+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Cincinnati-Bengals-NFL)
+--- Forum: Rival Talk (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Rival-Talk)
+--- Thread: Burfict Actually Fined 3 Times For Sunday (/Thread-Burfict-Actually-Fined-3-Times-For-Sunday)
RE: Burfict Actually Fined 3 Times For Sunday - Luvnit2 - 12-18-2015
(12-18-2015, 11:07 AM)SteelCitySouth Wrote: You're tears are so think, they're like mayonnaise.
Why would I have tears again for stating facts? It is cool, Heath Miller is a filthy dirty player and we have proof. It is obvious Burfict is targeted because he is black. Racist Steelers fans everywhere.
RE: Burfict Actually Fined 3 Times For Sunday - 6andcounting - 12-18-2015
(12-18-2015, 11:12 AM)Luvnit2 Wrote: Why would I have tears again for stating facts? It is cool, Heath Miller is a filthy dirty player and we have proof. It is obvious Burfict is targeted because he is black. Racist Steelers fans everywhere.
Says the guy who thinks all white people look the same.
RE: Burfict Actually Fined 3 Times For Sunday - Luvnit2 - 12-18-2015
(12-18-2015, 11:13 AM)6andcounting Wrote: Says the guy who thinks all white people look the same.
And we found 1 racist with just a little bait.
RE: Burfict Actually Fined 3 Times For Sunday - SteelCitySouth - 12-18-2015
(12-18-2015, 11:12 AM)Luvnit2 Wrote: Why would I have tears again for stating facts? It is cool, Heath Miller is a filthy dirty player and we have proof. It is obvious Burfict is targeted because he is black. Racist Steelers fans everywhere.
Steeler fans have no effect on Burfict's issues with the refs, as well we have no effect on his less than average ability to play the game.
You so salty.
RE: Burfict Actually Fined 3 Times For Sunday - SteelCitySouth - 12-18-2015
(12-18-2015, 11:20 AM)Luvnit2 Wrote: And we found 1 racist with just a little bait.
wut?...I swear you simply toss shit at the wall and hope at some point it all merges into a masterful piece of work, but all you are ever left with is a wall full of shit.
RE: Burfict Actually Fined 3 Times For Sunday - SteelCitySouth - 12-18-2015
I just realized something. My hand resides so firmly on Luvies left (face) cheek that I do believe I may have to pay property taxes to the town he lives in.
RE: Burfict Actually Fined 3 Times For Sunday - Luvnit2 - 12-18-2015
(12-18-2015, 11:23 AM)SteelCitySouth Wrote: wut?...I swear you simply toss shit at the wall and hope at some point it all merges into a masterful piece of work, but all you are ever left with is a wall full of shit.
You sure do take a smack forum too seriously. Who is being salty?
RE: Burfict Actually Fined 3 Times For Sunday - yellowxdiscipline - 12-18-2015
Do you guys feel a little better now?
RE: Burfict Actually Fined 3 Times For Sunday - SteelCitySouth - 12-18-2015
(12-18-2015, 11:49 AM)Luvnit2 Wrote: You sure do take a smack forum too seriously. Who is being salty?
LOL...Asking one to make enough sense to be understood is serious business for Luvie...
RE: Burfict Actually Fined 3 Times For Sunday - SteelCitySouth - 12-18-2015
(12-18-2015, 11:56 AM)yellowxdiscipline Wrote: Do you guys feel a little better now?
About what?
RE: Burfict Actually Fined 3 Times For Sunday - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 12-18-2015
(12-18-2015, 11:23 AM)SteelCitySouth Wrote: wut?...I swear you simply toss shit at the wall and hope at some point it all merges into a masterful piece of work, but all you are ever left with is a wall full of shit.
It's more like he realizes about thirty minutes after he posts that his post is extremely stupid or completely missed the point. Then he tries to pretend he was joking all along and cleverly baiting you.
RE: Burfict Actually Fined 3 Times For Sunday - yellowxdiscipline - 12-18-2015
(12-18-2015, 11:59 AM)SteelCitySouth Wrote: About what?
That he was fined.. Do you feel an vindication?
RE: Burfict Actually Fined 3 Times For Sunday - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 12-18-2015
(12-18-2015, 12:03 PM)yellowxdiscipline Wrote: That he was fined.. Do you feel an vindication?
Do you think Williams actually intends to murder Burfict? Or are you going to still dodge this question?
RE: Burfict Actually Fined 3 Times For Sunday - XenoMorph - 12-18-2015
(12-18-2015, 12:05 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Do you think Williams actually intends to murder Burfict? Or are you going to still dodge this question?
Nah he doesnt have the stones
RE: Burfict Actually Fined 3 Times For Sunday - 6andcounting - 12-18-2015
(12-18-2015, 12:09 PM)XenoMorph Wrote: Nah he doesnt have the stones
What about a brush?
RE: Burfict Actually Fined 3 Times For Sunday - yellowxdiscipline - 12-18-2015
(12-18-2015, 12:05 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Do you think Williams actually intends to murder Burfict? Or are you going to still dodge this question?
I already answered the question.. Twice. But since youre a little slow to catch on, ill do it again.
No I don't think he did intend to, but he still made a threat.
RE: Burfict Actually Fined 3 Times For Sunday - SteelCitySouth - 12-18-2015
(12-18-2015, 12:03 PM)yellowxdiscipline Wrote: That he was fined.. Do you feel an vindication?
You must have me confused with someone else.
RE: Burfict Actually Fined 3 Times For Sunday - Vlad - 12-18-2015
(12-18-2015, 12:11 PM)yellowxdiscipline Wrote: I already answered the question.. Twice. But since youre a little slow to catch on, ill do it again.
No I don't think he did intend to, but he still made a threat.
Oh OK, then that explains it. bengal fans were only offended by someones words.
RE: Burfict Actually Fined 3 Times For Sunday - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 12-18-2015
(12-18-2015, 12:11 PM)yellowxdiscipline Wrote: I already answered the question.. Twice. But since youre a little slow to catch on, ill do it again.
No I don't think he did intend to, but he still made a threat.
So, we all agree that no death threat was made and that Whitlock sounds like an idiot for stating the opposite. Consensus!
RE: Burfict Actually Fined 3 Times For Sunday - Beaker - 12-18-2015
(12-18-2015, 12:34 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: So, we all agree that no death threat was made and that Whitlock sounds like an idiot for stating the opposite. Consensus!
No consensus. You just want to think you won some sort of debate. He made a thinly veiled threat that could easily be interpreted to mean he intended bodily injury, or worse depending on interpretation. So both of you are right, and neither of you are right. Intentional ambiguity is a wonderful thing.