Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise
Pats v Eagles Game - Printable Version

+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Cincinnati-Bengals-NFL)
+--- Forum: Around the NFL (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Around-the-NFL)
+--- Thread: Pats v Eagles Game (/Thread-Pats-v-Eagles-Game)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7


RE: Pats v Eagles Game - StLucieBengal - 12-06-2015

Woot woot Philly


RE: Pats v Eagles Game - 6andcounting - 12-06-2015

This shitty Eagles team could be tied for 1st depending on the redskins? lol


RE: Pats v Eagles Game - Awful Llama - 12-06-2015

Oh, thank God. Whew, that was close.


RE: Pats v Eagles Game - reuben.ahmed - 12-06-2015

Carolina losing 34-38.


RE: Pats v Eagles Game - West Union KennyG - 12-06-2015

Tom Brady's contract with the Devil must've just expired.


RE: Pats v Eagles Game - StLucieBengal - 12-06-2015

(12-06-2015, 09:21 PM)Atomic Orange Wrote: Tonight is one of the rare  Sick times i will be Sick rooting Sick for your team  Sick
Are the Eagles really going to blow this!?!  :snark:

Why would you root for them?

Better to bury them as deep as possible with the wild card teams losing today


RE: Pats v Eagles Game - ShowMeUrTDs - 12-06-2015

(12-06-2015, 09:29 PM)jfkbengals Wrote: This is the part you need to be looking at.  I know that it says wild card, but it is the tie breaker used for different divisions.  It probably should be named differently to prevent confusion.  To make it easier I'm using different colors.  Bengals, Patriots tie at 10-2  Bengals, Pats, Broncos tie at 10-2


TO BREAK A TIE FOR THE WILD-CARD TEAM

If it is necessary to break ties to determine the two Wild-Card clubs from each conference, the following steps will be taken.

  1. If the tied clubs are from the same division, apply division tie breaker.
  2. If the tied clubs are from different divisions, apply the following steps.
Two Clubs


  1. Head-to-head, if applicable.N/A
  2. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference.Currently .889 vs .875
  3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, minimum of four.
  4. Strength of victory.
  5. Strength of schedule.
  6. Best combined ranking among conference teams in points scored and points allowed.
  7. Best combined ranking among all teams in points scored and points allowed.
  8. Best net points in conference games.
  9. Best net points in all games.
  10. Best net touchdowns in all games.
  11. Coin toss.
Three or More Clubs

(Note: If two clubs remain tied after third or other clubs are eliminated, tie breaker reverts to step 1 of applicable two-club format.)


  1. Apply division tie breaker to eliminate all but the highest ranked club in each division prior to proceeding to step 2. The original seeding within a division upon application of the division tie breaker remains the same for all subsequent applications of the procedure that are necessary to identify the two Wild-Card participants.N/A
  2. Head-to-head sweep. (Applicable only if one club has defeated each of the others or if one club has lost to each of the others.)N/A
  3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference..889 vs .875 vs .750
  4. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, minimum of four.
  5. Strength of victory.
  6. Strength of schedule.
  7. Best combined ranking among conference teams in points scored and points allowed.
  8. Best combined ranking among all teams in points scored and points allowed.
  9. Best net points in conference games.
  10. Best net points in all games.
  11. Best net touchdowns in all games.
  12. Coin toss

What they need to do is just have a clearer set of rules for conference tiebreaker.....but, either way it looks like the Bengals have both covered better conference percentage and better division record. Eagle just sealed the deal Cincinnati name should have a #1 in front of it for playoff seeding!


RE: Pats v Eagles Game - reuben.ahmed - 12-06-2015

Good game here, Panthers have to score in the redzone.


RE: Pats v Eagles Game - StLucieBengal - 12-06-2015

Wow this game is tit for tat


RE: Pats v Eagles Game - reuben.ahmed - 12-06-2015

Panthers up 41-38, 1 minute left for Brees, no TOs left. This is going to OT. Newton is beast, 5 TD game. I think he's MVP.


RE: Pats v Eagles Game - reuben.ahmed - 12-06-2015

I think brees is going deep here. 4th and 10, has to get into FG range.


RE: Pats v Eagles Game - reuben.ahmed - 12-06-2015

If the dude turned his head earlier it would have been PI, weak WR.


RE: Pats v Eagles Game - Atomic Orange - 12-06-2015

(12-06-2015, 09:36 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Why would you root for them?  

Better to bury them as deep as possible with the wild card teams losing today

Because for some reason I thought they were playing the Broncos. Again, I have a migraine so i'm blaming it on that.


RE: Pats v Eagles Game - packerbacker - 12-06-2015

I hope Dalton can lead this team this year. The time is now!


RE: Pats v Eagles Game - StLucieBengal - 12-06-2015

(12-06-2015, 09:50 PM)Atomic Orange Wrote: Because for some reason I thought they were playing the Broncos. Again, I have a migraine so i'm blaming it on that.

Either way.... Your off the hook.   Who Dey

I will take a Pitt loss tonight and next week. Then they save their playoff hopes by beating Denver


RE: Pats v Eagles Game - Froob - 12-06-2015

(12-06-2015, 09:53 PM)packerbacker Wrote: I hope Dalton can lead this team this year. The time is now!

Was that a reference to "One Mic" by Nas?


RE: Pats v Eagles Game - 6andcounting - 12-06-2015

(12-06-2015, 10:04 PM)Froob Wrote: Was that a reference to "One Mic" by Nas?

"You need some soul searching, the time is now"

Jokes on you. The ginger QB will never find a soul.


RE: Pats v Eagles Game - packerbacker - 12-06-2015

Lol yep!


RE: Pats v Eagles Game - XenoMorph - 12-08-2015

(12-06-2015, 10:27 PM)6andcounting Wrote: "You need some soul searching, the time is now"

Jokes on you. The ginger QB will never find a soul.

he doesnt need one to earn a ring