White supremacist for Trump targets independent in Utah call - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Off Topic Forums (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Off-Topic-Forums) +--- Forum: Politics & Religion 2.0 (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Politics-Religion-2-0) +---- Forum: P & R Archive (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-P-R-Archive) +---- Thread: White supremacist for Trump targets independent in Utah call (/Thread-White-supremacist-for-Trump-targets-independent-in-Utah-call) |
White supremacist for Trump targets independent in Utah call - GMDino - 11-01-2016 http://www.newsnet5.com/news/national/white-supremacist-for-trump-targets-independent-in-utah-call Quote:An independent presidential candidate Evan McMullin criticized Republican Donald Trump on Monday over an automated call in Utah from a white nationalist supporter who calls McMullin a "closet homosexual" and "open-borders amnesty supporter." RE: White supremacist for Trump targets independent in Utah call - NATI BENGALS - 11-01-2016 Its good there are more minorities than white supremacists. Crazy shit to have to deal with one calling your house. RE: White supremacist for Trump targets independent in Utah call - bfine32 - 11-01-2016 I hate that the GOP establishment did not get behind McMullin. As to the OP: Was the message approved by the Trump campaign? RE: White supremacist for Trump targets independent in Utah call - fredtoast - 11-02-2016 (11-01-2016, 11:31 PM)bfine32 Wrote: As to the OP: Was the message approved by the Trump campaign? He clearly does not disapprove of the calls. Since Trump has said nothing complaining about the comments in these calls or denouncing the support of white supremacist I have to assume he approves of them. RE: White supremacist for Trump targets independent in Utah call - NATI BENGALS - 11-02-2016 (11-02-2016, 02:11 AM)fredtoast Wrote: He clearly does not disapprove of the calls. Come on man. Just like earlier in the election process when he had to do some research before disavowing groups like the kkk. Give the man some time. He is running for president he needs people to advise him on these issues he is clueless about. Much research is needed to determine whether or not support from white nationalists slamming an opponent is ok. RE: White supremacist for Trump targets independent in Utah call - fredtoast - 11-02-2016 (11-02-2016, 03:07 AM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: Come on man. Just like earlier in the election process when he had to do some research before disavowing groups like the kkk. Give the man some time. He is running for president he needs people to advise him on these issues he is clueless about. Much research is needed to determine whether or not support from white nationalists slamming an opponent is ok. And the way he "forget" who David Duke was when he had known him for years? RE: White supremacist for Trump targets independent in Utah call - bfine32 - 11-02-2016 (11-02-2016, 02:11 AM)fredtoast Wrote: He clearly does not disapprove of the calls. This is an unusual stance by you. So consent is to be assumed? Make sure you remain consistant in your position. I'm going to start calling folks and let them know that Hillary really doesn't care about the welfare of African Americans, she is merely practicing modern day slavery. I sure she won't disapprove, so we can say she approves. RE: White supremacist for Trump targets independent in Utah call - bfine32 - 11-02-2016 (11-02-2016, 03:07 AM)NATI BENGALS Wrote: Come on man. Just like earlier in the election process when he had to do some research before disavowing groups like the kkk. Give the man some time. He is running for president he needs people to advise him on these issues he is clueless about. Much research is needed to determine whether or not support from white nationalists slamming an opponent is ok. I will add you to those that assert lack of non-consent equals consent. I'm on the opposite side of this spectrum. RE: White supremacist for Trump targets independent in Utah call - fredtoast - 11-03-2016 (11-02-2016, 12:16 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I'm going to start calling folks and let them know that Hillary really doesn't care about the welfare of African Americans, she is merely practicing modern day slavery. I sure she won't disapprove, so we can say she approves. If you try to make these claims "in support" of Hillary I 100% guarantee tyhat she would disaprove. Go ahead and try it. I dare you. RE: White supremacist for Trump targets independent in Utah call - fredtoast - 11-03-2016 (11-02-2016, 12:16 PM)bfine32 Wrote: This is an unusual stance by you. So consent is to be assumed? Make sure you remain consistant in your position. Why would you say that this is an unusual stance for me? Anytime anyone makes a comment on behalf of another person and that person does not disavow it then, yes, it can be assumed that the person consents to that comment being made. When have I ever said anything different from this? RE: White supremacist for Trump targets independent in Utah call - bfine32 - 11-03-2016 (11-03-2016, 07:33 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Why would you say that this is an unusual stance for me? Well the article states Trump has nothing to do with the call, so I'm not sure how it could be on behalf of him (Hence was I asked has Trump approved the message) But you stance is if Trump doesn't publically disapprove then he approves. I guess not really an unusual stance for you; just an unusual stance for a rational person. RE: White supremacist for Trump targets independent in Utah call - bfine32 - 11-03-2016 (11-03-2016, 07:30 PM)fredtoast Wrote: If you try to make these claims "in support" of Hillary I 100% guarantee tyhat she would disaprove. Well only because you dared me: "I am in support of Hillary and she really doesn't care about the welfare of African Americans, she is merely practicing modern day slavery." Standing by for Hills to disapprove, but until she does she approves this. RE: White supremacist for Trump targets independent in Utah call - treee - 11-03-2016 Basket of deplorables is about as nice as you can explain it. I'm embarrassed that people are actually trying to act persecuted by that statement. RE: White supremacist for Trump targets independent in Utah call - fredtoast - 11-04-2016 (11-03-2016, 10:37 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Well only because you dared me: Hillary doers not know about this comment. You really don't understand what is going on here do you? RE: White supremacist for Trump targets independent in Utah call - fredtoast - 11-04-2016 (11-03-2016, 10:25 PM)bfine32 Wrote: But you stance is if Trump doesn't publically disapprove then he approves. I guess not really an unusual stance for you; just an unusual stance for a rational person. Actually any rational person would disavow any comments made to support him that he does not agree with. RE: White supremacist for Trump targets independent in Utah call - bfine32 - 11-04-2016 (11-04-2016, 12:13 AM)fredtoast Wrote: Actually any rational person would disavow any comments made to support him that he does not agree with. You accidentally forgot to quote the part where he had nothing to do with the call RE: White supremacist for Trump targets independent in Utah call - bfine32 - 11-04-2016 (11-04-2016, 12:05 AM)fredtoast Wrote: Hillary doers not know about this comment. How the hell do you know Hillary doesn't know about this comment? I know exactly what is going on. Hell McMullin didn't even comment on the call, so by Fred Logic: He approves of it. RE: White supremacist for Trump targets independent in Utah call - fredtoast - 11-04-2016 (11-04-2016, 12:23 AM)bfine32 Wrote: You accidentally forgot to quote the part where he had nothing to do with the call No I didn't. Just because he was not responsible does not mean he should not disapprove of the message. That is what I would do if I was running for office and the KKK started making robocalls to support me and spread wild rumors about my opponent. I would make a public statement that I want nothing to do with the KKK and I disagree with their tactics. But I can see why you would never do anything like that. RE: White supremacist for Trump targets independent in Utah call - bfine32 - 11-04-2016 (11-04-2016, 12:32 AM)fredtoast Wrote: No I didn't. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/02/us/politics/william-johnson-evan-mcmullin-robocalls-utah.html?_r=0 Quote:While the Trump campaign disavowed the robocalls, it was not the Trump campaign’s first encounter with Mr. Johnson. Quote:This year Mr. Johnson was included on a list of California delegates that Mr. Trump’s campaign submitted to the secretary of state’s office. He was later removed from the list. Hell it looks like Trump is as awesome as you think you would be. Now STFU and go color in your book. RE: White supremacist for Trump targets independent in Utah call - fredtoast - 11-04-2016 (11-04-2016, 12:52 AM)bfine32 Wrote: Hell it looks like Trump is as awesome as you think you would be. Now STFU and go color in your book. Actually I would never have submitted a white supremacist as a delegate for me in the first place. |