(04-25-2016, 01:56 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Steelers will go...

1. Cincy
2. NE
3. Cincy

(04-25-2016, 03:13 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Why would the Steelers be worried about Cincy?  We won two of three games against you last year.

(04-25-2016, 03:38 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Oh you mean the two games without Andy?   

And the playoff game was won by Buddy Horton.  

(04-25-2016, 03:38 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Oh you mean the two games without Andy?   

And the playoff game was won by Buddy Horton.  

(04-25-2016, 05:01 PM)StrictlyBiz Wrote: AJ McCarron had a higher QB rating and put up more pts per game and averaged more yards per game against Pittsburgh than Dalton. You guys should thank God that Andy was out! 

(04-25-2016, 04:47 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Oh wait, you mean we get to use injuries as an excuse?  Wait here while I dust off the "Ben was out" argument that is roundly rejected around here.  Can you tell us again how the Bengals would have won the SB if Kimo hadn't taken out Carson's knee?  I love that story.

(04-25-2016, 05:18 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Qb injury isn't using the injury excuse.    If you guys lost the rapist I wouldn't be crowing about beating Vick twice.    

It's not your fault your RB is made of glass.  Big question is do you want to extend him to a big deal or just draft a new one given his injury history.   

(04-25-2016, 05:53 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Can you make a chart about which injuries you can use as an excuse and which you can't?  I'm sure there's a scientific process at work here.

(04-25-2016, 06:13 PM)The Real Deal Wrote: http://mweb.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/25544558/deangelo-williams-vontaze-burfict-hit-ruined-steelers-super-bowl-run?linkId=23137430



But, but, but.......

(04-25-2016, 06:48 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Did you think that quote came from me?  Also, your argument has nothing to do with my post.  Lastly, "the better team lost today". 

(04-25-2016, 05:16 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Doesn't matter with Andy we won.   Without him we didn't.   Yes AJM played well enough to win but since the refs had to intervene to help you guys....    

I am confident in AJM and glad he is our backup.   But to make a huge deal about beating a backup qb two times doesn't say much.   I wouldn't be crowing about beating Vick.    Lord knows you guys need the rapist 

(04-25-2016, 05:18 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Qb injury isn't using the injury excuse.    If you guys lost the rapist I wouldn't be crowing about beating Vick twice.    

It's not your fault your RB is made of glass.  Big question is do you want to extend him to a big deal or just draft a new one given his injury history.   

(04-25-2016, 07:55 PM)StrictlyBiz Wrote: A back up QB who outplayed the starting QB. 
Offers up injury excuse, then says it isn't an excuse 

(04-25-2016, 05:16 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Doesn't matter with Andy we won.   Without him we didn't.   Yes AJM played well enough to win but since the refs had to intervene to help you guys....    

I am confident in AJM and glad he is our backup.   But to make a huge deal about beating a backup qb two times doesn't say much.   I wouldn't be crowing about beating Vick.    Lord knows you guys need the rapist 

(04-25-2016, 03:13 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Why would the Steelers be worried about Cincy?  We won two of three games against you last year.

(04-25-2016, 05:16 PM)StLucieBengal Wrote: Doesn't matter with Andy we won.   Without him we didn't.   Yes AJM played well enough to win but since the refs had to intervene to help you guys....    

I am confident in AJM and glad he is our backup.   But to make a huge deal about beating a backup qb two times doesn't say much.   I wouldn't be crowing about beating Vick.    Lord knows you guys need the rapist 

(04-25-2016, 03:13 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Why would the Steelers be worried about Cincy?  We won two of three games against you last year.