![]() |
Trump bans transgender people from serving in U.S. military 'in any capacity' - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Off Topic Forums (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Off-Topic-Forums) +--- Forum: Politics & Religion 2.0 (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Politics-Religion-2-0) +---- Forum: P & R Archive (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-P-R-Archive) +---- Thread: Trump bans transgender people from serving in U.S. military 'in any capacity' (/Thread-Trump-bans-transgender-people-from-serving-in-U-S-military-in-any-capacity) |
RE: Trump bans transgender people from serving in U.S. military 'in any capacity' - StLucieBengal - 08-12-2017 (08-12-2017, 07:03 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: No, it's 40% who have attempted, 92% of that having been prior to the age of 25. If you want to get technical, 4% of suicides are successful, so 1.6 in every 100. Higher than average (about 5 times higher than straight youth), but not anywhere near these numbers you're confused about. You just made the case for why we do not need to add transgenders in the military. 40% attempted suicide is still a crazy number. Even if only 4% successful ..... why do we want 96% of that 40% in the military..... too expensive to train people who have suicide on the brain. RE: Trump bans transgender people from serving in U.S. military 'in any capacity' - Griever - 08-12-2017 (08-12-2017, 07:15 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: You just made the case for why we do not need to add transgenders in the military. 40% attempted suicide is still a crazy number. Even if only 4% successful ..... why do we want 96% of that 40% in the military..... too expensive to train people who have suicide on the brain. nah, whats too expensive is the pentagon spending 40+ million dollars on viagra and cialis for old farts that can't get erections anymore, just because they were in the military transgender services are a small amount of money (6-8 million i believe it was) but the funniest thing is we have a guy who has 4 draft deferments trying to tell people who is/isnt worthy to serve in the military and put their life on the line if they choose to RE: Trump bans transgender people from serving in U.S. military 'in any capacity' - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 08-12-2017 (08-12-2017, 05:03 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: So we should allow people who suffer from high suicide rates into the military? Shouldn't we be concerned if they are one of the 4 out of 10 who will kill themselves? Soldiers already have enough stress.... if 4 out of 10 are coming in likely to commit suicide then how much will that grow once under the stress of being a soldier? And it's expensive to train a soldier..... why are we investing in people with such a high suicide rate coming through the door? Again, experts in the military and medicine and military medicine whose knowledge and experience far exceed your's and Trump's combine have determined transgender individuals qualify medically for the military. RE: Trump bans transgender people from serving in U.S. military 'in any capacity' - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 08-12-2017 (08-12-2017, 07:20 PM)Griever Wrote: nah, whats too expensive is the pentagon spending 40+ million dollars on viagra and cialis for old farts that can't get erections anymore, just because they were in the military And another guy completely unaffiliated with the military in any capacity asking should "we" allow people in the military. LMFAO. "We." RE: Trump bans transgender people from serving in U.S. military 'in any capacity' - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 08-12-2017 (08-12-2017, 07:15 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: You just made the case for why we do not need to add transgenders in the military. 40% attempted suicide is still a crazy number. Even if only 4% successful ..... why do we want 96% of that 40% in the military..... too expensive to train people who have suicide on the brain. I'm gonna need confirmation of the numbers you keep spitting out because your sources are dubious at best. RE: Trump bans transgender people from serving in U.S. military 'in any capacity' - Griever - 08-12-2017 (08-12-2017, 07:47 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: And another guy completely unaffiliated with the military in any capacity asking should "we" allow people in the military. LMFAO. "We." im only affiliated by family my brother knew he had gay guys in his unit, and muslims, but when the bullets went off, they were putting their life on the line just like he did, and he was one of the lucky ones to come out of 3 seperate attacks mostly unscathed RE: Trump bans transgender people from serving in U.S. military 'in any capacity' - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 08-12-2017 (08-12-2017, 07:53 PM)Griever Wrote: im only affiliated by family It's always the faux Libertarians wanting to take away other's liberties based upon their feelings. Sad. RE: Trump bans transgender people from serving in U.S. military 'in any capacity' - StLucieBengal - 08-12-2017 (08-12-2017, 07:50 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: I'm gonna need confirmation of the numbers you keep spitting out because your sources are dubious at best. Google away. It's not my responsibility to hold your hand. RE: Trump bans transgender people from serving in U.S. military 'in any capacity' - BmorePat87 - 08-12-2017 (08-12-2017, 07:15 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: You just made the case for why we do not need to add transgenders in the military. 40% attempted suicide is still a crazy number. Even if only 4% successful ..... why do we want 96% of that 40% in the military..... too expensive to train people who have suicide on the brain. Like I said, those are mostly youth numbers, but it's still a very small percent. Apparently the generals don't have an issue with it. Are you suggesting they ban anyone who has prior thought of suicide? This line of logic suggests it's too risky to allow white men in the military because they account for 70% of suicides. RE: Trump bans transgender people from serving in U.S. military 'in any capacity' - GMDino - 08-12-2017 (08-12-2017, 09:46 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Google away. It's not my responsibility to hold your hand. My pleasure. Took about 30 seconds. tl;dr When society/the community/family are accepting of transgendered people the subsidized rate within that subgroup plummets. When they reject/abuse/try to change them it skyrockets. My summary, based on those results, is that accepting into a group like the army would lower the suicide rate. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brynn-tannehill/the-truth-about-transgend_b_8564834.html Quote:People know that transgender people are at a higher risk of suicide, but why this risk is higher is often not understood by the public, or misused by people who wish us further harm. The statistic that 40% of transgender people have attempted suicide is used all the time to justify all sorts of things that have absolutely zero basis in science. RE: Trump bans transgender people from serving in U.S. military 'in any capacity' - StLucieBengal - 08-12-2017 (08-12-2017, 10:15 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: Like I said, those are mostly youth numbers, but it's still a very small percent. Apparently the generals don't have an issue with it. Are you suggesting they ban anyone who has prior thought of suicide? This line of logic suggests it's too risky to allow white men in the military because they account for 70% of suicides. Yes they do not let people in with those types of issues. Medical disqualification would cover this end. It's too bad bfine isn't around, it sure would be nice for him to chime in with the specifics. RE: Trump bans transgender people from serving in U.S. military 'in any capacity' - StLucieBengal - 08-12-2017 http://time.com/4595422/transgender-survey-data-united-states/ Quote:And 40% said they had attempted to commit suicide at some point in their lifetime, compared to 4.6% of the general population. Since we have an inability to google from the front page. RE: Trump bans transgender people from serving in U.S. military 'in any capacity' - GMDino - 08-12-2017 (08-12-2017, 10:32 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Yes they do not let people in with those types of issues. Medical disqualification would cover this end. Others here directly involved with the military have given "specifics". They are being ignored in favor of bias and personal opinion. RE: Trump bans transgender people from serving in U.S. military 'in any capacity' - BmorePat87 - 08-12-2017 (08-12-2017, 10:32 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Yes they do not let people in with those types of issues. Medical disqualification would cover this end. So the screening occurs before they make their "investment"? No worries then. They can turn their focus to the real issue: the fact that 20 veterans kill themselves a day, accounting for 1/5th of all suicides. RE: Trump bans transgender people from serving in U.S. military 'in any capacity' - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 08-13-2017 (08-12-2017, 10:32 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Yes they do not let people in with those types of issues. Medical disqualification would cover this end. Was it so difficult to provide one link? LOL Too bad bfine isn't here, but luckily as a former military medical provider I am your resident subject matter expert. 1) IAW AR 40-501, transgender individuals qualify medically for military service so "we" don't need to fret about whether we should let them in the military. The matter is already settled. 2) IAW AR 40-501, people with a history of suicide ideation do not qualify for induction into the military whether they are heterosexual, homosexual, transgender. 3) Military veterans have a 50% greater chance of committing suicide compared to the civilian population. Which means they are 10% more likely to commit suicide than transgender individuals. I guess we can't let service members join the service, either. At least not if we pay attention to your faulty logic. RE: Trump bans transgender people from serving in U.S. military 'in any capacity' - StLucieBengal - 08-13-2017 (08-12-2017, 11:12 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: So the screening occurs before they make their "investment"? No worries then. Exactly being a vet is stressful enough we do not need add a fragile group to that amount of stress. Keep making my point. RE: Trump bans transgender people from serving in U.S. military 'in any capacity' - StLucieBengal - 08-13-2017 (08-13-2017, 12:20 AM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Was it so difficult to provide one link? LOL If any population came to the military with a 40% suicide rate they would be rejected. The only reason it's being even talked about is the social engineering obama wanted to mess with the military. RE: Trump bans transgender people from serving in U.S. military 'in any capacity' - GMDino - 08-13-2017 (08-13-2017, 12:36 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Exactly being a vet is stressful enough we do not need add a fragile group to that amount of stress. I believe the point was that those transgender already in the military passed the tests and were not suicidal thus the suicide rate among them in general is a moot point. But one that keeps being made despite every fact against it. ![]() RE: Trump bans transgender people from serving in U.S. military 'in any capacity' - StLucieBengal - 08-13-2017 (08-13-2017, 12:38 AM)GMDino Wrote: I believe the point was that those transgender already in the military passed the tests and were not suicidal thus the suicide rate among them in general is a moot point. I don't have a problem grandfathering the currents ones in already. I think they should be moved to back line type jobs that would be less stressful and less likely to trigger their suicidal tendencies. As far as new recruits ..... they should be a quick no. RE: Trump bans transgender people from serving in U.S. military 'in any capacity' - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 08-13-2017 (08-13-2017, 12:38 AM)StLucieBengal Wrote: If any population came to the military with a 40% suicide rate they would be rejected. The only reason it's being even talked about is the social engineering obama wanted to mess with the military. What population are you talking about? Americans? Remember "let's try freedom"? How quickly you abandon freedom when it interferes with your ability to segregate and discriminate against fellow Americans based upon gender. It's anti-American really. No wonder you and and Trump idolize Putin. You wanted specifics. I gave you specifics. Obama didn't write AR 40-501 or DSM 5. So your social engineering crap is circling the drain. As usual. Once again, the group of Americans joining the military commit suicide at double the rate as the group of Ameicans not joining. So obviously "we" can't let them in the military with their high rate of suicide. Christ, would you risk your life knowing the person next to you was twice as likely to commit suicide as a civilian? Obviously not. What was your excuse again? I believe you said you were "too busy" doing "other things." Too busy to serve, but not too busy telling other people they can't do what you refused to do yourself. |