+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Cincinnati-Bengals-NFL)
+--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-JUNGLE-NOISE)
+--- Thread: Jets Trade Proposal (/Thread-Jets-Trade-Proposal)
Jets Trade Proposal - c12schleyer - 08-11-2018
Here’s a thought and let me know what you think... the Bengals and Jets make a trade.
Bengals receive:
Teddy Bridgewater
Jets receive:
Michael Johnson
Both teams fill a need without any real change in the salary cap. It’s a win-win in my opinion.
P.S.- Barkley is garbage
RE: Jets Trade Proposal - Socal Bengals fan - 08-11-2018
I like
RE: Jets Trade Proposal - HarleyDog - 08-11-2018
Not a bad idea. Doubt coaches are ready to write our backups as bad as we consider them to be. But very interesting scenario. Would like that move.
RE: Jets Trade Proposal - c12schleyer - 08-11-2018
(08-11-2018, 12:25 PM)HarleyDog Wrote: Not a bad idea. Doubt coaches are ready to write our backups as bad as we consider them to be. But very interesting scenario. Would like that move.
I hear you, but Bridgewater is going to increase in value as camp goes on. If we want him we need to move on him. The trade gives us a proven commodity of success in the NFL, Barkley hasn’t done anything worthwhile since his days at USC
RE: Jets Trade Proposal - Synric - 08-11-2018
I wonder if the Steelers are giving up on Josh Dobbs or are they going to carry 3 QBs.
RE: Jets Trade Proposal - Luvnit2 - 08-11-2018
(08-11-2018, 12:18 PM)c12schleyer Wrote: Here’s a thought and let me know what you think... the Bengals and Jets make a trade.
Bengals receive:
Teddy Bridgewater
Jets receive:
Michael Johnson
Both teams fill a need without any real change in the salary cap. It’s a win-win in my opinion.
P.S.- Barkley is garbage
1st trades rarely happen in preseason. Next, why would a rebuilding Jets team want with an overpaid (old) DL?
The other issue is I believe Teddy's contract is up soon, so do we really want to pay a back up QB big bucks for a year or maybe 2 only to have him leave in FA.
RE: Jets Trade Proposal - J24 - 08-11-2018
I like Driskel and I want to see what Woodside can do before we make a trade for a QB.
RE: Jets Trade Proposal - c12schleyer - 08-11-2018
(08-11-2018, 12:47 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: 1st trades rarely happen in preseason. Next, why would a rebuilding Jets team want with an overpaid (old) DL?
The other issue is I believe Teddy's contract is up soon, so do we really want to pay a back up QB big bucks for a year or maybe 2 only to have him leave in FA.
MJ and Bridgewater are virtually identical cap hits. The Jets are rebuilding but could use a veteran presence on the DL and in the locker room. Consider him the defensive McCown.
Trades happen in preseason if the players involved are going to end up cut. And that could be the case with MJ and Bridgewater.
RE: Jets Trade Proposal - c12schleyer - 08-11-2018
(08-11-2018, 01:08 PM)Jakeypoo Wrote: I like Driskel and I want to see what Woodside can do before we make a trade for a QB.
Driskel is an unknown... I feel more comfortable with a guy like Bridgewater who has proven himself in the NFL.
RE: Jets Trade Proposal - Wyche'sWarrior - 08-11-2018
(08-11-2018, 01:11 PM)c12schleyer Wrote: Driskel is an unknown... I feel more comfortable with a guy like Bridgewater who has proven himself in the NFL.
Yeah....I'd rather have Teddy than any of the scrub backups we have. He looked sharp against ATL.
RE: Jets Trade Proposal - HarleyDog - 08-11-2018
(08-11-2018, 12:47 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: 1st trades rarely happen in preseason. Next, why would a rebuilding Jets team want with an overpaid (old) DL?
The other issue is I believe Teddy's contract is up soon, so do we really want to pay a back up QB big bucks for a year or maybe 2 only to have him leave in FA.
Good points. MJ is serviceable but not worth what he's being paid. However, if the scenario worked out it would be good for us. Even if Bridgewater was only here 2 yrs, we could find out if he was worth keeping, and also work on strengthening the depth chart at QB.
RE: Jets Trade Proposal - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 08-11-2018
(08-11-2018, 01:11 PM)c12schleyer Wrote: Driskel is an unknown... I feel more comfortable with a guy like Bridgewater who has proven himself in the NFL.
I agree, but i like what i see from Driskel. Still would love that trade you spoke of.
Barkley sounds pretty bad from what all of you are saying. I only saw the one nice pass to Malone so i didn't get to
see the bad. Have heard nothing about Woodside at all. Need a better backup QB it seems.
RE: Jets Trade Proposal - Luvnit2 - 08-11-2018
(08-11-2018, 01:40 PM)HarleyDog Wrote: Good points. MJ is serviceable but not worth what he's being paid. However, if the scenario worked out it would be good for us. Even if Bridgewater was only here 2 yrs, we could find out if he was worth keeping, and also work on strengthening the depth chart at QB.
I agree, Jets would be morons to trade straight for MJ in a rebuilding year for them. That was my main point and this is not fantasy football.
RE: Jets Trade Proposal - TSwigZ - 08-11-2018
Jets would never do this.
RE: Jets Trade Proposal - TheUberHuber - 08-11-2018
(08-11-2018, 12:18 PM)c12schleyer Wrote: Here’s a thought and let me know what you think... the Bengals and Jets make a trade.
Bengals receive:
Teddy Bridgewater
Jets receive:
Michael Johnson
Both teams fill a need without any real change in the salary cap. It’s a win-win in my opinion.
P.S.- Barkley is garbage
Not going to happen..
I would rather just sign colin Kaepernick
RE: Jets Trade Proposal - TheUberHuber - 08-11-2018
(08-11-2018, 01:49 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: I agree, but i like what i see from Driskel. Still would love that trade you spoke of.
Barkley sounds pretty bad from what all of you are saying. I only saw the one nice pass to Malone so i didn't get to
see the bad. Have heard nothing about Woodside at all. Need a better backup QB it seems.
If andy goes down we are definitely in trouble. Driskel has potential imo, but i would like a more proven backup. I would like to see driskel go against first teamers before calling him a decent backup option. being out of market i doubt i will get to watch any pre season games though.
Edit.. i agree barkley is terrible
RE: Jets Trade Proposal - bfine32 - 08-11-2018
I have a feeling McCown is the odd man out in NYJ
RE: Jets Trade Proposal - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 08-11-2018
(08-11-2018, 02:26 PM)TheUberHuber Wrote: If andy goes down we are definitely in trouble. Driskel has potential imo, but i would like a more proven backup. I would like to see driskel go against first teamers before calling him a decent backup option. being out of market i doubt i will get to watch any pre season games though.
Edit.. i agree barkley is terrible
Yeah, but AJM played decent against first teamers and than ended up sucking last year against backups.
Driskel was better than him last year and it was pretty clear.
I agree, would like to see Driskel against some first teamers.
You should be able to see the Bills game, it is on FOX a nationally televised game.
RE: Jets Trade Proposal - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 08-11-2018
(08-11-2018, 03:00 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I have a feeling McCown is the odd man out in NYJ
Would be all for snatching up McCown then.
RE: Jets Trade Proposal - corpjet - 08-11-2018
We need a true backup QB, Im all for trading whoever is gong to get cut for a serviceable back up signal caller.