(01-25-2017, 10:16 AM)JS-Steelerfan Wrote: Not really, but whether he retires this year or not, his eventual retirement is inevitable, so there's no sense getting worked up either way.  

I have to chuckle a bit, though, because I remember when Bengal fans used to argue against Ben's legitimacy as a great QB (especially when compared to the almighty Carson).  Now, they're trying to get us to lament over how disastrous his retirement would be.  

(01-27-2017, 03:25 PM)rfaulk3 Wrote: In 2005 Carson was better than Ben. FULL STOP.

Overall, no. 

That's why when someone says "in 2005..." you can't come back with "time has proven us Steelers fans right." On another good team, Carson could have been a HOFer.

(02-01-2017, 10:00 PM)Dill Wrote: Well, I agree Carson was better in 2005. Classic passer.

But I have to say, Ben did very well as a rookie. Once he stepped in for Maddox, every Steeler fan could see he gave us a better chance to win. He was, indeed, clutch. And he only got better.

(02-02-2017, 10:10 AM)michaelsean Wrote: I would have given you a better chance to win. 

(02-02-2017, 07:34 PM)Dill Wrote: Perhaps you missed your shot, then. Wait, how old are you?  I'm sure Ben won't go more than 3-4 years.

(01-24-2017, 10:44 PM)6andcounting Wrote: It's Brucey's time to shine. 

(02-03-2017, 10:39 AM)michaelsean Wrote: I'm 49 and the only time I ever touched the football was if I recovered a fumble, so my window may be closed.