Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise
Snopes is... - Printable Version

+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (http://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Off Topic Forums (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Off-Topic-Forums)
+--- Forum: Politics & Religion 2.0 (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-Politics-Religion-2-0)
+---- Forum: P & R Archive (http://thebengalsboard.com/Forum-P-R-Archive)
+---- Thread: Snopes is... (/Thread-Snopes-is)

Pages: 1 2


Snopes is... - SunsetBengal - 12-22-2016

..more of a joke than anyone could have possibly imagined. Seems the people behind the site are full of sex, lies, and biased "fact checkers".

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4042194/Facebook-fact-checker-arbitrate-fake-news-accused-defrauding-website-pay-prostitutes-staff-includes-escort-porn-star-Vice-Vixen-domme.html#ixzz4TVb252HL

I wonder if Zuckerberg will now reconsider his recent decision to have Snopes moderate fake news on Facebook?


RE: Snopes is... - SunsetBengal - 12-22-2016

And, none of this to be found on the FB "sidebar".. LMAO


RE: Snopes is... - Bengalzona - 12-22-2016

Sounds like some rightwingers don't like having their facts checked. Ninja


RE: Snopes is... - SunsetBengal - 12-22-2016

(12-22-2016, 08:44 PM)Bengalzona Wrote: Sounds like some rightwingers don't like having their facts checked. Ninja


If you're going to check the "facts", at least be credible and unbiased..


RE: Snopes is... - GMDino - 12-22-2016

Oh my.  A divorced couple fighting.

Clearly they must be "biased".

Or is it the sex and the escorts?

No way they can be accurate if they have sex with escorts.

Mellow


RE: Snopes is... - SunsetBengal - 12-22-2016

(12-22-2016, 08:55 PM)GMDino Wrote: Oh my.  A divorced couple fighting.

Clearly they must be "biased".

Or is it the sex and the escorts?

No way they can be accurate if they have sex with escorts.

Mellow


Stow it, Dino.  I saw you waiting, until someone else posted first..  Doesn't take much research to find the political leanings of either of the founders..


RE: Snopes is... - GMDino - 12-22-2016

(12-22-2016, 08:58 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Stow it, Dino.  I saw you waiting, until someone else posted first..  Doesn't take much research to find the political leanings of either of the founders..

You saw me waiting?   Nervous

I clicked on this thread...opened the article in another tab (did you see that too?) and read it before responding.

Nonetheless the "political leanings" of either founders was not an issue in that article.

Carry on...


RE: Snopes is... - Bengalzona - 12-22-2016

(12-22-2016, 08:55 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: If you're going to check the "facts", at least be credible and unbiased..

Yes, because checking facts anymore clearly shows a bias thus leading someone to question the credibility of the factchecker.  Ninja


RE: Snopes is... - Rotobeast - 12-22-2016

(12-22-2016, 09:02 PM)GMDino Wrote: You saw me waiting?   Nervous

I clicked on this thread...opened the article in another tab (did you see that too?) and read it before responding.

Nonetheless the "political leanings" of either founders was not an issue in that article.

Carry on...
He sent you key-logger, embedded in a jpeg.
He sees every "stroke" you make.
Ninja

Snopes has been mildly questionable on some things, for a bit.

I'm not overly knowledgeable about it, but a friend of mine blamed the juice.
I thought O.J. was in prison though ?
Ninjax2


RE: Snopes is... - bfine32 - 12-22-2016

I know I always get a chuckle out of those that quote Snopes as a source to discredit something from the internet; as their source is always something from the internet.


RE: Snopes is... - GMDino - 12-22-2016

(12-22-2016, 10:09 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I know I always get a chuckle out of those that quote Snopes as a source to discredit something from the internet; as their source is always something from the internet.

Sounds like you don't understand how to use sources then.


RE: Snopes is... - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 12-22-2016

(12-22-2016, 08:55 PM)GMDino Wrote: Oh my.  A divorced couple fighting.

Clearly they must be "biased".

I have been told that statements from an ex during divorce proceedings are definitive proof.  That's why Bannon is an anti-Semite.  #fakenews #incosistent


RE: Snopes is... - GMDino - 12-23-2016

(12-22-2016, 11:59 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: I have been told that statements from an ex during divorce proceedings are definitive proof.  That's why Bannon is an anti-Semite.  #fakenews #incosistent

in this case did she say he was biased because of it?  No.

Swingbatterbatter.....


Snopes is... - Rotobeast - 12-23-2016

Girls......you're all pretty.




RE: Snopes is... - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 12-23-2016

(12-23-2016, 12:09 AM)GMDino Wrote: in this case did she say he was biased because of it?  No.

Swingbatterbatter.....

Dear lord, you suck at this.  


RE: Snopes is... - Dill - 12-23-2016

(12-22-2016, 09:12 PM)Bengalzona Wrote: Yes, because checking facts anymore clearly shows a bias thus leading someone to question the credibility of the factchecker.  Ninja

That makes sense, B-zona. Why would these guys be checking facts if they didn't have an agenda?

We don't need fact checkers. We just need people to all get on the right side and stop complaining!


RE: Snopes is... - Dill - 12-23-2016

(12-22-2016, 09:48 PM)Rotobeast Wrote: Snopes has been mildly  questionable on some things, for a bit.

Hard to avoid that. But it's not "mildly questionable" that will upset most people.

It's the spot on de-bunking.


RE: Snopes is... - Dill - 12-23-2016

(12-23-2016, 12:23 AM)Rotobeast Wrote: Girls......you're all pretty.


LOL didn't get this till I read it the second time.


RE: Snopes is... - Dill - 12-23-2016

(12-22-2016, 10:09 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I know I always get a chuckle out of those that quote Snopes as a source to discredit something from the internet; as their source is always something from the internet.

If they are on the internet, they are all the same.


RE: Snopes is... - Bengalzona - 12-23-2016

The real fraud in this article is...

... the wife definitely is not the same woman in the advertisement!

Then again, who is to say that anything in this article is factually correct. I'm pretty sure it won't pass the "Snopes Test". Wink