+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Cincinnati-Bengals-NFL)
+--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-JUNGLE-NOISE)
+--- Thread: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 (/Thread-Peerman-gets-activated-not-WJ3)
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Tlawsonmariat82 - 11-29-2016
I've never seen logic like this in my life..you select a corner in round 1,and even when it's obvious the season is lost you choose to bring back an aging veteran who primarily plays on st over a rookie who could benefit from these snaps immensely I don't get it I must be missing something
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Tlawsonmariat82 - 11-29-2016
I've never seen logic like this in my life..you select a corner in round 1,and even when it's obvious the season is lost you choose to bring back an aging veteran who primarily plays on st over a rookie who could benefit from these snaps immensely I don't get it I must be missing something.
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - BengalsRocker - 11-29-2016
(11-29-2016, 12:45 PM)Tlawsonmariat82 Wrote: I've never seen logic like this in my life..you select a corner in round 1,and even when it's obvious the season is lost you choose to bring back an aging veteran who primarily plays on st over a rookie who could benefit from these snaps immensely I don't get it I must be missing something.
My guess is that the need for a 3rd running back outweighed chancing reinjuring a pectoral muscle.
I'm just channeling Marvin here.
Not the other hogwash excuses some posters have provided.