Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise
Roe Vs Wade Overturned - Printable Version

+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Off Topic Forums (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Off-Topic-Forums)
+--- Forum: Politics & Religion 2.0 (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Politics-Religion-2-0)
+--- Thread: Roe Vs Wade Overturned (/Thread-Roe-Vs-Wade-Overturned)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46


RE: Roe Vs Wade Overturned - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 08-11-2023

(08-11-2023, 06:34 AM)BigPapaKain Wrote: Oh nationally we're red. But since the topic at hand was a state issue, I was talking about our state legislature being illegally red.

My mistake for not being more direct in my comment. 

I see.  Yes, that is an important distinction.  State level California is much more purple than you'd think, but that's certainly not reflected in our state legislature either.  We're certainly a blue state, but not to the extent that the composition of our state legislature would have you believe.  So I get your point.


RE: Roe Vs Wade Overturned - pally - 08-12-2023

Texas with some of the strictest abortion laws in the country to the point of allowing grievous harm to a mother has now decided a fetus has no rights. In a lawsuit, a Bureau of Prison guard asserted she was having premature labor and asked to be relieved so she could get medical care. Only after several hours, when a replacement came in, was she allowed to leave to get that medical care. She delivered a stillborn child, that doctors claim would have survived if it had been delivered earlier.

The Texas AG is asserting that the child had no right to life under the federal constitution, even though he argued the opposite in challenges against Texas abortion laws.

Hypocrisy at its finest

https://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/texas-news/texass-position-on-rights-of-a-fetus-in-tension-after-a-prison-guards-stillbirth/3315305/#:~:text=The%20state%20of%20Texas%20is,intense%20pains%20similar%20to%20contractions.


RE: Roe Vs Wade Overturned - Belsnickel - 08-12-2023

(08-12-2023, 03:26 PM)pally Wrote: Texas with some of the strictest abortion laws in the country to the point of allowing grievous harm to a mother has now decided a fetus has no rights. In a lawsuit, a Bureau of Prison guard asserted she was having premature labor and asked to be relieved so she could get medical care. Only after several hours, when a replacement came in, was she allowed to leave to get that medical care. She delivered a stillborn child, that doctors claim would have survived if it had been delivered earlier.

The Texas AG is asserting that the child had no right to life under the federal constitution, even though he argued the opposite in challenges against Texas abortion laws.

Hypocrisy at its finest

https://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/texas-news/texass-position-on-rights-of-a-fetus-in-tension-after-a-prison-guards-stillbirth/3315305/#:~:text=The%20state%20of%20Texas%20is,intense%20pains%20similar%20to%20contractions.

I am shocked. Shocked I say.


RE: Roe Vs Wade Overturned - Dill - 08-13-2023

(08-12-2023, 03:26 PM)pally Wrote: The Texas AG is asserting that the child had no right to life under the federal constitution, even though he argued the opposite in challenges against Texas abortion laws.

[color=rgba(13, 13, 13, 0.9)]"This would not be the first time that the state has sought to claim to support the right to life of all fetuses, yet to act quite differently when it comes to protecting the health and safety of such fetuses other than in the very narrow area of prohibiting abortions," Hermer said.[/color]

Rather than always trying to understand the abortion issue as about a genuine question of whether a fetus is a person, perhaps it is better to look at the complex structure of laws now being built around anti-abortion law primarily in terms of the kinds of social control in enables over both women's bodies and the medical profession, and for whom that control is enabled.

I'm not doubting the sincerity of the vast majority of people who are anti-abortion, but the legal engineering around the issue to extend state control beyond states and the like, plus convenient exceptions like the above, suggest a rather larger "agenda" than just saving unborn lives. 

What that agenda might be I'm not sure, but it seems possible that enforcing a specific religious identity might be part of it, though people of different religious backgrounds might have very different ideas about what that should be. Just speculating here. 


RE: Roe Vs Wade Overturned - Belsnickel - 08-13-2023

(08-13-2023, 08:46 AM)Dill Wrote: Rather than always trying to understand the abortion issue as about a genuine question of whether a fetus is a person, perhaps it is better to look at the complex structure of laws now being built around anti-abortion law primarily in terms of the kinds of social control in enables over both women's bodies and the medical profession, and for whom that control is enabled.

I'm not doubting the sincerity of the vast majority of people who are anti-abortion, but the legal engineering around the issue to extend state control beyond states and the like, plus convenient exceptions like the above, suggest a rather larger "agenda" than just saving unborn lives. 

What that agenda might be I'm not sure, but it seems possible that enforcing a specific religious identity might be part of it, though people of different religious backgrounds might have very different ideas about what that should be. Just speculating here. 

At least your speculating is nicer than my wife's. Her statement was "that fetus didn't matter because it wasn't white."


RE: Roe Vs Wade Overturned - GMDino - 08-16-2023

So sad...and so unneeded.  It disgusts me.    Whatever

https://time.com/6303701/a-rape-in-mississippi/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=editorial&utm_term=u.s._abortion&linkId=229820205


Quote:She Wasn't Able to Get an Abortion. Now She's a Mom. Soon She'll Start 7th Grade. 
[img=962x1055]https://api.time.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/abortion-mississippi-girl-health-01.jpg?quality=85&w=2400[/img]
Ashley in Clarksdale, Miss., Aug. 1, 2023.[/color]

Lucy Garrett for TIME

[color=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.95)]BY CHARLOTTE ALTER/CLARKSDALE, MISS. [/url]
AUGUST 14, 2023 6:00 AM EDT
[/color]
Ashley just had a baby. She’s sitting on the couch in a relative’s apartment in Clarksdale, Miss., wearing camo-print leggings and fiddling with the plastic hospital bracelets still on her wrists. It’s August and pushing 90 degrees, which means the brown patterned curtains are drawn, the air conditioner is on high, and the room feels like a hiding place. Peanut, the baby boy she delivered two days earlier, is asleep in a car seat at her feet, dressed in a little blue outfit. Ashley is surrounded by family, but nobody is smiling. One relative silently eats lunch in the kitchen, her two siblings stare glumly at their phones, and her mother, Regina, watches from across the room. Ashley was discharged from the hospital only hours ago, but there are no baby presents or toys in the room, no visible diapers or ointments or bottles. Almost nobody knows that Peanut exists, because almost nobody knew that Ashley was pregnant. She is 13 years old. Soon she’ll start seventh grade.

In the fall of 2022, Ashley was raped by a stranger in the yard outside her home, her mother says. For weeks she didn’t tell anybody what happened, not even her mom. But Regina knew something was wrong. Ashley used to love going outside to make dances for her TikTok, but suddenly she refused to leave her bedroom. When she turned 13 that November, she wasn't in the mood to celebrate. “She just said, ‘It hurts,’” Regina remembers. “She was crying in her room. I asked her what was wrong, and she said she didn’t want to tell me.” (To protect the privacy of a juvenile rape survivor, TIME is using pseudonyms to refer to Ashley and Regina; Peanut is the baby’s nickname.)

The signs were obvious only in retrospect. Ashley started feeling sick to her stomach; Regina thought it was related to her diet. At one point, Regina even asked Ashley if she was pregnant, and Ashley said nothing. Regina hadn’t yet explained to her daughter how a baby is made, because she didn’t think Ashley was old enough to understand. “They need to be kids,” Regina says. She doesn’t think Ashley even realized that what happened to her could lead to a pregnancy.

On Jan. 11, Ashley began throwing up so much that Regina took her to the emergency room at Northwest Regional Medical Center in Clarksdale. When her bloodwork came back, the hospital called the police. One nurse came in and asked Ashley, “What have you been doing?” Regina recalls. That’s when they found out Ashley was pregnant. “I broke down,” Regina says.


Dr. Erica Balthrop was the ob-gyn on call that day. Balthrop is an assured, muscular woman with close-cropped cornrows and a tattoo of a feather running down her arm. She ordered an ultrasound, and determined Ashley was 10 or 11 weeks along. “It was surreal for her,” Balthrop recalls. "She just had no clue.” The doctor could not get Ashley to answer any questions, or to speak at all. “She would not open her mouth.” (Balthrop spoke about her patient's medical history with Regina's permission.)

At their second visit, about a week later, Regina tentatively asked Balthrop if there was any way to terminate Ashley’s pregnancy. Seven months earlier, Balthrop could have directed Ashley to abortion clinics in Memphis, 90 minutes north, or in Jackson, Miss., two and a half hours south. But today, Ashley lives in the heart of abortion-ban America. In 2018, Republican lawmakers in Mississippi [url=https://time.com/6116072/mississippi-abortion-supreme-court-jackson-womens-health/]enacted a ban
 on most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy. The law was blocked by a federal judge, who ruled that it violated the abortion protections guaranteed by Roe v. Wade. The Supreme Court felt differently. In their June 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to abortion that had existed for nearly half a century. Within weeks, Mississippi and every state that borders it banned abortion in almost all circumstances.

Balthrop told Regina that the closest abortion provider for Ashley would be in Chicago. At first, Regina thought she and Ashley could drive there. But it’s a nine-hour trip, and Regina would have to take off work. She’d have to pay for gas, food, and a place to stay for a couple of nights, not to mention the cost of the abortion itself. “I don’t have the funds for all this,” she says.

So Ashley did what girls with no other options do: she did nothing.






Clarksdale is in the Mississippi Delta, a vast stretch of flat, fertile land in the northwest corner of the state, between the Mississippi and Yazoo rivers. The people who live in the Delta are overwhelmingly Black. The poverty rate is high. The region is an epicenter of America’s ongoing Black maternal-health crisis. Mississippi has the second-highest maternal-mortality rate in the country, with 43 deaths per 100,00 live births, and the Delta has among the worst maternal-healthcare outcomes in the state. Black women in Mississippi are four times as likely to die from pregnancy-related complications as white women.

Mississippi’s abortion ban is expected to result in thousands of additional births, often to low-income, high-risk mothers. Dr. Daniel Edney, Mississippi’s top health official, tells TIME his department is “actively preparing” for roughly 4,000 additional live births this year alone. Edney says improving maternal-health outcomes is the “No. 1 priority” for the Mississippi health department, which has invested $2 million into its Healthy Moms, Healthy Babies program to provide extra support for new mothers. “There is a sense of following through, and not just as a predominantly pro-life state,” says Edney. “We don’t just care about life in utero. We care about life, period, and that includes the mother’s life and the baby’s life.”
[Image: Abortion-Clarksdale-map-1.jpg?quality=85&w=550]



Lon Tweeten for TIME

Mississippi’s abortion ban contains narrow exceptions, including for rape victims and to save the life of the mother. As Ashley's case shows, these exceptions are largely theoretical. Even if a victim files a police report, there appears to be no clear process for granting an exception. (The state Attorney General’s office did not return TIME’s repeated requests to clarify the process for granting exceptions; the Mississippi Board of Medical Licensure and the Mississippi State Medical Association did not reply to TIME’s requests for explanation.) And, of course, there are no abortion providers left in the state. In January, the New York Times reported that since Mississippi's abortion law went into effect, only two exceptions had been made. Even if the process for obtaining one were clear, it wouldn’t have helped Ashley. Regina didn’t know that Mississippi’s abortion ban had an exception for rape.

Even before Dobbs, it was perilous to become a mother in rural Mississippi. More than half the counties in the state can be classified as maternity-care deserts, according to a 2023 report from the March of Dimes, meaning there are no birthing facilities or obstetric providers. More than 24% of women in Mississippi have no birthing hospital within a 30-minute drive, compared to the national average of roughly 10%. According to Edney, there are just nine ob-gyns serving a region larger than the state of Delaware. Every time another ob-gyn retires, Balthrop gets an influx of new patients. “These patients are having to drive further to get the same care, then they're having to wait longer,” Balthrop says.


Read More: The Future of Abortion Access After Roe v. Wade.


Those backups can have cascading effects. Balthrop recalls one woman who had to wait four weeks to get an appointment. "That’s unacceptable, because you don't know if she’s high risk or not until she sees you," the doctor says says. Her patient "didn’t know she was pregnant. Now the time has lapsed so much that she can’t drive anyplace to terminate even if she chose to."

Early data suggests the Dobbs decision will make this problem worse. Younger doctors and medical students say they don't want to move to states with abortion restrictions. When Emory University researcher Ariana Traub surveyed almost 500 third- and fourth-year medical students in 2022, close to 80% said that abortion laws influenced where they planned to apply to residency. Nearly 60% said they were unlikely to apply to any residency programs in states with abortion restrictions. Traub had assumed that abortion would be most important to students studying obstetrics, but was surprised to find that three-quarters of students across all medical specialties said that Dobbs was affecting their residency decisions.

“People often forget that doctors are people and patients too,” Traub says. “And residency is often the time when people are in their mid-30s and thinking of starting a family.” Traub found that medical students weren’t just reluctant to practice in states with abortion bans. They didn’t want to become pregnant there, either.


And so Dobbs has compounded America's maternal-health crisis: more women are delivering more babies, in areas where there are already not enough doctors to care for them, while abortion bans are making it more difficult to recruit qualified providers to the regions that need them most. “People always ask me: ‘Why do you choose to stay there?’” says Balthrop, who has worked in the Delta for more than 20 years. “I feel like I have no choice at this point."





[Image: mississippi-delta-womens-health-abortion...=85&w=2400]



Ashley, pictured two days after Peanut was born. 
Lucy Garrett for TIME

The weeks went on, and Ashley entered her second trimester. She wore bigger clothes to hide her bump, until she was so big that Regina took her out of school. They told everyone Ashley needed surgery for a bad ulcer. “We’ve been keeping it quiet, because people judge wrong when they don’t know what’s going on,” Regina says. She’s been trying to keep Ashley away from “nosy people.” For months, Ashley spent most of the day alone, finishing up sixth grade on her laptop. The family still has no plans to tell anybody about the pregnancy. “It’s going to be a little private matter here,” Regina says.

Ashley has ADHD and trouble focusing, and has an Individualized Education Program at school. She had never talked much, but after the rape she went from shy to almost mute. Regina thinks she may have been too traumatized to speak. At first, Regina couldn’t even get Ashley to tell her about the rape at all.


In an interview in a side bedroom, while Ashley watched TV with Peanut in another room, Regina recounted the details of her daughter’s sexual assault, as she understands them. It was a weekend in the fall, shortly after lunchtime, and Ashley, then 12, had been outside their home making TikToks while her uncle and sibling were inside. A man came down the street and into the front yard, grabbed Ashley, and covered her mouth, Regina says. He pulled her around to the side of the house and raped her. Ashley told Regina that her assailant was an adult, and that she didn’t know him. Nobody else witnessed the assault.


Shortly after finding out Ashley was pregnant, Regina filed a complaint with the Clarksdale Police Department. The department's assistant chief of police, Vincent Ramirez, confirmed to TIME that a police report had been filed in the matter, but refused to share the document because it involved a minor.
[Image: mississippi-delta-womens-health-police-d...=85&w=2400]



Experts say the Clarksdale Police Department's decision to wait until after Ashley delivered to collect DNA evidence is not unusual.
 
Lucy Garrett for TIME

Regina says that another family member believed they had identified the rapist through social-media sleuthing. The family says they flagged the man they suspected to the police, but the investigation seemed to go nowhere. Ramirez declined to comment on an ongoing investigation, but an investigator in the department confirmed to TIME that an arrest has not yet been made. With their investigation still incomplete, police have not yet publicly confirmed that they believe Ashley’s pregnancy resulted from sexual assault.

Regina felt the police weren’t taking the case seriously. She says she was told that in order to move the investigation forward, the police needed DNA from the baby after its birth. Experts say this is not unusual. Although it is technically possible to obtain DNA from a fetus, police are often reluctant to initiate an invasive procedure on a pregnant victim, says Phillip Danielson, a professor of forensic genetics at the University of Denver. They typically test DNA only on fetal remains after an abortion, or after a baby is born, he says.


But almost three days after Peanut was born, the police still hadn’t picked up the DNA sample; it was only after inquiries from TIME that officers finally arrived to collect it. Asked at the Clarksdale police station why it had taken so long after Peanut's birth for crucial evidence to be collected, Ramirez shrugged. “It’s a pretty high priority, as a juvenile,” he says. “Sometimes they slip a little bit because we’ve got a lot going on, but then they come back to it.”





[Image: mississippi-delta-womens-health-clinic.j...=85&w=2400]



The Woman's Clinic in Clarksdale, Miss., is a lifeline in a vast region with few other maternity health options.
 
Lucy Garrett for TIME

Ashley doesn’t say much when asked how it felt to learn she was pregnant. Her mouth twists into a shy grimace, and she looks away. “Not good,” she says after a long pause. “Not happy.”

Regina’s own feelings about abortion became more complicated as the pregnancy progressed. She got pregnant with her first daughter at 17, and was a mother at 18. “I was a teen,” says Regina, now 33. “But I wasn’t as young as her.”


Regina had considered abortion during one of her own pregnancies. But her grandmother admonished her, “Your mama didn’t abort you.” Now Regina felt caught between her family’s general disapproval of abortion and the realization that her 13-year-old daughter was pregnant as the result of a rape. “I wish she had just told me when it happened. We could have gotten Plan B or something,” Regina says, referring to the emergency contraceptive often known as the “morning-after pill.” “That would have been that.”


Balthrop often sees this kind of ambivalence. Clarksdale is in the heart of the Bible Belt, and many of her patients are Black women from religious families. Even if they want to terminate their pregnancies, Balthrop says, many of them ultimately decide not to go through with it. Since the Dobbs decision, however, Balthrop has seen an increase in “incomplete abortions,” which is when the pregnancy has been terminated but the uterus hasn’t been fully emptied. Medication abortions— abortions managed with pills, which are increasingly available online—are overwhelmingly safe, but occasionally can have minor complications when the pills are not taken exactly as directed. “They're having complications after—not serious, but they'll come in with significant bleeding, and then we still have to finish the process,” Balthrop says, explaining that they sometimes have to evacuate dead fetal tissue.

According to Balthrop, Ashley didn’t have complications during her pregnancy. But she didn’t start speaking more until she felt the baby move, around her sixth month. “That’s when it hit home,” Balthrop says. “She’d complain about little aches and pains that she had never had before. That’s when her mom would come in and say, ‘She asked me this question,’ and the three of us would sit and talk about it.”
How did Ashley feel in anticipation of becoming a mother? “Nervous,” is all she will say. Toward the end of the pregnancy, she was terrified of going into labor, Balthrop recalls. Most of her questions were about pushing, and delivery, and how painful it would be. She was focused on “the delivery process itself,” Balthrop says. “Not, ‘What am I going to do when I take this baby home?’”





The Clarksdale Woman’s Clinic, where Balthrop practices, is across the street from the emergency room at Northwest Regional Medical Center, where Ashley first learned she was pregnant. The clinic is large and welcoming, with comfortable chairs and paintings of flowers on the walls. The staff is kind and efficient, the space is clean, and it helps that the three ob-gyns on staff are Black, since most of the patients are Black women. The clinic’s strong reputation attracts patients from an hour away in all directions. It is a lifeline in a vast region with few other maternity health options.

Even for healthy patients, it can be dangerous to be pregnant in such a rural area. “We have patients who walk to our clinic. They don't have transportation,” says Casey Shoun, an administrative assistant at Clarksdale Woman’s. Some can get Medicaid transportation, but it’s notoriously unreliable. The trip can be hard even for local residents: the roads leading to the clinic don’t have good sidewalks, and temperatures in the Delta regularly reach 100 degrees in the summer.


Shoun says the clinic gets patients who are six months pregnant by the time they have their first prenatal appointment. “We've had patients who go to the hospital, and they've already delivered,” Shoun says. Balthrop recalls one woman who went into labor about seven weeks early, and had to drive 45 minutes to get to the hospital. She was too late. “By the time she got here, the baby had passed already,” Balthrop says.

Clarksdale Woman's is equipped to handle routine appointments for a healthy pregnancy like Ashley’s. But a pregnant woman with any complication at all—from deep-vein thrombosis to diabetes, preeclampsia to advanced maternal age—will have to make a three-hour round trip drive to Memphis to see the closest maternal-fetal-medicine specialist. The most vulnerable patients are often the ones who have to travel the farthest for pregnancy care.


Read More: Inside Mississippi's Last Abortion Clinic.

One morning in August, as the clinic filled, Balthrop allowed TIME to interview consenting patients in the waiting room and parking lot. One of them was Mikashia Hardiman, who is 18 years old and pregnant with her first child. Hardiman had just had her 20-week anatomy scan, and learned that she has a shortened cervix, which means her mother now has to drive her to Memphis to see a specialist.
Jessica Ray, 36, was 13 weeks pregnant with her third child. Three years ago, when she suddenly went into labor with her second child at 33 weeks, she drove herself 45 minutes to the hospital and delivered less than half an hour after she arrived. Ray knows the travel ordeals ahead of her: because she had preeclampsia with her first two pregnancies, she’ll have to go see the specialist in Memphis each month. “You have to take off work and make sure somebody's getting your kids,” Ray says.

Balthrop, who has three kids of her own, has long considered moving to a different region with a better education system. "I feel like I can’t," she says. "I would be letting so many people down."


But the clinic is under serious financial strain. Between overhead, malpractice insurance, the increasing costs of goods and services, and decreasing insurance reimbursements, Balthrop and her colleagues can barely afford to keep Clarksdale Woman's open. They’re considering selling the practice to a hospital 30 miles away. If that happened, Balthrop says, babies would no longer be delivered in Clarksdale, a city of less than 15,000. Some of her patients would have to leave the Delta—possibly driving an hour or more—to get even the most basic maternity care.

For the patients who already struggle to make it to Clarksdale, that would spell disaster. "They just wouldn't get care until they show up for delivery at the hospital,” says Shoun, the administrative assistant. “Imagine if we weren't here. Where would they go?"





[Image: mississippi-delta-womens-health-rural.jp...=85&w=2400]



Clarksdale is in the heart of the Bible Belt.
 
Lucy Garrett for TIME

Ashley started feeling contractions on a Saturday afternoon when she was 39 weeks pregnant. She called Regina, who came home from work, and together they started timing them. They arrived at the hospital around 8 p.m. that night. An exam revealed Ashley was already six centimeters dilated. Her water broke soon after, and she got an epidural. She delivered Peanut within five hours. Ashley describes the birth in one word: “Painful.”

For Regina, the arrival of her first grandchild has not eased the pain of watching what her daughter has endured. “This situation hurts the most because it was an innocent child doing what children do, playing outside, and it was my child,” Regina says. “It still hurts, and is going to always hurt.”



Ashley doesn’t know anybody else who has a baby. She doesn’t want her three friends at school to find out that she has one now. Regina is working on an arrangement with the school so Ashley can start seventh grade from home until she’s ready to go back in person. Relatives will watch Peanut while Regina is at work. Is there anything about motherhood that Ashley is excited about? She twists her mouth, shrugs, and says nothing. Is there anything Ashley wants to say to other girls? “Be careful when you go outside,” she says. “And stay safe.”


There is only one moment when Ashley smiles a little, and it’s when she describes the nurses she met in the doctors’ office and delivery room. One of them, she remembers, was “nice” and “cool.” She has decided that when she grows up, she wants to be a nurse too. “To help people,” she says. For a second, she looks like any other soon-to-be seventh grader sharing her childhood dream. Then Peanut stirs in his car seat. Regina says he needs to be fed. Ashley’s face goes blank again. She is a mother now.

The "Bible Belt".  


RE: Roe Vs Wade Overturned - BigPapaKain - 08-16-2023

(08-16-2023, 09:12 PM)GMDino Wrote: So sad...and so unneeded.  It disgusts me.    Whatever

https://time.com/6303701/a-rape-in-mississippi/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=editorial&utm_term=u.s._abortion&linkId=229820205



The "Bible Belt".  

I mean we know they only give a shit about children who don't exist yet. This is just another confirmation.


RE: Roe Vs Wade Overturned - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 08-16-2023

(08-16-2023, 09:34 PM)BigPapaKain Wrote: I mean we know they only give a shit about children who don't exist yet. This is just another confirmation.

Of course the flip side of that coin being that the left claims to care about children while murdering millions of them.  It's almost like this is an issue they want us squabbling about while they rob us blind.


RE: Roe Vs Wade Overturned - BigPapaKain - 08-17-2023

(08-16-2023, 10:24 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Of course the flip side of that coin being that the left claims to care about children while murdering millions of them.  It's almost like this is an issue they want us squabbling about while they rob us blind.

I'm not sure I've seen any reports of the left murdering any children. Unless of course you mean abortions, because I bet you can guess what color the states are that typically have the most (just in case, I'll drop a hint - it's not the ones where the push things like abstinence only birth control).

Which of course opens up a whole other discussion about what constitutes a child. Personally, I don't consider a child until it's viable outside the womb (which most people agree is beyond the point of abortion anyways). Some of the more - eh - sycophantic members of society were pushing that it's a child the night of conception (and not necessarily even after the act).


RE: Roe Vs Wade Overturned - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 08-17-2023

(08-17-2023, 06:40 AM)BigPapaKain Wrote: I'm not sure I've seen any reports of the left murdering any children. Unless of course you mean abortions, because I bet you can guess what color the states are that typically have the most (just in case, I'll drop a hint - it's not the ones where the push things like abstinence only birth control).

Of course I meant abortions.  I don't even believe that personally, but there are millions who sincerely hold that belief.


Quote:Which of course opens up a whole other discussion about what constitutes a child. Personally, I don't consider a child until it's viable outside the womb (which most people agree is beyond the point of abortion anyways).

I would tend to agree with that.  Sadly, there are some on the far left that are ok with an elective abortion up to the point of delivery.  You'll get the talking point answer, "that's between a woman and her doctor".  Actually, you might get "birthing person" instead of woman in that sentence.

Quote:Some of the more - eh - sycophantic members of society were pushing that it's a child the night of conception (and not necessarily even after the act).

Indeed.  Just as there are those, as mentioned above, who have no issue with abortions late into the third trimester.


RE: Roe Vs Wade Overturned - BigPapaKain - 08-17-2023

(08-17-2023, 11:01 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Of course I meant abortions.  I don't even believe that personally, but there are millions who sincerely hold that belief.

Yeah well millions of people think eating a cow is murder, too. I don't give them any more attention than the folks who think that all abortion are murder (unless it's them/their daughter/mistress/niece/labradoodle).

Quote:I would tend to agree with that.  Sadly, there are some on the far left that are ok with an elective abortion up to the point of delivery.  You'll get the talking point answer, "that's between a woman and her doctor".  Actually, you might get "birthing person" instead of woman in that sentence.

I realize I'm probably wrong is saying this, but I'm pressing X to doubt that anyone is okay with abortions up to delivery (outside of the scope of a stillborn birth). I don't care if they say woman or birthing person, however. I've got a buddy who changes his name every 3-4 years, so people's choices on adjectives really mean nothing to me at the end of the day.

Quote:Indeed.  Just as there are those, as mentioned above, who have no issue with abortions late into the third trimester.

I mean I'm fine with it, too. If it's done to literally save the life of the mother. Aside from that - nah, fam. 


RE: Roe Vs Wade Overturned - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 08-18-2023

(08-17-2023, 12:40 PM)BigPapaKain Wrote: Yeah well millions of people think eating a cow is murder, too. I don't give them any more attention than the folks who think that all abortion are murder (unless it's them/their daughter/mistress/niece/labradoodle).

That's a rather facile analogy.  Let me ask you this, a man murders a woman who is 8 months pregnant.  Do you really think he didn't take two lives with his actions?



Quote:I realize I'm probably wrong is saying this, but I'm pressing X to doubt that anyone is okay with abortions up to delivery (outside of the scope of a stillborn birth). I don't care if they say woman or birthing person, however. I've got a buddy who changes his name every 3-4 years, so people's choices on adjectives really mean nothing to me at the end of the day.

Sadly, it's not.  I listen to Senate and House hearings in the background at work.  The standard abortion tactic from the GOP is to ask the person appearing before the committee whether they support elective abortion in the last trimester.  The response they get, every single time, is that's a discussion to be had between a woman and her doctor/medical professional.  Of course, it's a clear dodge, as for ideologues they cannot allow any crack in the armor.  If you won't say you oppose elective abortion in the last trimester then you are saying you support it.

Quote:I mean I'm fine with it, too. If it's done to literally save the life of the mother. Aside from that - nah, fam. 

We feel the same way.  Sadly, there are some, on both extremes, who don't.  Albeit in differing ways.


RE: Roe Vs Wade Overturned - BigPapaKain - 08-18-2023

(08-18-2023, 12:33 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: That's a rather facile analogy.  Let me ask you this, a man murders a woman who is 8 months pregnant.  Do you really think he didn't take two lives with his actions?

Simply put - you're asking me when I believe life begins. To which I answer - I don't have a strong enough opinion on it. Scientifically, one could make the argument that life begins when the fetus is viable outside the womb, but in that scenario the fetus is going to die without round the clock medical care, so is it truly viable? Judaism teaches that life begins when first breath is taken - which doesn't necessarily mean after a full term birth. Satanism doesn't really have a stance on when life begins, so I'll default to that (since I'm a Satanist and its honestly the cleanest answer I can give).

Quote:Sadly, it's not.  I listen to Senate and House hearings in the background at work.  The standard abortion tactic from the GOP is to ask the person appearing before the committee whether they support elective abortion in the last trimester.  The response they get, every single time, is that's a discussion to be had between a woman and her doctor/medical professional.  Of course, it's a clear dodge, as for ideologues they cannot allow any crack in the armor.  If you won't say you oppose elective abortion in the last trimester then you are saying you support it.

I mean sure it's a dodge but it's also the correct answer. I don't know when it happened, but everyone suddenly being obsessed with everyone else's business is probably one of the biggest problems in this country. I don't necessarily have to agree with an abortion in the third trimester, but at the end of the day it's also not my problem. I can't carry a child. My wife can't carry a child. I'd rather if someone got an abortion it's done in a clean and safe environment with proper staff and equipment than a dark, dirty alley performed by Chuck No-Teeth and his handy dandy pry-bar and karate kick technique, so I understand the fight for elective abortions - people who want them are going to get them; might as well not kill two birds.


Quote:We feel the same way.  Sadly, there are some, on both extremes, who don't.  Albeit in differing ways.


People will feel how they do. I imagine most folk have similar feelings on the subject as we do; it's just the loud ones who get heard.


RE: Roe Vs Wade Overturned - Dill - 08-19-2023

(08-17-2023, 12:40 PM)BigPapaKain Wrote: Yeah well millions of people think eating a cow is murder, too. I don't give them any more attention than the folks who think that all abortion are murder (unless it's them/their daughter/mistress/niece/labradoodle).

Problem is, millions of those people who think abortion is murder don't live in India.

They live, and vote, here. 

When their minority position becomes the law, we have to pay attention.


RE: Roe Vs Wade Overturned - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 08-19-2023

(08-18-2023, 04:09 PM)BigPapaKain Wrote: Simply put - you're asking me when I believe life begins. To which I answer - I don't have a strong enough opinion on it. Scientifically, one could make the argument that life begins when the fetus is viable outside the womb, but in that scenario the fetus is going to die without round the clock medical care, so is it truly viable? Judaism teaches that life begins when first breath is taken - which doesn't necessarily mean after a full term birth. Satanism doesn't really have a stance on when life begins, so I'll default to that (since I'm a Satanist and its honestly the cleanest answer I can give).

The problem is, plenty of people do have a strong opinion, on both sides of the issue.  You not caring doesn't prevent it from being an issue.



Quote:I mean sure it's a dodge but it's also the correct answer. I don't know when it happened, but everyone suddenly being obsessed with everyone else's business is probably one of the biggest problems in this country. I don't necessarily have to agree with an abortion in the third trimester, but at the end of the day it's also not my problem. I can't carry a child. My wife can't carry a child. I'd rather if someone got an abortion it's done in a clean and safe environment with proper staff and equipment than a dark, dirty alley performed by Chuck No-Teeth and his handy dandy pry-bar and karate kick technique, so I understand the fight for elective abortions - people who want them are going to get them; might as well not kill two birds.

Let's say there was a building a block away from your home.  Children of toddler age are brought there on a daily basis and killed.  Would you just drive past that building on a daily basis and think to yourself it's not your problem?



Quote:People will feel how they do. I imagine most folk have similar feelings on the subject as we do; it's just the loud ones who get heard.

Which is pretty much true about every issue.  At the end of the day finding a good compromise would turn down the volume, or at least lesson the number of people shouting about it.


RE: Roe Vs Wade Overturned - basballguy - 08-19-2023

(08-19-2023, 04:15 AM)Dill Wrote: Problem is, millions of those people who think abortion is murder don't live in India.

They live, and vote, here. 

When their minority position becomes the law, we have to pay attention.

What minority position recently became law that you're paying attention to?  


RE: Roe Vs Wade Overturned - Dill - 08-19-2023

(08-19-2023, 11:40 AM)basballguy Wrote: What minority position recently became law that you're paying attention to?  

I'm referring to Dobbs vs Jackson, the overturning of Roe vs Wade, although a majority of Americans are pro-choice.
https://www.npr.org/2022/06/24/1102305878/supreme-court-abortion-roe-v-wade-decision-overturn

As of last year, only 39% of Americans were "pro-life," as they term themselves. 
https://www.npr.org/2022/06/24/1102305878/supreme-court-abortion-roe-v-wade-decision-overturn

But the GOP super-minority control of the Supreme Court removed abortion as a Federal "right" and turned it back to the states, allowing 
GOP controlled state legislatures more "Freedom"; so they banned it in their states and then set to work developing laws
which could extend their control over citizen's behavior outside the state. 
(Dino's post above has a map demarcating their progress.)

BigP said he could ignore pro-lifers' beliefs. My point was that people cannot in those states where they now control
the legislature and state law, and to some degree in other states, where those help with surveillance of possible "offenders"
who leave red states for blue to get abortions.


RE: Roe Vs Wade Overturned - Dill - 08-19-2023

About judge James Ho's innovative legal argument, linking abortion harm to the "aesthetic injury" doctors experience when the lives of their unborn patients are terminated--

Ho Cites Doctor ‘Aesthetic’ Injuries in Abortion Pill Case
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/health-law-and-business/judge-ho-cites-doctor-aesthetic-injuries-in-abortion-pill-case

Federal appeals court Judge James Ho invoked an unusual parallel to injuries claimed by environmentalists and animal lovers to justify why anti-abortion groups could challenge a key abortion drug.

In an opinion dissenting in part from the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s decision to keep mifepristone on the market but with tighter restrictions, Ho argued doctors suffer an “aesthetic injury” when their “unborn patients” are aborted.

The environmental cases he referenced gave people standing to bring challenges to things like construction projects and expanded hunting rights because they would prevent someone from being able to observe animals in the wild or enjoy the outdoors.

“I absolutely get and agree with the idea that there is something degrading about treating women as, you know, akin to kind of the natural splendor of a sunset,” David Schraub, an constitutional law professor at Lewis & Clark Law School, said noting the criticism Ho’s argument has gotten on social media.

Ho agreed with the majority that the doctors suffer other injuries when they have to treat patients who suffer from medical complications after taking mifepristone, including a violation of their rights of conscience and having to divert time and resources from their medical practices. But he wrote separately to argue that the harms of mifepristone go beyond that.

“Unborn babies are a source of profound joy for those who view them,” he wrote. “Expectant parents eagerly share ultrasound photos with loved ones. Friends and family cheer at the sight of an unborn child. “Doctors delight in working with their unborn patients—and experience an aesthetic injury when they are aborted.”. . .


Boston University School of Law professor Aziza Ahmed said that part of Ho’s dissent was “a bit offensive.”
“Even if you want to say there is an unborn child and that child is suffering, two people are suffering in that scenario,” she said.
Ahmed, who’s an expert in health law and reproductive rights and justice, argues Ho’s dissent erases women from that scenario.
“You can read the sentence ‘Unborn babies are a source of joy,’” she said. “What about the women? Where do they go in that sentence?”
Ho, who was nominated to the appeals court by President Donald Trump in 2017, is known for using provocative rhetoric in opinions in cases that center on hot button social issues.

In a 2021 opinion he suggested his colleagues were applying “a woke Constitution” when they dissented from the full court’s refusal to rehear a case challenging an earlier decision to grant qualified immunity to two police officers who had been accused of tasing a man to death.

“Some argue the police should not use force, even in cases involving deadly threats—or that we should defund the police altogether,” Ho wrote. “But that is a policy debate for the political branches, not the judiciary. As judges, we apply our written Constitution, not a woke Constitution.”

Ho, a former clerk to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, has been equally outspoken off the bench. He threatened to refuse to hire law students at Stanford and Yale as clerks due to how protestors on those campuses treated conservative speakers.

Schraub said Ho is “a standard-bearer for a new generation of conservative jurists” who recognize and believe in the judiciary as a vanguard for right-wing social change. This generation, he said, isn’t afraid to attack in bold language anyone who’s advocating for a more constrained, traditional view of the judicial role....

“Since Dobbs, I think, the acceptable discourse of how one speaks about the medical regulation of abortion has basically transformed dramatically,” she said. “His use of the word ‘unborn’ child, his centering on the physician experiencing an injury as opposed to the woman experiencing an injury. You can see all the shifts occurring in this dissent.”



RE: Roe Vs Wade Overturned - samhain - 08-19-2023

(08-18-2023, 12:33 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: That's a rather facile analogy.  Let me ask you this, a man murders a woman who is 8 months pregnant.  Do you really think he didn't take two lives with his actions?




Sadly, it's not.  I listen to Senate and House hearings in the background at work.  The standard abortion tactic from the GOP is to ask the person appearing before the committee whether they support elective abortion in the last trimester.  The response they get, every single time, is that's a discussion to be had between a woman and her doctor/medical professional.  Of course, it's a clear dodge, as for ideologues they cannot allow any crack in the armor.  If you won't say you oppose elective abortion in the last trimester then you are saying you support it.


We feel the same way.  Sadly, there are some, on both extremes, who don't.  Albeit in differing ways.

I'd be pretty okay with legislation that meets in the middle.  No third trimester other than saving the life of the mother or product of rape/incest.  

Rhetoric will never let that kind of outcome exist.  


RE: Roe Vs Wade Overturned - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 08-19-2023

(08-19-2023, 04:51 PM)Dill Wrote: I'm referring to Dobbs vs Jackson, the overturning of Roe vs Wade, although a majority of Americans are pro-choice.
https://www.npr.org/2022/06/24/1102305878/supreme-court-abortion-roe-v-wade-decision-overturn


But the GOP super-minority control of the Supreme Court removed abortion as a Federal "right" and turned it back to the states, allowing 
GOP controlled state legislatures more "Freedom"; so they banned it in their states and then set to work developing laws
which could extend their control over citizen's behavior outside the state. 
(Dino's post above has a map demarcating their progress.)

Popular support for something does not qualify it as being a constitutional right.  It would be far more accurate to say the the Roe decision imposed a law on others.  Even pro-choice people like myself can see the validity of the argument in Dobbs, and recognize that Roe was far more a case of judicial activism than the Dobbs decision.