+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Off Topic Forums (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Off-Topic-Forums)
+--- Forum: Politics & Religion 2.0 (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Politics-Religion-2-0)
+---- Forum: P & R Archive (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-P-R-Archive)
+---- Thread: Post Your ISideWith results (/Thread-Post-Your-ISideWith-results)
RE: Post Your ISideWith results - michaelsean - 08-11-2016
(08-11-2016, 12:17 PM)PhilHos Wrote: Great. I start looking at the Constitution Party and Castle and, what do you know? They're not available on the ballot in CT.
I swear, CT sucks and, seriously, it's because this frickin' state is run by liberal Democrats.
I voted for the Constitution Party in 2008. I liked the name, but for all I knew at the time, they could have been left of the Socialists if that's actually possble on the political spectrum. Yeah I think Matt said that on the worldwide spectrum, socialists are center right.
Calm down, I know I said "seriously" but it's more of an emotional rant than anything else. Sheesh.
RE: Post Your ISideWith results - Belsnickel - 08-11-2016
(08-11-2016, 02:28 PM)michaelsean Wrote: I voted for the Constitution Party in 2008. I liked the name, but for all I knew at the time, they could have been left of the Socialists if that's actually possble on the political spectrum. Yeah I think Matt said that on the worldwide spectrum, socialists are center right. Hilarious
Well, socialism isn't a political ideology, so there is that.
RE: Post Your ISideWith results - Nately120 - 08-11-2016
As I expected...er...mostly.
![[Image: Isidewith.jpg]](https://s10.postimg.org/rpru6r0hl/Isidewith.jpg)
RE: Post Your ISideWith results - michaelsean - 08-11-2016
Wow I really messed up that quote
RE: Post Your ISideWith results - CageTheBengal - 08-11-2016
Just to clarify I would never vote for Jill Stein I think she's qualified to fight the machine and be a protest candidate more than anything else. That basically sums up the Green party in general imo.
RE: Post Your ISideWith results - Goalpost - 08-11-2016
Trump 92
Johnson 80
Castle 67
Clinton 46
Stein 46
RE: Post Your ISideWith results - fredtoast - 08-12-2016
Stein.......94
Clinton....93
Johnson..34
Trump.....05
RE: Post Your ISideWith results - fredtoast - 08-12-2016
I hope you all realized that there are a lotr more options if you click on "other position".
RE: Post Your ISideWith results - michaelsean - 08-12-2016
(08-12-2016, 11:06 AM)fredtoast Wrote: I hope you all realized that there are a lotr more options if you click on "other position".
Figured that out about 1/3 of the way through, but didn't go back and change any previous answers.
RE: Post Your ISideWith results - PhilHos - 08-12-2016
(08-12-2016, 11:06 AM)fredtoast Wrote: I hope you all realized that there are a lotr more options if you click on "other position".
Yeah. I answered a LOT of questions, but I got tired of clicking "click for more social questions" or whatever.
RE: Post Your ISideWith results - michaelsean - 08-12-2016
(08-12-2016, 11:28 AM)PhilHos Wrote: Yeah. I answered a LOT of questions, but I got tired of clicking "click for more social questions" or whatever.
He's talking about the options if you click "other". You could be more specific. For example for death penalty I chose "Yes, but only for minorities."
RE: Post Your ISideWith results - PhilHos - 08-12-2016
(08-12-2016, 11:35 AM)michaelsean Wrote: He's talking about the options if you click "other". You could be more specific. For example for death penalty I chose "Yes, but only for minorities."
Oh, well, yeah, I did that too. Although not all of the "other" options were more appealing than a straight, "yes or no".
RE: Post Your ISideWith results - bfine32 - 08-12-2016
There was one question in this survey as well as the issues Thread Matt started that I cannot understand the logic behind anybody saying No:
Should a picture ID be required to vote?
RE: Post Your ISideWith results - PhilHos - 08-12-2016
(08-12-2016, 11:42 AM)bfine32 Wrote: There was one question in this survey as well as the issues Thread Matt started that I cannot understand the logic behind anybody saying yes:
Should a picture ID be required to vote?
What's not to understand?
RE: Post Your ISideWith results - Johnny Cupcakes - 08-12-2016
Jill Stein - 88%
Hillary Clinton - 85%
Gary Johnson - 79%
Darrell Castle - 34%
Donald Trump - 20%
RE: Post Your ISideWith results - Johnny Cupcakes - 08-12-2016
(08-12-2016, 11:42 AM)bfine32 Wrote: There was one question in this survey as well as the issues Thread Matt started that I cannot understand the logic behind anybody saying yes:
Should a picture ID be required to vote?
You don't think a photo ID should be required to vote?
RE: Post Your ISideWith results - bfine32 - 08-12-2016
(08-12-2016, 12:05 PM)Johnny Cupcakes Wrote: You don't think a photo ID should be required to vote?
Dang, I guess I worded that wrong. I'm meant to say no. I'll corect.
RE: Post Your ISideWith results - fredtoast - 08-12-2016
Voter fraud occurs at the registration level, not at the voting booth. Photo ID requirement does nothing to deal with voter fraud. All it does is throw up another hurdle for the poor to vote.
RE: Post Your ISideWith results - bfine32 - 08-12-2016
(08-12-2016, 12:28 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Voter fraud occurs at the registration level, not at the voting booth. Photo ID requirement does nothing to deal with voter fraud. All it does is throw up another hurdle for the poor to vote.
So you don't think a Photo ID should be required to vote?
RE: Post Your ISideWith results - fredtoast - 08-12-2016
(08-12-2016, 12:32 PM)bfine32 Wrote: So you don't think a Photo ID should be required to vote?
My position is clear to everyone but you.
Let's not hijack this thread.