+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Off Topic Forums (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Off-Topic-Forums)
+--- Forum: Politics & Religion 2.0 (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Politics-Religion-2-0)
+---- Forum: P & R Archive (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-P-R-Archive)
+---- Thread: Glaciers are sexist (/Thread-Glaciers-are-sexist)
Glaciers are sexist - Vlad - 03-08-2016
You can't make this stuff up. A $709,000 federal grant to study how glaciers are sexist.
Are forests islamophobic I wonder?
http://dailycaller.com/2016/03/07/feds-paid-709000-to-academic-who-studies-how-glaciers-are-sexist/
RE: Glaciers are sexist - Belsnickel - 03-09-2016
Apparently you can make this stuff up. So, one, the money was not for this study. None of that money was for this study. Two, it's not a study on glaciers being sexist but the sexist undertones of science in general and glaciology specifically.
Reading the article helps.
RE: Glaciers are sexist - GMDino - 03-09-2016
(03-09-2016, 12:21 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: Apparently you can make this stuff up. So, one, the money was not for this study. None of that money was for this study. Two, it's not a study on glaciers being sexist but the sexist undertones of science in general and glaciology specifically.
Reading the article helps.
But where does the outrage come from if you do that?
RE: Glaciers are sexist - fredtoast - 03-09-2016
(03-09-2016, 12:21 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: Apparently you can make this stuff up. So, one, the money was not for this study. None of that money was for this study. Two, it's not a study on glaciers being sexist but the sexist undertones of science in general and glaciology specifically.
Reading the article helps.
(03-09-2016, 08:23 AM)GMDino Wrote: But where does the outrage come from if you do that?
Doesn't matter what we say.
Everyone in the echo chamber agrees with Vlad, and that is all he cares about.