+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Cincinnati-Bengals-NFL)
+--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-JUNGLE-NOISE)
+--- Thread: Aaron Rodgers released? (/Thread-Aaron-Rodgers-released)
Aaron Rodgers released? - Jpoore - 12-24-2017
Very good possibility due to violation of ir rule. If we could sign Rodgers....... Man our team would be instantly sb favorite
RE: Aaron Rodgers released? - HarleyDog - 12-24-2017
(12-24-2017, 09:39 AM)Jpoore Wrote: Very good possibility due to violation of ir rule. If we could sign Rodgers....... Man our team would be instantly sb favorite
Ahhh heck, it's Christmas so I will let this one slide and keep the sarcastic comment to myself. However, if it's on your Christmas list, remove it to prevent disappointment. Green Bay is one of the league elites and typical rules that apply to teams like ours, do not apply in Green Bay.
Dilly Dilly.
RE: Aaron Rodgers released? - McC - 12-24-2017
Chances of it happening are slim to none and if it somehow did, he would be a Brown.
RE: Aaron Rodgers released? - pally - 12-24-2017
(12-24-2017, 09:39 AM)Jpoore Wrote: Very good possibility due to violation of ir rule. If we could sign Rodgers....... Man our team would be instantly sb favorite
No possibility of Rodgers being released. And if he were, there is zero chance he would drop far enough for us to claim him.
RE: Aaron Rodgers released? - wcu - 12-24-2017
(12-24-2017, 09:52 AM)pally Wrote: No possibility of Rodgers being released. And if he were, there is zero chance he would drop far enough for us to claim him.
He’s a vested veteran. If he were released, he wouldn’t be subject to waivers and would be free to sign with any team he chose.
RE: Aaron Rodgers released? - HarleyDog - 12-24-2017
(12-24-2017, 10:10 AM)wcu Wrote: He’s a vested veteran. If he were released, he wouldn’t be subject to waivers and would be free to sign with any team he chose.
Which would be Green Bay.
RE: Aaron Rodgers released? - Jpoore - 12-24-2017
(12-24-2017, 10:14 AM)HarleyDog Wrote: Which would be Green Bay.
The comments he's made he last 2-3 years suggest he's unhappy.
RE: Aaron Rodgers released? - Jpoore - 12-24-2017
By rule he should have to be released
RE: Aaron Rodgers released? - PDub80 - 12-24-2017
(12-24-2017, 09:52 AM)pally Wrote: No possibility of Rodgers being released. And if he were, there is zero chance he would drop far enough for us to claim him.
Somewhere out there a Browns message board already has a 45 page thread on dissecting this as a real possibility and thinking it's going to happen.
RE: Aaron Rodgers released? - rfaulk34 - 12-24-2017
Perfect time for the league to step in, with Ben more than likely retiring after this year, and make sure the Pack stick to the rules as written. Gives Rodgers a chance to sign with Pitt and win 2 or 3 more SBs before he retires in 10 years.
RE: Aaron Rodgers released? - wcu - 12-24-2017
(12-24-2017, 10:14 AM)HarleyDog Wrote: Which would be Green Bay.
Green Bay or not, it certainly wouldn’t be here.
RE: Aaron Rodgers released? - jfkbengals - 12-24-2017
(12-24-2017, 10:23 AM)Jpoore Wrote: By rule he should have to be released
For what reason? Playing injured?
RE: Aaron Rodgers released? - rfaulk34 - 12-24-2017
(12-24-2017, 10:57 AM)jfkbengals Wrote: For what reason? Playing injured?
To go back on IR, he needs to have a "new" injury.
RE: Aaron Rodgers released? - jfkbengals - 12-24-2017
(12-24-2017, 10:58 AM)rfaulk34 Wrote: To go back on IR, he needs to have a "new" injury.
No, he just needs to be injured, and his collarbone was not yet 100% when he came back.
RE: Aaron Rodgers released? - wcu - 12-24-2017
(12-24-2017, 11:01 AM)jfkbengals Wrote: No, he just needs to be injured, and his collarbone was not yet 100% when he came back.
“NFL rules stipulate that a player needs to have suffered a new injury that would sideline him at least six weeks to be placed on injured reserve and, if that is not the case, the team is obligated to release the player once he is healthy.”
http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/21863467/teams-complain-nfl-green-bay-packers-violated-ir-rule-think-aaron-rodgers-released
RE: Aaron Rodgers released? - rfaulk34 - 12-24-2017
(12-24-2017, 11:01 AM)jfkbengals Wrote: No, he just needs to be injured, and his collarbone was not yet 100% when he came back.
No, to your no.
RE: Aaron Rodgers released? - Fullrock - 12-24-2017
Aaron Rodgers was seen this morning leaving the Green Bay facility with a mysterious boot on his foot and on crutches. This after he walked into the facility this morning with no apparent foot injury. LOL!
RE: Aaron Rodgers released? - rfaulk34 - 12-24-2017
(12-24-2017, 11:22 AM)Fullrock Wrote: Aaron Rodgers was seen this morning leaving the Green Bay facility with a mysterious boot on his foot and on crutches. This after he walked into the facility this morning with no apparent foot injury. LOL!
Sounds about right. But if you don't want it to look sketchy, wouldn't it have been easier to say it was a new muscle injury somewhere around the surgery area?
RE: Aaron Rodgers released? - reuben.ahmed - 12-24-2017
nominated as worst thread ever on xmas eve
RE: Aaron Rodgers released? - StoneTheCrow - 12-24-2017
Let’s get him. Also let’s get Robert Kraft and Bill Belichick too. Let’s put Jerry Rice in a time machine and sign 1987 Jerry Rice. Special advisor-Vince Lombardi. Scouting department will consist of Jesus and Santa.