+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Off Topic Forums (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Off-Topic-Forums)
+--- Forum: Politics & Religion 2.0 (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Politics-Religion-2-0)
+---- Forum: P & R Archive (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-P-R-Archive)
+---- Thread: Trump just inadvertently argued that the DOJ can indict a sitting POTUS (/Thread-Trump-just-inadvertently-argued-that-the-DOJ-can-indict-a-sitting-POTUS)
Trump just inadvertently argued that the DOJ can indict a sitting POTUS - BmorePat87 - 05-30-2019
The Greatest Presidential Harassment in history. After spending $40,000,000 over two dark years, with unlimited access, people, resources and cooperation, highly conflicted Robert Mueller would have brought charges, if he had ANYTHING, but there were no charges to bring!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 30, 2019
RE: Trump just inadvertently argued that the DOJ can indict a sitting POTUS - GMDino - 05-30-2019
(05-30-2019, 02:15 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote:The Greatest Presidential Harassment in history. After spending $40,000,000 over two dark years, with unlimited access, people, resources and cooperation, highly conflicted Robert Mueller would have brought charges, if he had ANYTHING, but there were no charges to bring!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 30, 2019
DJT can't be bothered to understand or learn anything. And his supporters believe every word the liar says.
RE: Trump just inadvertently argued that the DOJ can indict a sitting POTUS - jj22 - 05-30-2019
His supporters can't be bother to read the report, or watch what Mueller said which is there for everyone to hear. Trump plays them for fools and they willingly act the role.
RE: Trump just inadvertently argued that the DOJ can indict a sitting POTUS - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 05-30-2019
(05-30-2019, 03:05 PM)jj22 Wrote: His supporters can't be bother to read the report, or watch what Mueller said which is there for everyone to hear. Trump plays them for fools and they willingly act the role.
As someone who has clearly read the report, perhaps you could post some excerpts that prove Trump colluded with the Russians?
RE: Trump just inadvertently argued that the DOJ can indict a sitting POTUS - NATI BENGALS - 05-31-2019
(05-30-2019, 10:58 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: As someone who has clearly read the report, perhaps you could post some excerpts that prove Trump colluded with the Russians?
I didnt read the report.
I thought the orange anus with a comb over said this
https://youtu.be/-b71f2eYdTc
Listen to the last couple lines of Mueller from the other day. As a patriotic conservative by the book American he warns us all about Russia. There is a big difference in a true patriot. And a lying conman bag of shit who openly invited and now obstructs and covers up what happened.
The blind party loyalty is disgusting
RE: Trump just inadvertently argued that the DOJ can indict a sitting POTUS - BmorePat87 - 05-31-2019
(05-30-2019, 10:58 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: As someone who has clearly read the report, perhaps you could post some excerpts that prove Trump colluded with the Russians?
Does the report have to prove Trump colluded with Russia in order for one to dismiss Trump supporters who proclaimed it exonerated him without reading it?
RE: Trump just inadvertently argued that the DOJ can indict a sitting POTUS - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 05-31-2019
(05-31-2019, 09:11 AM)BmorePat87 Wrote: Does the report have to prove Trump colluded with Russia in order for one to dismiss Trump supporters who proclaimed it exonerated him without reading it?
Not in the slightest. I just wanted the person who castigated others who "haven't read the report" the summarize the report he's clearly read.