(03-21-2017, 05:41 PM)bfine32 Wrote: You didn't hear Madonna saying she wanted to blow up the White House.

(03-22-2017, 12:04 AM)GMDino Wrote: Thanks for not denying he lies at least.

I know it kills you yo admit it while you are "not supporting him".  

(03-22-2017, 01:11 AM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: I just think it's funny that you apparently feel the need to put it in quotes just because I occasionally call you out on your BS.

Both sides are awful. Neither one has the common folks best interest in heart. Both side just want more power. I have criticized Trump plenty. He's a lying politician (redundant) who talks like an idiot. I have never hesitated to say otherwise. That doesn't mean I have to go "DERP DE DERP! TRUMP IS HITLER! HERE'S A CLICKBAIT ARTICLE TO PROVE IT! WE'RE ALL GOING TO DIE!"

I can dislike him, hope he does well for this country (it's my country afterall, and I live in it), and also make fun of your hysterics.

(03-22-2017, 03:49 PM)xxlt Wrote: Takeaway: It’s becoming less and less likely Republicans in Congress will want to wait until the 2018 midterms – and a finding by U.S. intelligence agencies that Trump or his associates collaborated with Russian operatives in throwing the 2016 – before moving to dump Trump. By that time Trump’s presence in the White House could mean vast GOP losses. At the rate things are going now, I’d wager that congressional Republicans will find a way to impeach him within the year.

What do you think?

(03-24-2017, 12:44 AM)Dill Wrote: I won't say within the year, but I have already made it clear I think he won't make four years.

Adding to the intelligence scandal is his inability to work with his own Congress as his polls drop to historic lows for a president in his honeymoon phase with Congress.

The weekly unforced errors continue to add up. Publicly Republicans will want to speak of Trump's "style" and new way of doing things which by god won him the election, but privately they see the liability of a president who cannot come to Congress with close knowledge of the bills and policies he is supposedly stumping for.

It is possible that serious foreign policy misstep which costs American lives will be the catalyst. He hasn't been talking about ISIS lately, and he promised he wouldn't telegraph any strikes. Something maybe in the offing there, or he may want to force something that Mattis and the DOD resist--another fail.

I am still puzzled that so many people think that if their team doesn't make the playoffs every year, then they couldn't do any worse by hiring a head coach who has never played or coached football, but was really great as director of the stadium concessions.  If he is making bad trades and replacing good offensive and defensive coaches with friends and family, and engaging in late-night tweet wars with angry fans and players from other teams, we still need to wait till the season actually starts before we criticize him. Some even speak as if he'll not only last out his contract but get a four year extension because he keeps saying they'll be so tired of winning . . . .

(03-24-2017, 07:12 AM)GMDino Wrote: Maybe this will end the "we need to run the country like a business" talk from  most people.

My extremely conservative boss and I were talking yesterday and I mentioned that Pence will be hard to beat in 2020.  He asked why and I explained that this isn't 2000 anymore and voters forget quicker about the company that politicians kept.  He didn't even argue that Trump won't run/won't be there to run then.

I guess we'll see how it all plays out.

"Give him a chance." ™

(03-24-2017, 09:37 AM)bfine32 Wrote: Or perhaps it will end the "we need a Washington outsider' talk from others.

It is telling that you use "Give him a chance" as some sort of condescending tag line. I'm willing to give him some time as we are a country of checks and balances.  

(03-24-2017, 09:42 AM)GMDino Wrote: It's telling that you find it condescending.

(03-24-2017, 09:44 AM)michaelsean Wrote: You don't have to give him a chance if you don't want, because in the end it's pretty much irrelevant whether you do or I do or don't give him a chance.  

(03-24-2017, 09:46 AM)GMDino Wrote: I see it the opposite way.  He get's all the chances in the world until he does something so bad someone who can takes those chances away.

I, we, can't do anything for another four years except keep an eye on what he is doing with those "chances".

(03-24-2017, 09:50 AM)michaelsean Wrote: Yeah in four years.  The chance was actually given to him in November.  Giving him a chance or not giving him a chance now really means very little.

(03-24-2017, 12:44 AM)Dill Wrote: I won't say within the year, but I have already made it clear I think he won't make four years.

Adding to the intelligence scandal is his inability to work with his own Congress as his polls drop to historic lows for a president in his honeymoon phase with Congress.

The weekly unforced errors continue to add up. Publicly Republicans will want to speak of Trump's "style" and new way of doing things which by god won him the election, but privately they see the liability of a president who cannot come to Congress with close knowledge of the bills and policies he is supposedly stumping for.

It is possible that serious foreign policy misstep which costs American lives will be the catalyst. He hasn't been talking about ISIS lately, and he promised he wouldn't telegraph any strikes. Something maybe in the offing there, or he may want to force something that Mattis and the DOD resist--another fail.

I am still puzzled that so many people think that if their team doesn't make the playoffs every year, then they couldn't do any worse by hiring a head coach who has never played or coached football, but was really great as director of the stadium concessions.  If he is making bad trades and replacing good offensive and defensive coaches with friends and family, and engaging in late-night tweet wars with angry fans and players from other teams, we still need to wait till the season actually starts before we criticize him. Some even speak as if he'll not only last out his contract but get a four year extension because he keeps saying they'll be so tired of winning . . . .

(03-31-2017, 11:56 AM)xxlt Wrote: http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2017/03/30/president-donald-trump-impeachment-resolution-berkeley-alameda-richmond/

https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2017/03/30/cambridge-trump-has-got/WJgHMk10pUvqXLaycYDBmO/story.html

These things only matter in the sense that all politics is local...

Latest odds here:

https://www.inverse.com/article/26292-donald-trump-impeachment-odds

and here:

https://independentaustralia.net/life/life-display/will-mad-king-trump-be-impeached-place-your-bets,10154

They have a line on golden shower footage appearing on Red Tube at the last link...

(03-31-2017, 11:56 AM)xxlt Wrote: They have a line on golden shower footage appearing on Red Tube at the last link...

(04-01-2017, 01:13 PM)Rotobeast Wrote: That's to be even more likely, now that the Net Neutrality bill passed.
Anonymous claims to have the tape, but was keeping it as an ace.
Look for them to use it as a bargaining chip, if they actually have it.

(04-01-2017, 01:33 PM)xxlt Wrote: As for watching - hell, I still haven't seen the Pamela and Tommy Lee video. I am so behind on my celebrity porn viewing. If only spinach would do for my forearms what it did for Popeye's...

(04-01-2017, 08:05 PM)Rotobeast Wrote: Tommy's hung like a bear !
But anyway... as long as you've seen the Tonya Harding tapes.
Those were quality.