Drumph backs Romney - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Off Topic Forums (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Off-Topic-Forums) +--- Forum: Politics & Religion 2.0 (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Politics-Religion-2-0) +---- Forum: P & R Archive (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-P-R-Archive) +---- Thread: Drumph backs Romney (/Thread-Drumph-backs-Romney) |
Drumph backs Romney - ballsofsteel - 02-20-2018 This is too funny. After the humiliating loss of backing the sexual predator Roy Moore, Drumph came out today backing Mitt Romney 100% for his senate run in Utah and said what a great person he is. What is Hilarious is Mitt is going to win that senate seat in a landslide with or without Drumphs endorsement. Drumph wants to associate himself to a winner for a change. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/02/19/trump-endorses-recent-gop-foe-mitt-romney-for-utah-senate.html RE: Drumph backs Romney - fredtoast - 02-20-2018 Saddest part is that Romney thanked Trump for his support after calling Trump a phony, a fraud, and unfit to be President. Politics is disgusting. RE: Drumph backs Romney - ballsofsteel - 02-20-2018 (02-20-2018, 07:48 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Saddest part is that Romney thanked Trump for his support after calling Trump a phony, a fraud, and unfit to be President. Exactly, and Drumph said Romney was a "choker" and that he "chokes likes a dog." What a bunch of pathetic phonies. RE: Drumph backs Romney - BmorePat87 - 02-20-2018 (02-20-2018, 07:48 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Saddest part is that Romney thanked Trump for his support after calling Trump a phony, a fraud, and unfit to be President. Cruz also buried his nose in Trump's ass after Trump called his wife an ugo. RE: Drumph backs Romney - ballsofsteel - 02-21-2018 When it finally dawned on him that the Evangelicals choice Mike Suckabee didn't have a "prayer" on being elected President that is when he cut a deal with Drumph not to say anything negative about him if he gave his mule face daughter a job if he won the election. RE: Drumph backs Romney - Johnny Cupcakes - 02-21-2018 (02-21-2018, 07:26 AM)ballsofsteel Wrote: When it finally dawned on him that the Evangelicals choice Mike Suckabee didn't have a "prayer" on being elected President that is when he cut a deal with Drumph not to say anything negative about him if he gave his mule face daughter a job if he won the election. What is with the attacks on the appearance of politicians that we disagree with? Why is this a go to thing? Buncha adult bullies....no wonder this is the route that kids take. Set an example...don't be part of the problem. RE: Drumph backs Romney - ballsofsteel - 02-21-2018 (02-21-2018, 09:46 AM)Johnny Cupcakes Wrote: What is with the attacks on the appearance of politicians that we disagree with? Why is this a go to thing? Buncha adult bullies....no wonder this is the route that kids take. Just following Drumph's lead. RE: Drumph backs Romney - GMDino - 02-21-2018 RE: Drumph backs Romney - Griever - 02-22-2018 (02-21-2018, 10:35 PM)GMDino Wrote: spine-ectomy RE: Drumph backs Romney - ballsofsteel - 02-22-2018 I know that there are a few of you guys who post here that don't care for Drumph. Whether your dislike is because he is a sexual predator, a lier,cheat and fraud and a con man. Try to put all these character flaws aside and respect the office of the presidency. Thank you. RE: Drumph backs Romney - TheLeonardLeap - 02-22-2018 Breaking News: Politicians are Hypocrites Trump bashes Romney, then endorses him. Obama bashes Clinton (2012), then endorses her (2016). They're all this way, and being shocked/surprised is a waste of time even thinking about it. RE: Drumph backs Romney - SunsetBengal - 02-22-2018 (02-22-2018, 06:16 PM)ballsofsteel Wrote: I know that there are a few of you guys who post here that don't care for Drumph. Whether your dislike is because he is a sexual predator, a lier,cheat and fraud and a con man. Try to put all these character flaws aside and respect the office of the presidency. Thank you. Perhaps you should take your own advice? RE: Drumph backs Romney - ballsofsteel - 02-27-2018 (02-22-2018, 11:02 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Breaking News: Politicians are Hypocrites Braking news Obama didn't "bash" Clinton, not even close. . Drumph and Romney made it personal hurling personal insults against each other. Nice try. RE: Drumph backs Romney - ballsofsteel - 02-27-2018 (02-22-2018, 11:14 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Perhaps you should take your own advice? I will try my best. RE: Drumph backs Romney - bfine32 - 02-27-2018 (02-27-2018, 07:58 AM)ballsofsteel Wrote: Braking news Obama didn't "bash" Clinton, not even close. . Drumph and Romney made it personal hurling personal insults against each other. Nice try. Wasn't Hillary's team the first to question the Obama birth certificate? RE: Drumph backs Romney - GMDino - 02-27-2018 (02-27-2018, 09:53 AM)bfine32 Wrote: Wasn't Hillary's team the first to question the Obama birth certificate? http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/sep/16/donald-trump/fact-checking-donald-trumps-claim-hillary-clinton-/ Quote:Trump said, "Hillary Clinton and her campaign of 2008 started the birther controversy." https://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-started-birther-movement/ Quote:That Hillary Clinton supporters circulated such an e-mail isn’t in question, but the claim that that’s the moment the birther theory “first emerged” simply isn’t true. The likeliest point of origin we’ve been able to find was a post on conservative message board FreeRepublic.com dated 1 March 2008 (which, according to a report in The Telegraph, was at least a month before Clinton supporters got on the e-mail bandwagon): If someone chooses to still believe this was the "Clinton campaign's" idea/fault (which is false) they are probably hard pressed to also admit that the POTUS said he had proof that Obama was not born in the US for another 8 years after that. RE: Drumph backs Romney - BmorePat87 - 02-27-2018 (02-22-2018, 11:14 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Perhaps you should take your own advice? Pretty sure that was sarcasm and mocking of those who excuse his garbage human status because he's President. RE: Drumph backs Romney - bfine32 - 02-27-2018 (02-27-2018, 10:00 AM)GMDino Wrote: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/sep/16/donald-trump/fact-checking-donald-trumps-claim-hillary-clinton-/ I was simply trying to illustrate the current POTUS does not own a monopoly on getting in the gutter when running against a political opponent and that once he/she has been victorious or vanquished they always move back to the position that best helps the party. Just look at Bernie RE: Drumph backs Romney - GMDino - 02-27-2018 (02-27-2018, 11:43 AM)bfine32 Wrote: I was simply trying to illustrate the current POTUS does not own a monopoly on getting in the gutter when running against a political opponent and that once he/she has been victorious or vanquished they always move back to the position that best helps the party. Just look at Bernie But you illustrated it with a falsehood. RE: Drumph backs Romney - BmorePat87 - 02-27-2018 (02-27-2018, 11:43 AM)bfine32 Wrote: I was simply trying to illustrate the current POTUS does not own a monopoly on getting in the gutter when running against a political opponent and that once he/she has been victorious or vanquished they always move back to the position that best helps the party. Just look at Bernie what are we defining the gutter as, though? I don't recall the Democratic primary involving candidates openly mocking the appearances of wives, talking about their penis size, using insulting nick names, or making up conspiracy theories about candidates dads killing Presidents. |