Trump's First 100 Days - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Off Topic Forums (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Off-Topic-Forums) +--- Forum: Politics & Religion 2.0 (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Politics-Religion-2-0) +---- Forum: P & R Archive (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-P-R-Archive) +---- Thread: Trump's First 100 Days (/Thread-Trump-s-First-100-Days) |
RE: Trump's First 100 Days - Rotobeast - 02-13-2017 (02-13-2017, 12:56 PM)Griever Wrote: now they just need to do like republicans and start of list of things they will boycottIsn't that a little sexist ? I mean, nobody ever threatens with a GIRLcott. RE: Trump's First 100 Days - GMDino - 02-13-2017 http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/02/13/flynn-apologizes-after-admitting-he-may-have-discussed-sanctions-russia/97852248/ Quote:National Security Adviser Michael Flynn has apologized amid reports that Flynn discussed U.S. sanctions against Russia with the Russian ambassador in the days before President Trump's inauguration, a White House official said. RE: Trump's First 100 Days - BmorePat87 - 02-14-2017 (02-13-2017, 06:22 PM)GMDino Wrote: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/02/13/flynn-apologizes-after-admitting-he-may-have-discussed-sanctions-russia/97852248/ http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/02/14/michael-flynns-letter-resignation-as-national-security-adviser.html RE: Trump's First 100 Days - Vas Deferens - 02-14-2017 FAKE NEWS! SAD! RE: Trump's First 100 Days - BmorePat87 - 02-14-2017 RE: Trump's First 100 Days - Vas Deferens - 02-14-2017 Is it really that surprising the first botched job by this clown would be his pick in an INTELLIGENCE capacity. But I've been told Repubes are better at businessiessy stuff. RE: Trump's First 100 Days - GMDino - 02-14-2017 (02-14-2017, 02:00 AM)BmorePat87 Wrote: I was at my parents last night and said he'd be gone by the end of the week. surprised it was this fast. Clearly the best vetted people are getting jobs with the Trump Administration . RE: Trump's First 100 Days - BmorePat87 - 02-15-2017 and Andy Puzder has withdrawn his nomination for Labor Sec after Republicans discovered they lacked the votes within their party to nominate him after news of his hiring of an illegal immigrant and the recent resurfacing of a 1990 episode of Oprah in which his ex wife accused him of domestic abuse (something she later recanted this as part of a custody agreement). RE: Trump's First 100 Days - bfine32 - 02-15-2017 (02-15-2017, 05:26 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: and Andy Puzder has withdrawn his nomination for Labor Sec after Republicans discovered they lacked the votes within their party to nominate him after news of his hiring of an illegal immigrant and the recent resurfacing of a 1990 episode of Oprah in which his ex wife accused him of domestic abuse (something she later recanted this as part of a custody agreement). Kudos to the GOP for this bi-partisan move. RE: Trump's First 100 Days - NATI BENGALS - 02-15-2017 (02-15-2017, 08:06 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Kudos to the GOP for this bi-partisan move. I have been really impressed by the GOPs performance thus far as the majority running the show. Ensuring some mentally disabled could buy firearms was at the top of EVERYBODY'S list of importance. And making sure oil companies didnt have to disclose financial information was a top priority for the majority of Americans. Only the big time important issues first. Special interests be damned. These GOP law makers have proved this will be an incredibly productive term for the American people. RE: Trump's First 100 Days - GMDino - 02-15-2017 http://www.orlandoweekly.com/Blogs/archives/2017/02/13/donald-trump-will-visit-mar-a-lago-again-this-friday-for-the-third-weekend-in-a-row# Quote:Donald Trump, a man who claimed while campaigning that he would not be a president who took vacations, will return to the fabulous Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida for his third consecutive vacation this Friday. RE: Trump's First 100 Days - bfine32 - 02-15-2017 (02-15-2017, 10:14 PM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: Ensuring some mentally disabled could buy firearms was at the top of EVERYBODY'S list of importance. You don't think the mentally disabled are entitled to their Constitutional rights? RE: Trump's First 100 Days - GMDino - 02-15-2017 Let me add that I am in the court with people who agree the POTUS is never *really* on vacation. But then i don't know any who ran on saying they would almost never leave Washington because they had too much work to do and then left every weekend for the first month they were in office either. RE: Trump's First 100 Days - NATI BENGALS - 02-15-2017 (02-15-2017, 10:47 PM)bfine32 Wrote: You don't think the mentally disabled are entitled to their Constitutional rights? You think ensuring mentally ill people are armed is a top priority? RE: Trump's First 100 Days - bfine32 - 02-15-2017 (02-15-2017, 10:57 PM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: You think ensuring mentally ill people are armed is a top priority? Nope (See that's called answering a question). Who made ensuring mentally ill people were armed a top priority? RE: Trump's First 100 Days - NATI BENGALS - 02-16-2017 (02-15-2017, 11:15 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Nope (See that's called answering a question). Who made ensuring mentally ill people were armed a top priority? The ones who in the first few weeks brought up and voted to make sure those incapable of handling their finances could still buy a gun. Other than appeasing the NRA the 75,000 people who could be affected probably dont know what happened. And to answer your question I think the mentally disabled should have a harder time buying a gun. So felons cant vote? But if you plead insanity you can still buy a gun? IDK. Complicated issue. Lot of different catagories. Mental health isnt a current strong suit of our country. Seeing the GOP prioritize rolling back regulations so people unable to cash a check can buy a guns just doesnt sit well. RE: Trump's First 100 Days - Rotobeast - 02-16-2017 (02-16-2017, 01:37 AM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: The ones who in the first few weeks brought up and voted to make sure those incapable of handling their finances could still buy a gun. Other than appeasing the NRA the 75,000 people who could be affected probably dont know what happened.Just curious.... Do you think all Vets with PTSD should be denied firearms ? Do you feel that anyone that has ever taken anti-depressants should be denied. Both have happened to people I know and I'd trust them with my life. Furthermore, such restrictions have prevented people from admitting they have an issue and seeking help. Mind you, I don't think people that have been committed and have continued treatment need the right to rush right out and become armed. We just need highly defined language in such a bill/law. Honestly though, anybody can get damn near anything. It just takes money. P.S. the NRA sucks ! RE: Trump's First 100 Days - NATI BENGALS - 02-16-2017 (02-16-2017, 02:40 AM)Rotobeast Wrote: Just curious.... No and no. My half assed attempt at understanding the law led me to believe people receiving social security checks who were mentally incapable of handling their finances without a 3rd party were subject to this rule. If someone felt the rule unfairly hurt them they could object on a case by case basis. I have no idea how any of this is kept track of. I had a friend who went off the rails. Couple stays in a mental hospital. He is stable to say the least. He should have some extra hoops to jump through at a minimum if he wanted to buy a gun. There are people i grew up with that were always in special ed classes. And they will always be dependent on a government check and they will never be able to make their own financial decisions so someone else will do it for them. They shouldnt be able to buy guns. RE: Trump's First 100 Days - Rotobeast - 02-16-2017 (02-16-2017, 04:03 AM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: No and no.Ok, cool. Thanks for clarifying. I thought we'd pretty much be on the same page. RE: Trump's First 100 Days - bfine32 - 02-16-2017 (02-16-2017, 01:37 AM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: The ones who in the first few weeks brought up and voted to make sure those incapable of handling their finances could still buy a gun. Other than appeasing the NRA the 75,000 people who could be affected probably dont know what happened. Sounds like you're just looking for something to be mad about; however, that's just me. I'm sure many here feel you bring up a legitimate concern As to the Can felons vote: I think it depends on their state. |