minnesota might want to increase revenue with breaking Federal Law; but it is something to consider.

Let's review . . .

(05-24-2016, 08:47 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Anything that brings revenue to the sate should be a State Representative's job.

(05-24-2016, 08:51 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Anything?

(05-24-2016, 08:55 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Yes

State's rights . . . throw it up!


RE: Blaze pink - michaelsean - 05-25-2016

(05-25-2016, 03:24 PM)Rotobeast Wrote: *points at ninja*
Actually, I've never been a D.C. fan.
However, I have about 2k comics from the 80's and 90's to prove I'm not a fanboy-come-lately.
Wink

I don't even know who or what Harley Quinn is.   Hilarious


RE: Blaze pink - Griever - 05-25-2016

(05-25-2016, 03:28 PM)michaelsean Wrote: I don't even know who or what Harley Quinn is.   Hilarious

google it you muggle


RE: Blaze pink - GMDino - 05-25-2016

(05-25-2016, 03:28 PM)michaelsean Wrote: I don't even know who or what Harley Quinn is.   Hilarious

I was going to post a picture of Kevin Smith's daughter as a joke...but I don't think she's legal yet.

Sooooo.....

http://comicbook.com/2015/05/05/harley-quinn-co-creator-bruce-timm-reacts-to-margot-robbies-suic/


RE: Blaze pink - Belsnickel - 05-25-2016

(05-25-2016, 04:19 PM)GMDino Wrote: I was going to post a picture of Kevin Smith's daughter as a joke...but I don't think she's legal yet.

Sooooo.....

http://comicbook.com/2015/05/05/harley-quinn-co-creator-bruce-timm-reacts-to-margot-robbies-suic/

Yeah, she's only 16. I say only, but that makes me feel old to say that she is 16.


RE: Blaze pink - GMDino - 05-25-2016

(05-25-2016, 04:21 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: Yeah, she's only 16. I say only, but that makes me feel old to say that she is 16.

You feel even older when you have an 18 year old daughter.   Smirk


RE: Blaze pink - bfine32 - 05-25-2016

(05-25-2016, 03:27 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Let's review . . .




State's rights . . . throw it up!

Review all you want; as my point has remained unchanged: Anything that can produce revenue to a state should be the business of a State rerensentative and should be considered. I know you wish I had said they should do or approve anything to increase revenue; unfortunately, I did not. Did you really think someone didn't see your feeble attempt at "gotcha" when you said "anything."

You were the one that found it odd that a State reprenstative would be involved in measures to increase state revenue. i was simply trying to get you pointed in the right direction.


RE: Blaze pink - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 05-25-2016

(05-25-2016, 04:49 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Review all you want; as my point has remained unchanged: Anything that can produce revenue to a state should be the business of a State rerensentative and should be considered. I know you wish I had said they should do or approve anything to increase revenue; unfortunately, I did not. Did you really think someone didn't see your feeble attempt at "gotcha" when you said "anything."

I asked you to qualify an absolute. Maybe next time you should qualify it or don't speak in absolutes.

Quote:You were the one that found it odd that a State reprenstative would be involved in measures to increase state revenue. i was simply trying to get you pointed in the right direction.

I noted you brought up a good point which I overlooked which helped me understand his motive. Thank you.


RE: Blaze pink - bfine32 - 05-25-2016

(05-25-2016, 05:13 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: I asked you to qualify an absolute. Maybe next time you should qualify it or don't speak in absolutes.


I noted you brought up a good point which I overlooked which helped me understand his motive. Thank you.

Well I guess you lost me on what we were supposed to review then.


RE: Blaze pink - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 05-25-2016

(05-25-2016, 05:16 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Well I guess you lost me on what we were supposed to review then.

Okay, I guess I just don't understand.

(05-25-2016, 04:49 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Review all you want; as my point has remained unchanged: Anything that can produce revenue to a state should be the business of a State rerensentative and should be considered. I know you wish I had said they should do or approve anything to increase revenue; unfortunately, I did not. Did you really think someone didn't see your feeble attempt at "gotcha" when you said "anything."

You were the one that found it odd that a State reprenstative would be involved in measures to increase state revenue. i was simply trying to get you pointed in the right direction.

How is your use of "anything" in the first sentence different than your use of "anything" in the second sentence?  This isn't an attempt at a "gotcha," I just don't understand the distinction you are making.