(07-30-2021, 10:46 PM)Tiger Teeth Wrote: I like how you put that.  I'm leaning towards a yes on keepers.  Good point Bob!

(07-30-2021, 12:07 PM)Wes Mantooth Wrote: Does anyone have an opinion on my suggestion of 1 QB, 1 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 2 Flex, 1 D, 1 K Lineup?  

Note: The key difference is instead of having to start to 2 running backs, you have the option of using 1 RB, and another  WR or TE with your extra flex.  Obviously you can still start two running backs if you like; hell, you can start 3.  It just gives you more options to build your lineup week to week.

With this being a 12 team league, and with the NFL just not having a ton of great backs anymore, it gets tough for some rosters late in the year to fill that 2nd spot with anyone that isn't a total turd. To each their own, but I don't think the old lineup setting works well for 12 man leagues nowadays.

(07-31-2021, 03:02 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I'm down except I'd rather see 2 W/T. Too many people are put at a disadvantage having to start a TE. Quite a bit of drop off from Kelce to the 10-12 TE in the league. So unless anyone has any objections we'll do the following:

No keepers

Standard Snake Draft

1 QB/1 RB/3 W-T/ 2 Flex/ 1 D/ 1 K

(07-31-2021, 03:02 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I'm down except I'd rather see 2 W/T. Too many people are put at a disadvantage having to start a TE. Quite a bit of drop off from Kelce to the 10-12 TE in the league. So unless anyone has any objections we'll do the following:

No keepers

Standard Snake Draft

1 QB/1 RB/3 W-T/ 2 Flex/ 1 D/ 1 K

(07-31-2021, 10:37 PM)Wes Mantooth Wrote: Honestly, just set the settings back to what they were last year.  I don't like this at all.

(07-31-2021, 10:56 PM)bfine32 Wrote: It's exactly what you suggested except you can chose between a TE and a WR. 

(08-01-2021, 09:38 AM)Wes Mantooth Wrote: No it's not.  I wanted the 2nd RB spot to be turned into a flex.  You added another flex on top of that and got rid of the TE position.  

(07-30-2021, 12:07 PM)Wes Mantooth Wrote: Does anyone have an opinion on my suggestion of 1 QB, 1 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 2 Flex, 1 D, 1 K Lineup?  

(07-31-2021, 03:02 PM)bfine32 Wrote: 1 QB/1 RB/3 W-T/ 2 Flex/ 1 D/ 1 K

(07-31-2021, 10:56 PM)bfine32 Wrote: It's exactly what you suggested except you can chose between a TE and a WR. 

(08-01-2021, 09:38 AM)Wes Mantooth Wrote: No it's not.  I wanted the 2nd RB spot to be turned into a flex.  You added another flex on top of that and got rid of the TE position.  

(08-01-2021, 11:03 AM)BobJones4980 Wrote: RB talent is scarce so change one to flex = Good

TE talent even more scarce so change to flex = Bad

Not sure I get your mindset here.

(08-01-2021, 01:19 PM)Wes Mantooth Wrote: I'm out.  I don't need to be lectured over a free fantasy football league.  Good luck to everyone.

(08-01-2021, 02:07 PM)Vas Deferens Wrote: This is great.

(08-01-2021, 02:47 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Don't make me lecture you

(08-01-2021, 05:07 PM)Synric Wrote: So I'm joining just in time for the drama.

(08-01-2021, 05:05 PM)BobJones4980 Wrote: I guess if someone wants to leave over a TE spot then so be it, weird hill to die on.

(08-01-2021, 07:37 PM)Wes Mantooth Wrote: Would have been fine with the TE thing had there been a vote and some respectful conversation about it.  Except he brought it up 3 pages back and you and him were the only ones who wanted it.

I voice my opinion again (did it days ago along with others), and am told this is basically what I asked for.  It's not.  It's not even close.  Then I try to explain it and am railroaded by the two of you (the only people out of 12 who voted yes) telling me I'm weird, or that I like yelling at clouds.

Well guess what?  I don't need you to explain this to me, nor do I need the jabs.  Not having to start a TE is stupid.  The two people who wanted this get their way (Last place and 2nd to place, real experts).  Congrats.