+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Cincinnati-Bengals-NFL)
+--- Forum: Draft Central (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Draft-Central)
+--- Thread: First the draft network mock. (/Thread-First-the-draft-network-mock)
First the draft network mock. - Jpoore - 02-25-2019
One thing of note is how we always complained how these other ones were completely unrealistic. I love the draft networks(except for no trades) but it tends to go a little the other way and too tough. That said here's my first one complain about it. I couldn't not take Butler there and if green gets hurt gives us a legitimate weapon.
11
Chris Lindstrom
, IOL
42
Devin Bush Jr.
, LB
72
Hakeem Butler
, WR
104
Kaleb McGary
, OT
139
Tyree Jackson
, QB
170
Isaiah Prince
, OT
185
Lukas Denis
, S
201
Andrew Beck
, TE
RE: First the draft network mock. - Hammerstripes - 02-27-2019
I'm not sure if I'm reading the formatting correctly. Is Lindstrom your pick at #11?
RE: First the draft network mock. - Jpoore - 02-27-2019
(02-27-2019, 05:32 PM)Hammerstripes Wrote: I'm not sure if I'm reading the formatting correctly. Is Lindstrom your pick at #11?
Yes.
RE: First the draft network mock. - MentalRage - 02-28-2019
I don't usually disagree with your takes, but Lindstrom at 11 is so early imo.
RE: First the draft network mock. - Hammerstripes - 02-28-2019
He's nowhere near the top OG in the class. If you take one at #11, it better be the best one.
RE: First the draft network mock. - Jpoore - 02-28-2019
(02-28-2019, 12:37 PM)MentalRage Wrote: I don't usually disagree with your takes, but Lindstrom at 11 is so early imo.
He's majorly slept on. The versatility to play tackle or guard at a high level. In every single mock he's gone by pick 20.
RE: First the draft network mock. - Jpoore - 02-28-2019
(02-28-2019, 03:48 PM)Hammerstripes Wrote: He's nowhere near the top OG in the class. If you take one at #11, it better be the best one.He is the best. By a very substantial margin. His versatility to play tackle or guard at a high level is what draws me to him. He goes top 20 on every single mock. It's a little early but not insanely. He's great in every aspect.
RE: First the draft network mock. - ochocincos - 03-01-2019
(02-28-2019, 10:45 PM)Jpoore Wrote: He's majorly slept on. The versatility to play tackle or guard at a high level. In every single mock he's gone by pick 20.
Umm, in every single mock on some specific website? Because Peter Schrager just released his mock yesterday and Lindstrom is not in the first round.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001019166/article/peter-schrager-2019-nfl-mock-draft-10-kyler-murray-goes-no-1
Also, I don't know which mocks you've been looking at, but I've not seen Lindstrom mocked in the first in any mock that I've seen up to this point.
RE: First the draft network mock. - Bengalpool - 03-01-2019
(03-01-2019, 11:08 AM)ochocincos Wrote: Umm, in every single mock on some specific website? Because Peter Schrager just released his mock yesterday and Lindstrom is not in the first round.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001019166/article/peter-schrager-2019-nfl-mock-draft-10-kyler-murray-goes-no-1
Also, I don't know which mocks you've been looking at, but I've not seen Lindstrom mocked in the first in any mock that I've seen up to this point.
Beat me to it. Late second/Early third.
RE: First the draft network mock. - Hammerstripes - 03-01-2019
(02-28-2019, 10:47 PM)Jpoore Wrote: He is the best. By a very substantial margin. His versatility to play tackle or guard at a high level is what draws me to him. He goes top 20 on every single mock. It's a little early but not insanely. He's great in every aspect.
Well, there's at least 2 other guys that have that same characteristic that are much better than he is.