(12-24-2016, 12:08 PM)xxlt Wrote: I just saw a NY Times headline about Church World Service (CWS) staff and volunteers getting ready to welcome a family of Syrian refugees to America. My first thought was it sounded like a nice story, particularly during the Christmas/holiday season. I couldn't help wondering how many "good Christians" would be outraged by the thought of this story, even as it warmed my heart.

But more than anything I wondered what kind of crazy church was doing this. Surely, not Christian - lest those of my outraged brethren of Christian orientation have their blood boil even hotter. But, thanks to the interwebs, I learned the CWS is a cooperative ministry of 37 Christian denominations which has been providing refugee assistance around the world since just after WWII. I thought that was pretty cool, and was surprised I had never heard of CWS. So, had any of you heard of CWS before? Do you love their mission? Hate it? Tell us what you think of this organization.

(12-24-2016, 12:17 PM)GMDino Wrote: Never heard of them.

Many religious organizations do good things...usually those are the ones we don't hear about.

(12-24-2016, 01:37 PM)Bengalzona Wrote: I have heard of them before. But they are pretty 'low key'. I have to wonder if they sought out the NY Times or if the NY Times sought them out.


A wise Presbyterian pastor I know (unbelievabily enough a Steelers fan from Pittsburgh) once explained it to me this way: "It's good to go out and do good things. Just don't tell anyone that you did it. That ruins it."

(12-24-2016, 02:00 PM)GMDino Wrote: Kind of what we were taught in Catholic School.  Or at least what I got out of it.  Do what you can and do good.  That's it.

(12-24-2016, 04:16 PM)Bengalzona Wrote: If that is the main thing you took away from from Catholic School, I think Jesus would be pleased.

(12-24-2016, 04:26 PM)GMDino Wrote: Sadly, many of my fellow Christians never felt that way.  Seems I didn't ALL the messages.  

Now I'm just trying to be good whether there is a reward waiting for me or not for not doing the "right things" to get in to heaven.

Merry Christmas.

(12-28-2016, 02:11 PM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: The Church doesn't control "who" gets the help. They just provide it to those that the Government has chosen (and currently the people choosing is the UN?).

This is where I would like it fixed. I would like it or not, put a preference to Christians that are being prosecuted in ME countries ahead of Muslims. The Christians in ME Countries definitely qualify for refugee status, “well-founded fear of persecution based on religion.” I'm not saying that Muslims aren't prosecuted as well, but they are the majority and Christians are the minority and are definitely targeted.

(12-28-2016, 04:26 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: The government, not the UN but our local, state, and federal governments, determine the refugees that come in to our country. The federal grants the status and the state/local governments are the ones that provide places for them to go. The CWS, just like any private organization, cannot make that determination because immigration is controlled by the government. If people come to us seeking asylum, claiming to be refugees, then our government determines that status. Persecuted Christians from the ME would have the same opportunities to get help here if they make it here. They can apply for refugee status the same as the war refugees.

(12-28-2016, 04:35 PM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: Uhm, I was pretty sure that the UN vets them first and recommends who gets sent to the US.

http://www.newsweek.com/heres-process-refugees-have-go-through-enter-us-398254

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/report-u.s.-lets-united-nations-pick-which-syrians-come-to-america/article/2580092

(12-28-2016, 02:11 PM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: The Church doesn't control "who" gets the help. They just provide it to those that the Government has chosen (and currently the people choosing is the UN?).

This is where I would like it fixed. I would like it or not, put a preference to Christians that are being prosecuted in ME countries ahead of Muslims. The Christians in ME Countries definitely qualify for refugee status, “well-founded fear of persecution based on religion.” I'm not saying that Muslims aren't prosecuted as well, but they are the majority and Christians are the minority and are definitely targeted.

(12-28-2016, 04:26 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: The government, not the UN but our local, state, and federal governments, determine the refugees that come in to our country. The federal grants the status and the state/local governments are the ones that provide places for them to go. The CWS, just like any private organization, cannot make that determination because immigration is controlled by the government. If people come to us seeking asylum, claiming to be refugees, then our government determines that status. Persecuted Christians from the ME would have the same opportunities to get help here if they make it here. They can apply for refugee status the same as the war refugees.

(12-28-2016, 07:48 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: I guess it is a good thing Jesus didn't require religious litmus tests. 

(12-28-2016, 02:11 PM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: The Church doesn't control "who" gets the help. They just provide it to those that the Government has chosen (and currently the people choosing is the UN?).

This is where I would like it fixed. I would like it or not, put a preference to Christians that are being prosecuted in ME countries ahead of Muslims. The Christians in ME Countries definitely qualify for refugee status, “well-founded fear of persecution based on religion.” I'm not saying that Muslims aren't prosecuted as well, but they are the majority and Christians are the minority and are definitely targeted.

(12-29-2016, 09:00 PM)Dill Wrote: Actually, I'm told there are some at the gates of heaven.

(12-29-2016, 09:07 PM)Dill Wrote: So if faced with a Muslim family escaping persecution and a Christian family, and we only have space for one, we should bring in the Christians?

Would you extend this to Christians under Israel occupation on the West Bank?

(12-29-2016, 09:55 PM)THE Bigzoman Wrote: That's nice of them.

Couldn't care less what they decide to do with their resources as long as they're not harming anyone. I'm curious to know where you get this idea that the group is non-Christian because of this. Plenty of churches aid people who are less fortunate internationally, but whateves.