+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Cincinnati-Bengals-NFL)
+--- Forum: Bengals GameDay! (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Bengals-GameDay)
+---- Forum: GameDay Thread Archive (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-GameDay-Thread-Archive)
+----- Forum: 2019 GameDay Threads (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-2019-GameDay-Threads)
+----- Thread: ***Week 6 GameDay Thread - Bengals @ Ravens*** (/Thread-Week-6-GameDay-Thread-Bengals-Ravens)
RE: ***Week 6 GameDay Thread - Bengals @ Ravens*** - jj22 - 10-13-2019
Kick the field goal. Don't chase points this early. Make it a 1 score game.
RE: ***Week 6 GameDay Thread - Bengals @ Ravens*** - bfine32 - 10-13-2019
(10-13-2019, 03:28 PM)CincinnatiKid Wrote: Why are we running it
Did that answer your question?
RE: ***Week 6 GameDay Thread - Bengals @ Ravens*** - jfkbengals - 10-13-2019
(10-13-2019, 03:29 PM)The Caped Crusader Wrote: These end zone play calls... Wow
Yup.
Tate, CJ, and Eifert should be on the field at first and goal for 3 straight passes...
RE: ***Week 6 GameDay Thread - Bengals @ Ravens*** - The Caped Crusader - 10-13-2019
Take the points. Don't go for it.
RE: ***Week 6 GameDay Thread - Bengals @ Ravens*** - michaelsean - 10-13-2019
What a horrid series.
RE: ***Week 6 GameDay Thread - Bengals @ Ravens*** - Whacked - 10-13-2019
Well. We all know what happens after a Bengals TO = FAIL
RE: ***Week 6 GameDay Thread - Bengals @ Ravens*** - RunKijanaRun - 10-13-2019
These calls are worse than watching a fat girl striptease
RE: ***Week 6 GameDay Thread - Bengals @ Ravens*** - THE PISTONS - 10-13-2019
(10-13-2019, 03:28 PM)Synric Wrote: I would have tried the fade there. Auden Tate was 1 on 1 on the outside on the far hash.
You wouldn't throw to our shortest WR in Triple Coverage?
Yes, throwing to Tate would have been a great call.
RE: ***Week 6 GameDay Thread - Bengals @ Ravens*** - Nicomo Cosca - 10-13-2019
I can’t remember another Bengals team this bad in the red zone.
RE: ***Week 6 GameDay Thread - Bengals @ Ravens*** - bengaloo - 10-13-2019
I'm not impressed with Taylor's red zone play calling. What a flippin waste of a good drive lol.
RE: ***Week 6 GameDay Thread - Bengals @ Ravens*** - Tomkat - 10-13-2019
Baltimore got away with some holding on 3rd and goal!
RE: ***Week 6 GameDay Thread - Bengals @ Ravens*** - Synric - 10-13-2019
(10-13-2019, 03:30 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: You wouldn't throw to our shortest WR in Triple Coverage?
Yes, throwing to Tate would have been a great call.
I was talking about the first Mixon run.
RE: ***Week 6 GameDay Thread - Bengals @ Ravens*** - jfkbengals - 10-13-2019
(10-13-2019, 03:30 PM)jj22 Wrote: Kick the field goal. Don't chase points this early. Make it a 1 score game.
Fake it
RE: ***Week 6 GameDay Thread - Bengals @ Ravens*** - TheLeonardLeap - 10-13-2019
There is apparently no point in reviewable PI.
That is as blatant as can be.
RE: ***Week 6 GameDay Thread - Bengals @ Ravens*** - THE PISTONS - 10-13-2019
What is Taylor doing? He's running the play clock down to 0 while the game clock is stopped?
They're not going to call that PI. Erickson was barely touched.
***Week 6 GameDay Thread - Bengals @ Ravens*** - bjf123 - 10-13-2019
You could make a case for pass interference on that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RE: ***Week 6 GameDay Thread - Bengals @ Ravens*** - JumboTron - 10-13-2019
Taylor is in so far over his head it's sad.
RE: ***Week 6 GameDay Thread - Bengals @ Ravens*** - Andy2AJ - 10-13-2019
(10-13-2019, 03:30 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: And why isn't Eifert in on goal line and Erickson is??!!! And why do they run it up the middle twice on goal to go outside the 5??!!
What kind of stupid fuckery is this?
We should of used sample he was the best blocking tight end in the draft!
RE: ***Week 6 GameDay Thread - Bengals @ Ravens*** - CincinnatiKid - 10-13-2019
(10-13-2019, 03:30 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Did that answer your question?
Yup
RE: ***Week 6 GameDay Thread - Bengals @ Ravens*** - The Caped Crusader - 10-13-2019
100% that was PI