+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Off Topic Forums (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Off-Topic-Forums)
+--- Forum: Politics & Religion 2.0 (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Politics-Religion-2-0)
+---- Forum: P & R Archive (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-P-R-Archive)
+---- Thread: More winning (/Thread-More-winning)
RE: More winning - Nately120 - 06-27-2018
(06-27-2018, 12:20 PM)GMDino Wrote: It's the Reagan "welfare queen" story over and over again....
Personally, I think the idea of someone making $15 an hour at McDonalds is a little wacky, but I do find the political spin-machine that insists poor people refuse to work is the same one that does everything it can to make it possible to work and still be poor. Oy.
RE: More winning - GMDino - 06-27-2018
(06-27-2018, 12:23 PM)Nately120 Wrote: Personally, I think the idea of someone making $15 an hour at McDonalds is a little wacky, but I do find the political spin-machine that insists poor people refuse to work is the same one that does everything it can to make it possible to work and still be poor. Oy.
Especially given the ever widening pay gap.
RE: More winning - BmorePat87 - 06-27-2018
(06-27-2018, 12:12 AM)fredtoast Wrote: I have no problem with this decision as long as abortion providers are not required to inform women of the options of adoption and women at abortion clinics are not forced to have an ultrasound or hear the babies heart.
Personally I think the best thing would be for both sides to be required to advise women of all options, and Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers counsel women on all options. But it the anti-choice side are afraid to educate a woman that is there right.
The perfect response to this issue. Anyone who champions this decision but also calls on abortion providers to be required to provide information against abortions doesn't actually care about the 1st Amendment.
RE: More winning - Nately120 - 06-27-2018
(06-27-2018, 12:35 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: The perfect response to this issue. Anyone who champions this decision but also calls on abortion providers to be required to provide information against abortions doesn't actually care about the 1st Amendment.
For all people scream about the USA being awesome and free and free because it is awesome, a lot of people actively attempt to limit the amount of freedom we have.
RE: More winning - Millhouse - 06-27-2018
It's a good ruling by SCROTUS. California has become the looney toon state of the left, and this helps keep their political leaders in check.
RE: More winning - Bengalzona - 06-27-2018
As long as it is a two-way street, I have no problem with the decision.
But I sense that it won't be.
RE: More winning - Belsnickel - 06-27-2018
(06-27-2018, 02:56 PM)Bengalzona Wrote: As long as it is a two-way street, I have no problem with the decision.
But I sense that it won't be.
Are you saying that people will be selective in their application of the Constitution!? I cannot believe it!
RE: More winning - michaelsean - 06-27-2018
(06-27-2018, 12:23 PM)Nately120 Wrote: Personally, I think the idea of someone making $15 an hour at McDonalds is a little wacky, but I do find the political spin-machine that insists poor people refuse to work is the same one that does everything it can to make it possible to work and still be poor. Oy.
Unless you work the drive thru. that's worth $50 an hour.
RE: More winning - Bengalzona - 06-27-2018
(06-27-2018, 03:05 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: Are you saying that people will be selective in their application of the Constitution!? I cannot believe it!
Well, probably no more than are selective in their reading of the Bible.
