Posts: 16,257
Threads: 415
Reputation:
60100
Joined: May 2015
Location: Shenandoah Valley
Mood:
Just saw SCOTUS Blog tweet that effective 31 July, Kennedy is retiring.
Brett Kavanaugh's name has been rumored to be floated by Senate Republicans as a replacement.
Edit to add: Kennedy is a more right-wing Justice, though he has been a swing vote on some heavy hitting 5-4 decisions. Kavanaugh took three years to get through the process for his lower court appointment because of concerns over partisanship and it took a lot of wheeling and dealing to get him there. If he is nominated I would expect a filibuster.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
Posts: 20,138
Threads: 160
Reputation:
54695
Joined: May 2015
Location: Cincinnati
Mood: None
I'm sure the timing is political, but 30 years is plenty long to be a justice.
“History teaches that grave threats to liberty often come in times of urgency, when constitutional rights seem too extravagant to endure.”-Thurgood Marshall
Posts: 16,257
Threads: 415
Reputation:
60100
Joined: May 2015
Location: Shenandoah Valley
Mood:
(06-27-2018, 03:18 PM)michaelsean Wrote: I'm sure the timing is political, but 30 years is plenty long to be a justice.
Definitely. I don't begrudge him retirement. If Congress wasn't such a cluster I'd be absolutely fine, even with a Republican majority in the Senate. Long ago, in the days when there were established norms that actually guided things, the Senate could usually set aside the bickering and discuss reasonable jurors that would keep a decent balance on the court. I don't see that happening in this environment, but I don't think Kennedy should stay on the court just because Congress is filled with partisan morons.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
Posts: 38,881
Threads: 1,711
Reputation:
55832
Joined: May 2015
Location: SW PA
Mood:
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.
Posts: 38,881
Threads: 1,711
Reputation:
55832
Joined: May 2015
Location: SW PA
Mood:
Will we have to wait until after the November elections to have hearings on a potential replacement?
Many people say that is the way it is supposed to work.
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.
Posts: 38,881
Threads: 1,711
Reputation:
55832
Joined: May 2015
Location: SW PA
Mood:
(06-27-2018, 03:30 PM)GMDino Wrote: ![[Image: 071215_judgejeanine.jpg?itok=9VgkrTmg]](http://insider.foxnews.com/sites/insider.foxnews.com/files/styles/780/public/071215_judgejeanine.jpg?itok=9VgkrTmg)
Oh jebus...about ten minutes after I posted the above:
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.
Posts: 28,167
Threads: 40
Reputation:
122541
Joined: May 2015
Location: Parts Unknown, PA
Mood:
(06-27-2018, 04:22 PM)GMDino Wrote: Will we have to wait until after the November elections to have hearings on a potential replacement?
Many people say that is the way it is supposed to work.
If they hurry to appoint one it'll be a sign they don't think Trump can win a second term.
Posts: 20,138
Threads: 160
Reputation:
54695
Joined: May 2015
Location: Cincinnati
Mood: None
(06-27-2018, 04:27 PM)Nately120 Wrote: If they hurry to appoint one it'll be a sign they don't think Trump can win a second term.
Or that they will lose the Senate.
“History teaches that grave threats to liberty often come in times of urgency, when constitutional rights seem too extravagant to endure.”-Thurgood Marshall
Posts: 38,881
Threads: 1,711
Reputation:
55832
Joined: May 2015
Location: SW PA
Mood:
(06-27-2018, 04:27 PM)Nately120 Wrote: If they hurry to appoint one it'll be a sign they don't think Trump can win a second term.
(06-27-2018, 04:33 PM)michaelsean Wrote: Or that they will lose the Senate.
Or they are just giant hypocrites that stole a SCOTUS seat purely for political purposes.
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.
Posts: 20,138
Threads: 160
Reputation:
54695
Joined: May 2015
Location: Cincinnati
Mood: None
(06-27-2018, 04:36 PM)GMDino Wrote: Or they are just giant hypocrites that stole a SCOTUS seat purely for political purposes.
While I agree that what they did was unethical, I don't know how that relates to this.
“History teaches that grave threats to liberty often come in times of urgency, when constitutional rights seem too extravagant to endure.”-Thurgood Marshall
Posts: 10,185
Threads: 221
Reputation:
66303
Joined: May 2015
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Mood: None
(06-27-2018, 03:22 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: Definitely. I don't begrudge him retirement. If Congress wasn't such a cluster I'd be absolutely fine, even with a Republican majority in the Senate. Long ago, in the days when there were established norms that actually guided things, the Senate could usually set aside the bickering and discuss reasonable jurors that would keep a decent balance on the court. I don't see that happening in this environment, but I don't think Kennedy should stay on the court just because Congress is filled with partisan morons.
Eh. IMO, the absolute worst thing that can happen to partisan morons is for them to get everything they want. So busy smearing the other side that they forget they have to live in the world they create for themselves.
Posts: 13,243
Threads: 431
Reputation:
39547
Joined: May 2015
Location: Birdland
Mood: None
(06-27-2018, 04:25 PM)GMDino Wrote: Oh jebus...about ten minutes after I posted the above:
I don't think Republicans would accept someone nominated whose judicial experience was being a county judge for 2 years almost 3 decades ago
Posts: 20,138
Threads: 160
Reputation:
54695
Joined: May 2015
Location: Cincinnati
Mood: None
(06-27-2018, 05:00 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: I don't think Republicans would accept someone nominated whose judicial experience was being a county judge for 2 years almost 3 decades ago
But I could see him nominating someone like that. Hopefully a grown up is involved.
“History teaches that grave threats to liberty often come in times of urgency, when constitutional rights seem too extravagant to endure.”-Thurgood Marshall
Posts: 38,881
Threads: 1,711
Reputation:
55832
Joined: May 2015
Location: SW PA
Mood:
(06-27-2018, 04:37 PM)michaelsean Wrote: While I agree that what they did was unethical, I don't know how that relates to this.
Then I can't help you anymore.
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.
Posts: 38,881
Threads: 1,711
Reputation:
55832
Joined: May 2015
Location: SW PA
Mood:
(06-27-2018, 05:00 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: I don't think Republicans would accept someone nominated whose judicial experience was being a county judge for 2 years almost 3 decades ago
The accepted a POTUS with no military or political experience....
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.
Posts: 13,007
Threads: 353
Reputation:
43191
Joined: May 2015
Mood: None
Right. They accepted a Reality Show host for the highest office in the land for crying out loud.
Quote:"Success doesn’t mean every single move they make is good" ~ Anonymous
"Let not the dumb have to educate" ~ jj22
Posts: 2,136
Threads: 291
Reputation:
7221
Joined: May 2015
Location: Indiana
Mood: None
I fear Trump will nominate some far right person because he thinks that's what his base wants.
What happens if RBG retires or dies in the next year? That's my fear!
Posts: 11,916
Threads: 212
Reputation:
54048
Joined: May 2015
Location: Lancaster, PA
Mood: None
(06-27-2018, 03:18 PM)michaelsean Wrote: I'm sure the timing is political, but 30 years is plenty long to be a justice.
Is there anyone that is opposed to term limits for Supreme Court Justices (or senators or representatives)?
Posts: 20,138
Threads: 160
Reputation:
54695
Joined: May 2015
Location: Cincinnati
Mood: None
(06-27-2018, 05:41 PM)PhilHos Wrote: Is there anyone that is opposed to term limits for Supreme Court Justices (or senators or representatives)?
I think 20 years would be a fair limit.
“History teaches that grave threats to liberty often come in times of urgency, when constitutional rights seem too extravagant to endure.”-Thurgood Marshall
Posts: 37,610
Threads: 892
Reputation:
123486
Joined: May 2015
Mood: None
|