![]() |
‘Military-Style’ Firearms Aren’t Protected By Second Amendment, Court Rules - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Off Topic Forums (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Off-Topic-Forums) +--- Forum: Politics & Religion 2.0 (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Politics-Religion-2-0) +---- Forum: P & R Archive (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-P-R-Archive) +---- Thread: ‘Military-Style’ Firearms Aren’t Protected By Second Amendment, Court Rules (/Thread-%E2%80%98Military-Style%E2%80%99-Firearms-Aren%E2%80%99t-Protected-By-Second-Amendment-Court-Rules) |
RE: ‘Military-Style’ Firearms Aren’t Protected By Second Amendment, Court Rules - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 02-27-2017 (02-27-2017, 04:02 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: I never said automobiles can't save a life. I just said both can kill people, both can save lives, but one is treated far differently than the other. (02-25-2017, 11:45 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: I haven't seen a single person mention this yet... aside from home defense/self defense, I also just simply enjoy shooting for hobby/leisure. I guess I misunderstood. RE: ‘Military-Style’ Firearms Aren’t Protected By Second Amendment, Court Rules - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 02-27-2017 (02-27-2017, 04:11 PM)Rotobeast Wrote: Thanks, Shirley ! You're welcome. And don't call me Shirley. |