![]() |
James Comey Press Con. At 11am - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Off Topic Forums (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Off-Topic-Forums) +--- Forum: Politics & Religion 2.0 (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Politics-Religion-2-0) +---- Forum: P & R Archive (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-P-R-Archive) +---- Thread: James Comey Press Con. At 11am (/Thread-James-Comey-Press-Con-At-11am) |
RE: James Comey Press Con. At 11am - michaelsean - 07-07-2016 So the non-partisan Elijah ![]() RE: James Comey Press Con. At 11am - GMDino - 07-07-2016 (07-07-2016, 11:11 PM)michaelsean Wrote: So the non-partisan Elijah I read more as an indictment of the GOP having hearings because they didn't like the outcome of an investigation led by a man the were endorsing before the outcome. The Petraeus comment concerns a lack of follow up into the affair because it was important to them politically. RE: James Comey Press Con. At 11am - bfine32 - 08-22-2016 Colin Powell says she didn't get the practice from me: http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/22/politics/colin-powell-rejects-clinton-email-defense/index.html Quote:Colin Powell is pushing back on reports suggesting that he might have given Hillary Clinton the idea to use a private email account as Secretary of State, telling media outlets that "her people are trying to pin it on me."..... RE: James Comey Press Con. At 11am - bfine32 - 09-02-2016 https://www.yahoo.com/news/fbi-publishes-notes-clintons-private-email-173020083--election.html?ref=gs Quote:Then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton relied on the judgments of her staff and others not to illegally send emails containing classified information to her private email server, and told FBI investigators she was unclear about a classification marking on official government documents. This one is too funny... Quote:In her interview, Clinton said she was unfamiliar the meaning of the letter "c'' next to a paragraph and speculated that it might be "referencing paragraphs marked in alphabetical order." That particular email had been marked as "confidential," the lowest level of classification. Clinton said she did not pay attention to the classified level "and took all classified information seriously," according to the FBI notes. Thought the "c" meant alphabetical paragraphs? I wonder what she thought happened to a and b.... RE: James Comey Press Con. At 11am - michaelsean - 09-02-2016 (09-02-2016, 04:15 PM)bfine32 Wrote: https://www.yahoo.com/news/fbi-publishes-notes-clintons-private-email-173020083--election.html?ref=gs Well this is coming from the genius who didn't want to have to carry separate devices in order to use multiple email accounts. not to mention, things don't actually have to be marked classified. She's the Secretary of State. There are things that she receives that are classified by their nature. RE: James Comey Press Con. At 11am - masterpanthera_t - 09-02-2016 (09-02-2016, 04:23 PM)michaelsean Wrote: Well this is coming from the genius who didn't want to have to carry separate devices in order to use multiple email accounts. I'm not surprised since this is the spouse of the guy who supposedly exclaimed in court "that depends on what the definition of is is". I can only shake my head at the sad state of political affairs in the nation that we have two of the worst candidates ever running for office under major party banners. RE: James Comey Press Con. At 11am - bfine32 - 09-02-2016 (09-02-2016, 04:23 PM)michaelsean Wrote: Well this is coming from the genius who didn't want to have to carry separate devices in order to use multiple email accounts. When the whole email thing started I said her best case scenario was incompetence. Many balked at that. As ir starts to come out in the wash, she is clinging tighter and tighter to that excuse. RE: James Comey Press Con. At 11am - GMDino - 09-03-2016 (09-02-2016, 08:10 PM)bfine32 Wrote: When the whole email thing started I said her best case scenario was incompetence. Many balked at that. As ir starts to come out in the wash, she is clinging tighter and tighter to that excuse. Best case scenario is she didn't do anything illegal. Which many balked at. As the truth comes out many are still clinging to he doing something illegal. RE: James Comey Press Con. At 11am - JustWinBaby - 09-03-2016 Oh, what a relief! She's not incompetent or crooked, she's just forgetful! She just old! THAT is what I want in a POTUS - old and forgetful, but definitely NOT crooked. RE: James Comey Press Con. At 11am - GMDino - 09-03-2016 (09-03-2016, 12:21 PM)JustWinBaby Wrote: Oh, what a relief! She's not incompetent or crooked, she's just forgetful! She just old! I guess there's no one for you to vote for then. ![]() http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/284716-trump-doesnt-recall-claim-of-having-worlds-greatest-memory Quote:Trump can't recall saying he has one of the world's best memories Cause we know Trump is definitely not a crook. ![]() RE: James Comey Press Con. At 11am - GMDino - 09-04-2016 (09-02-2016, 04:15 PM)bfine32 Wrote: https://www.yahoo.com/news/fbi-publishes-notes-clintons-private-email-173020083--election.html?ref=gs http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/09/03/records-week-review-clintons-fbi-interview/89782284/ Quote:Other finds: Clinton's email server had not been hacked, according to the FBI, but they couldn't say the same for the 13 Blackberry devices she used while she was at State. Those weren't available. Also, Clinton used three different iPads during that time — the two of those that were analyzed also weren't hacked. The other one wasn't available. Nothing they had to go over was hacked...so the Trump people insist the rest must be. That's the same grasp of math that his followers are using to justify the wall on the Mexican border. ![]() RE: James Comey Press Con. At 11am - McC - 09-04-2016 (09-03-2016, 12:33 PM)GMDino Wrote: I guess there's no one for you to vote for then. Funny how your only defense of anything negative about Hillmonster is----Trump is worse. What a ringing endorsement that is. RE: James Comey Press Con. At 11am - McC - 09-04-2016 (09-03-2016, 12:33 PM)GMDino Wrote: I guess there's no one for you to vote for then. You should be shedding tears. We all should be. Instead, your response is glee that your horrible candidate will win, when the truth is the whole country loses. RE: James Comey Press Con. At 11am - GMDino - 09-04-2016 (09-04-2016, 10:46 AM)McC Wrote: Funny how your only defense of anything negative about Hillmonster is----Trump is worse. What a ringing endorsement that is. Oh, I did say he was worse? Or did I say he also has the same problem? RE: James Comey Press Con. At 11am - GMDino - 09-04-2016 (09-04-2016, 10:50 AM)McC Wrote: You should be shedding tears. We all should be. Instead, your response is glee that your horrible candidate will win, when the truth is the whole country loses. No one is happy with those two. No one. Yet some folks like to jump up and defend the actions of a madman. That is very telling. RE: James Comey Press Con. At 11am - JustWinBaby - 09-04-2016 (09-03-2016, 12:33 PM)GMDino Wrote: I guess there's no one for you to vote for then.Yeah, Gary Johnson. But it is funny how you continue to defend Hillary like every attack on her is an attempt at supporting Trump. Just because that's what you're doing with every Trump attack thread doesn't mean anyone else here is actually going to vote for Trump. Also, lighten up and get a sense of humor. You're like a little kid with the "I know you are but what am I" routine every time someone makes a joke about Hillary. RE: James Comey Press Con. At 11am - JustWinBaby - 09-04-2016 (09-04-2016, 10:55 AM)GMDino Wrote: Yet some folks like to jump up and defend the actions of a madman. That is very telling. No one here, except maybe Lucie, has been "defending the actions of a madman". You LOVE yourself some Hillary, that's why you aggressively defend every slight, real and imagined. Stop trying to justify your stumping for Hillary by pretending any here are promoting Trump. No one is. That's all in your head. This act of yours has gone from cute and mildly irritating to just plain pathetic. Woe Hillary, poor poor Hillary, the mean Trump supporters are so unfair to her. wah RE: James Comey Press Con. At 11am - bfine32 - 09-04-2016 (09-04-2016, 11:40 AM)JustWinBaby Wrote: Yeah, Gary Johnson. But it is funny how you continue to defend Hillary like every attack on her is an attempt at supporting Trump. The logic is insane and just one look at the main page shows 5 anti-Trump threads started by the same person. If someone points out the piling on of Trump, they automatically become a Trump supporter; however, if someone constantly defends Hills in the few threads that concern her; it's just being unbiased. It is much more productive when we are honest. RE: James Comey Press Con. At 11am - GMDino - 09-04-2016 (09-04-2016, 11:45 AM)JustWinBaby Wrote: No one here, except maybe Lucie, has been "defending the actions of a madman". You LOVE yourself some Hillary, that's why you aggressively defend every slight, real and imagined. Nope. I have made it abundantly clear that I don't care for Clinton but hate Trump and will continue to pile on him until at LEAST the election in November. Everything else is merely projection and personal attacks. Please get back on topic. ![]() RE: James Comey Press Con. At 11am - GMDino - 09-04-2016 (09-04-2016, 11:48 AM)bfine32 Wrote: The logic is insane and just one look at the main page shows 5 anti-Trump threads started by the same person. If someone points out the piling on of Trump, they automatically become a Trump supporter; however, if someone constantly defends Hills in the few threads that concern her; it's just being unbiased. Again I have not hidden from the fact that I hate Trump. I have stated repeatedly that I will post about him a lot. I have even suggested there be a mega-Trump thread! All for it! However people making personal attacks on posters, complaining about the mods allowing certain things that they personally do not like, and continuing to defend Trump all while saying they "don't support" him are what derails threads. All while "not responding" to certain people except in a passive aggressive way because actual dialogue bothers them when their beliefs are challenged or questioned. It is almost as if some people want to deliberately try to get threads they disagree with locked by going completely off the rails. I would not encourage that behavior. Let's try to stay on topic and discuss the issue of who lies and if Clinton was actually guilty even though investigation after investigation said she was not. Thanks everyone. |