Israel/Hamas War Superthread - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Off Topic Forums (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Off-Topic-Forums) +--- Forum: Politics & Religion 2.0 (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Politics-Religion-2-0) +--- Thread: Israel/Hamas War Superthread (/Thread-Israel-Hamas-War-Superthread) |
RE: Israel/Hamas War Superthread - samhain - 02-18-2024 (02-17-2024, 10:56 PM)Matt_Crimson Wrote: Never thought I'd be in a thread against Sociopathissteelerfan, Belsnickel and Dil. A monumental task indeed. Fine example of detached gamer dork armchair geopolitics. Kill em all just like in call of duty. Easy judgement to make in the 20 minutes a day that you actually step out from behind your console. It's fun living in world where little kids are getting blown to bits as a dude half a world away with a cartoon character avatar spends his weekend telling everyone how awesome he thinks it is. RE: Israel/Hamas War Superthread - Matt_Crimson - 02-18-2024 (02-18-2024, 10:40 AM)samhain Wrote: Fine example of detached gamer dork armchair geopolitics. Kill em all just like in call of duty. Easy judgement to make in the 20 minutes a day that you actually step out from behind your console. None of that was even remotely close to anything I've said. Please point to me in any sentence I've posted here where I've said any of this was awesome or that everyone should be killed. Your post is a fine example of gross exaggeration with zero substance. How about instead of making a childish attempt at insulting me, you spend the 20 minutes to form an actual argument. Right, I'm the gamer dork when you're the one bringing up call of duty as if it were a compelling rebuttal. RE: Israel/Hamas War Superthread - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 02-18-2024 (02-18-2024, 12:21 PM)Matt_Crimson Wrote: None of that was even remotely close to anything I've said. While I do not agree with your position, you are correct. You never said anything that could lead a reasonable person to conclude this about you. RE: Israel/Hamas War Superthread - Matt_Crimson - 02-18-2024 (02-18-2024, 02:06 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: While I do not agree with your position, you are correct. You never said anything that could lead a reasonable person to conclude this about you. I do respect your intentions to have coherent and thought provoking conversations, even if we don't agree on this particular issue. Same with Dill and Belsnickel, even if we tend to disagree more than we agree. Posters like you guys are the only reason I even bother engaging in discourse on this board anymore. Perhaps I'll look back on what I've argued here later down the road and say this was a bad take. But I'm standing pretty firm on my position here at the moment. And looking to score popularity points by calling me an armchair gamer dork is certainly not going to change my opinion. RE: Israel/Hamas War Superthread - Dill - 02-18-2024 (02-17-2024, 10:56 PM)Matt_Crimson Wrote: I’m not here to play tit for tat Dill, because again, the displacement, the incursions, the blockades, the occupation, the accords, none of that matters in relation to what I am saying. I much appreciate your efforts to clarify your position. It did sound, though, like you did not understand that Palestinians cannot just walk out of the Gaza Strip. They are "contained" there by the Israeli military, and by Egypt on the southern border. Have been for two generations now. I don't find that normal or ok. And you keep insisting that they "choose" to stay, like no one is forcing them to. Or if someone is, it is still THE GAZANS' FAULT, not that of those who have walled them in. Sometimes it seems you are talking about refugees staying in Gaza City; sometimes it seems you are talking about refugees choosing to stay in the Strip itself. I get confused. The bolded is our primary point of disagreement. Were there no Gazan history of Israeli dispossession, massacre occupation, and containment, Hamas would neither exist nor want to destroy Israel. You want to treat the disease without examining the cause. Hamas said "genocide" so that's all anyone should consider. But you did allow a bit of history in a previous post when you invited to readers to empathize with Israelis suffering an occasional crude rocket, rather than with the people they've penned in Gaza whom they actually bomb with smart munitions--people with nowhere to run. So it's clear you are claiming that history should not matter. But you haven't offered any clear argument as to WHY it shouldn't. "But one party said 'genocide'" doesn't seem to be a clear standard for dismissing the conflict's history, all the more so given the actual balance of forces. Second point, this dismissal of history is also a dismissal of everything one needs to know to find a solution which ends the conflict. A sovereign Palestinian state might go a long ways towards that, but it will be much harder now that so many 10s of thousands of Palestinians have been killed. Again. Third point, in a previous post you said "What I am condemning, is the belief people have, to think that just because they call a place home and decide to live under tyranny, knowing that by doing so they are going to become human shields for their tyrants, which allows them to further carry out their tyranny, that they then get to decide how a military responds to attempted genocide." Shouldn't International Humanitarian Law should determine "how a military responds to attempted genocide"? Any military. I have been surprised at how the "But-they-use-human-shields" argument has come to the fore in discussions about this conflict, to justify disproportional military responses and collective punishment. Like "what else can you do when the people you've imprisoned for two generations on territory you control finally hit back hard?" I suspect there is something else you can do. RE: Israel/Hamas War Superthread - Dill - 02-18-2024 (02-17-2024, 10:56 PM)Matt_Crimson Wrote: Yes, they are absolutely deciding to stay. If 1 million people flee an area and you stay there and die, you chose that. You're acting like Israeli soldiers have been commanded to mow down every Palestinian on sight or that there's absolutely no place to go where they can increase their chances of survival. Again, it sounds like you are speaking as if the borders of the Strip are open. Or are you simply referring to Gaza City? Fleeing to Rafah from Gaza City certainly increases one's chances of survival, which are already pretty low. So it would be stupid to stay and those who can flee Gaza City have "chosen" to do so. But they are still contained in the Gaza Strip. How do you flee that? The Egyptians will turn you back. The Israelis will likely shoot you. And now Rafah must be "cleared" as well. Where will the refugees from Gaza City staying with the refugees of Rafah go next? The barriers which contain the population of Gaza Strip are not natural formations like a mountain range or a river too wide to swim. They are wholly human constructions, manned by humans who have, by the way, made a practice of "mowing down" Palestinians who attempt to break out. You keep saying though that people are "choosing" to stay, like there is no force involved. Or if you recognize the force, you still appear to blame the victims, not the people applying the force, who created the barriers around Gaza and maintain them. This is sort of like blaming a battered wife for not leaving her husband--except in this case the doors and windows are locked an boarded to prevent her leaving without permission. If she attempts to kill her husband, you are not interested in her reasons why--the history of the conflict--only that she has declared homicidal intention and acted on it. And you argue that people always have a choice and should fight back against their oppressors, even if all they have is a pitchfork. That is just what Hamas thinks it is doing, defending against genocide. RE: Israel/Hamas War Superthread - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 02-18-2024 (02-17-2024, 10:56 PM)Matt_Crimson Wrote: Never thought I'd be in a thread against Sociopathissteelerfan, Belsnickel and Dil. A monumental task indeed. I missed this statement, and would only add this. Having certain people on the opposite side, or the same side for that matter, can certainly give you pause. But, on its own it should never be evidence that you are wrong. RE: Israel/Hamas War Superthread - GMDino - 02-29-2024 And again... https://www.cbsnews.com/news/israel-gaza-hamas-war-humanitarian-aid-death-toll-over-30000/ Quote:Israel accused of opening fire on Gaza civilians waiting for food as Hamas says war death toll over 30,000 people RE: Israel/Hamas War Superthread - Arturo Bandini - 02-29-2024 25000 women and children killed in Gaza ... A massacre. RE: Israel/Hamas War Superthread - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 02-29-2024 (02-29-2024, 02:29 PM)Arturo Bandini Wrote: 25000 women and children killed in Gaza ... Where are you getting that number? https://www.cbsnews.com/news/israel-gaza-hamas-war-humanitarian-aid-death-toll-over-30000/#:~:text=Families%20destroyed%20as%20Gaza%20death,more%20than%2070%2C400%20others%20injured. According to the enclave's Hamas-run Health Ministry, which does not distinguish between civilian and combatant casualties, as of Thursday at least 30,035 people have been killed in Gaza since the war started, and more than 70,400 others injured. If you take these numbers as truth, which you shouldn't, that would mean of the 30,035 people killed in Gaza 83% of them were woman and children. That seems rather implausible to me. RE: Israel/Hamas War Superthread - Arturo Bandini - 02-29-2024 From the pentagon. RE: Israel/Hamas War Superthread - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 02-29-2024 (02-29-2024, 03:38 PM)Arturo Bandini Wrote: From the pentagon. Incorrect. https://thehill.com/policy/defense/4497867-democrat-grills-austin-on-lack-of-consequences-for-israel-over-gaza-death-toll/ The Pentagon quickly issued a clarification that Austin was “citing an estimate from the Hamas-controlled health ministry that more than 25,000 total Palestinians have been killed in Gaza.” You were citing Hamas. RE: Israel/Hamas War Superthread - XenoMorph - 02-29-2024 Wonder if the exteremist in Gaza would fire on their own people to blame Israel RE: Israel/Hamas War Superthread - GMDino - 02-29-2024 (02-29-2024, 03:59 PM)XenoMorph Wrote: Wonder if the exteremist in Gaza would fire on their own people to blame Israel Maybe. But Israel admits they did it. They just said it was a "violent gathering" and they fired at "those who posed a threat". From the article posted: Quote:The Israel Defense Forces said the casualties were the result of "a violent gathering of Gazan residents" around aid trucks, during which it said dozens of people were "injured as a result of being crushed and trampled." Don't you worry though...the "incident" is under review! RE: Israel/Hamas War Superthread - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 02-29-2024 (02-29-2024, 03:59 PM)XenoMorph Wrote: Wonder if the exteremist in Gaza would fire on their own people to blame Israel We know they like to hide among the civilian population. Shooting at the IDF from inside a crowd of civilians fits snugly into their MO. RE: Israel/Hamas War Superthread - Dill - 03-02-2024 (02-29-2024, 03:59 PM)XenoMorph Wrote: Wonder if the exteremist in Gaza would fire on their own people to blame Israel Wonder if Israelis would fire on hundreds of starving people mobbing food convoys, inducing a stampede, and then claim they were really firing at another group allegedly approaching them in a "threatening" manner? And only AFTER the stampede had begun? RE: Israel/Hamas War Superthread - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 03-02-2024 (03-02-2024, 03:26 PM)Dill Wrote: Wonder if Israelis would fire on hundreds of starving people mobbing food convoys, inducing a stampede, Let's use Occam's Razor. On one side we have a terrorist organization known to butcher, rape and kidnap civilians. They also like to intentionally embed themselves in their own civilian populace to ensure maximum civilian casualties if anyone strikes at them. On the other side we have the professional military of a democratic nation. None of this can be disputed. Using this principle, which scenario is more likely? RE: Israel/Hamas War Superthread - GMDino - 03-02-2024 (03-02-2024, 03:26 PM)Dill Wrote: Wonder if Israelis would fire on hundreds of starving people mobbing food convoys, inducing a stampede, Step one: Establish that the enemy hides among the civilians. It's impossible to tell them apart even when in close combat. Step two: Make is "acceptable" to kill civilians who are just "casualties" in the war. Step three: Deny the events happened as reported because the "enemy" will always lie. A good, Democratic nation would not! Step four: "Review" the incident for however long you think it will take the world to forget about it. Repeat as necessary until you realize you have to kill every man woman and child to "defeat" the enemy and you withdraw. Oh, wait...that was Vietnam. Not sure it applies here. RE: Israel/Hamas War Superthread - Mike M (the other one) - 03-02-2024 (02-18-2024, 06:38 PM)Dill Wrote: Again, it sounds like you are speaking as if the borders of the Strip are open. Or are you simply referring to Gaza City? Fleeing to Rafah from Gaza City certainly increases one's chances of survival, which are already pretty low. So it would be stupid to stay and those who can flee Gaza City have "chosen" to do so. But they are still contained in the Gaza Strip. How do you flee that? The Egyptians will turn you back. The Israelis will likely shoot you. And now Rafah must be "cleared" as well. Where will the refugees from Gaza City staying with the refugees of Rafah go next? Using that history that you so love, show me where it's been wise to attack Israel and have a good outcome? RE: Israel/Hamas War Superthread - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 03-02-2024 (03-02-2024, 06:13 PM)GMDino Wrote: Step one: Establish that the enemy hides among the civilians. It's impossible to tell them apart even when in close combat. War is a messy business, to be sure. Not sure that using an example of a lieutenant losing his shit and committing war crimes as being indicative of the RoE's, or conduct, for an entire conflict is an honest or fair thing to do. Which is why it doesn't surprise at all me that you did it. Also interesting that you believe terrorists over an ally, but to do otherwise would be to go against your buddy, which you've literally never done. |