The new symbol of hate

[*PhilHos*]

(02-27-2019, 04:37 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Since the White Supremacists, Neo-Nazi's, and Klan are all on your side I think I know what you mean by "actual" racism.

Yes, they are. And those of us on the right that aren't a part of those groups (which is about 99% of those on my side) hate those groups. 

(02-27-2019, 04:37 PM)fredtoast Wrote: But it is nice to see you admitting the right is full of hate.

Glad we both recognize that the left and right is full of hate! 

[fredtoast]

(02-27-2019, 05:06 PM)PhilHos Wrote: Yes, they are. And those of us on the right that aren't a part of those groups (which is about 99% of those on my side) hate those groups. 

Too bad you all do nothing to address the reason they are all on your side.

*hint*  Instead of blaming the media get rid of the real cause.

[Vas Deferens]

(02-27-2019, 04:25 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: Or I could call out this whole thread where you demonize an 18 year old student for knocking the hat off another student's head considering you also started a thread where you defended a 40 year old slugging an 11 year old girl in the face because she "attacked him 3 times" (lol, she didn't).




Keep up the quality threads, BLucie32 

yes.  blame the parents of the 11 year old for getting cold clocked.  

lock up this kid that knocked the hat off another kid.

[*PhilHos*]

(02-27-2019, 05:16 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Too bad you all do nothing to address the reason they are all on your side.

*hint*  Instead of blaming the media get rid of the real cause.

Sure thing. Care to tell me how you're getting rid of all the hate on your side, like the Black Panthers, anti-Christian bigots, extremist Muslim terrorists, those that think it's ok to be violent to those wearing a hat, etc.? 

[*bfine32*]

(02-27-2019, 04:25 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: Or I could call out this whole thread where you demonize an 18 year old student for knocking the hat off another student's head considering you also started a thread where you defended a 40 year old slugging an 11 year old girl in the face because she "attacked him 3 times" (lol, she didn't).




Keep up the quality threads, BLucie32 

Perhaps I'll look for that thread and see where I defended the 40 year old. 

Not sure I see the correlation of the 2 incidents. I simply asked where the parents were when the 11 year old was participating in unruliness in a Shopping Mall parking lot at night and introduced this thread to try to direct traffic that is derailing other threads.

Keep up the petty insults, BmorePat87

[*bfine32*]

(02-27-2019, 05:21 PM)Vas Deferens Wrote: yes.  blame the parents of the 11 year old for getting cold clocked.  

lock up this kid that knocked the hat off another kid.

Now you have it nearer to the truth. I felt the parents of the child deserve a degree of responsibility. But bringing up past threads to try to prove a point in a present thread is poor form and speaks directly to ad hominem  attacks. 

[*bfine32*]

(02-27-2019, 05:06 PM)PhilHos Wrote: Yes, they are. And those of us on the right that aren't a part of those groups (which is about 99% of those on my side) hate those groups. 


Glad we both recognize that the left and right is full of hate! 

It is 2funny. The first post that "called me out" in the forum was how it was silly to attribute this guy's actions to the Left, but they have 0 problem lumping the Right in with hate groups.

As I've constantly said: Some folks have to justify their hate to themselves and often they try to do so with the "I'm not as bad as them" tactic. 

This forum is a smorgasbord for someone who enjoys studying the dynamic of cognitive intelligence and reasoning.  

[BmorePat87]

(02-27-2019, 05:42 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Perhaps I'll look for that thread and see where I defended the 40 year old. 

Not sure I see the correlation of the 2 incidents. I simply asked where the parents were when the 11 year old was participating in unruliness in a Shopping Mall parking lot at night and introduced this thread to try to direct traffic that is derailing other threads.

Keep up the petty insults, BmorePat87

This is where you feign ignorance even though on the first page alone you called her "the aggressor" or said she "attacked" 4 times and defended him as "defending his space" or "eliminating the threat" 3 times. How ***** pathetic is that?

[Vas Deferens]

(02-27-2019, 05:44 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Now you have it nearer to the truth. I felt the parents of the child deserve a degree of responsibility. But bringing up past threads to try to prove a point in a present thread is poor form and speaks directly to ad hominem  attacks. 

(02-27-2019, 01:18 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I have 0 problem with High School bullying being a crime.

You seem to go more along the ST. Lucie thoughts on bullying.

I admittedly don't keep up with the litany of new restrictions on what is and is not permissible in these discussions, because I honestly don't take most of this all that seriously.  But to be told its in 'poor form' to bring up someone's stated perspective in a different thread relative to the current thread, while also being compared to a different posters perspective in a previous thread; seems a bit peculiar to this member.

again.  i don't care.  but try to hold yourself to the same standards you demand of others.  

[BmorePat87]

(02-27-2019, 06:35 PM)Vas Deferens Wrote: I admittedly don't keep up with the litany of new restrictions on what is and is not permissible in these discussions, because I honestly don't take most of this all that seriously.  But to be told its in 'poor form' to bring up someone's stated perspective in a different thread relative to the current thread, while also being compared to a different posters perspective in a previous thread; seems a bit peculiar to this member.

again.  i don't care.  but try to hold yourself to the same standards you demand of others.  

looooooooooooooooool

[fredtoast]

(02-27-2019, 05:37 PM)PhilHos Wrote: Care to tell me how you're getting rid of all the hate on your side, like the Black Panthers, anti-Christian bigots, extremist Muslim terrorists, those that think it's ok to be violent to those wearing a hat, etc.? 

We can't get rid of them all, but we keep them limited to the fringe instead of electing one of them President.

Any more questions?

BTW can I see a list of the extremist Muslim terrorist that identify as Democrats?

[fredtoast]

(02-27-2019, 05:49 PM)bfine32 Wrote: It is 2funny. The first post that "called me out" in the forum was how it was silly to attribute this guy's actions to the Left, but they have 0 problem lumping the Right in with hate groups.

So just to be clear, since you have no problem attributing this guys actions to the "left" you also have no problems with the hate groups being the identity for your side, correct?

Here is what it boils down to.  You want to blame the media or someone else for Trump's MAGA hats becoming a symbol of hatred instead of blaming your Donald.  But you refuse to acknowledge that even in the arena of politics where both sides have developed a strong dislike for the other there has never been a leader like Trump who was so aggressively insulting and proud to promote violence.  When your party is embraced so openly by White Supremacist, Neo-Nazi's, and the Klan and your leader is promoting violence then any symbol of that party is going to be a lightening rod.  You can't blame that on the media.

No hat should incite violence, but anyone who wears one will be judged based on the policies that make that party so popular among racist hate groups.

[*bfine32*]

(02-27-2019, 06:32 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: This is where you feign ignorance even though on the first page alone you called her "the aggressor" or said she "attacked" 4 times and defended him as "defending his space" or "eliminating the threat" 3 times. How ***** pathetic is that?

She was the aggressor.

As I said: Keep up the petty personal insults. It does nothing but solidify the point made in the OP.

Plus, whose going to ask you to stop. That only becomes an issue when someone tries to defend themselves against attack; then it becomes personal.

I remember all the bans Lucie got because he defend he and his family against insults lodged in this very forum. 

[*bfine32*]

(02-27-2019, 07:00 PM)fredtoast Wrote: So just to be clear, since you have no problem attributing this guys actions to the "left" you also have no problems with the hate groups being the identity for your side, correct?

Here is what it boils down to.  You want to blame the media or someone else for Trump's MAGA hats becoming a symbol of hatred instead of blaming your Donald.  But you refuse to acknowledge that even in the arena of politics where both sides have developed a strong dislike for the other there has never been a leader like Trump who was so aggressively insulting and proud to promote violence.  When your party is embraced so openly by White Supremacist, Neo-Nazi's, and the Klan and your leader is promoting violence then any symbol of that party is going to be a lightening rod.  You can't blame that on the media.

No hat should incite violence, but anyone who wears one will be judged based on the policies that make that party so popular among racist hate groups.

I didn't attribute the guys actions to the left; I simply said it's becoming a symbol of hate in a perverse fashion. 


Women shouldn't wear short skirts because they will be judged.

[Mike M (the other one)]

(02-27-2019, 03:42 PM)fredtoast Wrote: If you chose to wear the hat supporting a man who promotes hatred and violence then you are going to be judged accordingly.

Wearing a hat does not justify violence, but you will be judged by who you support.

So Let me get this straight, based on what someone is wearing is how you should Judge someone even though that someone hasn't done anything to you? Sounds fair.

[*bfine32*]

(02-27-2019, 06:35 PM)Vas Deferens Wrote: I admittedly don't keep up with the litany of new restrictions on what is and is not permissible in these discussions, because I honestly don't take most of this all that seriously.  But to be told its in 'poor form' to bring up someone's stated perspective in a different thread relative to the current thread, while also being compared to a different posters perspective in a previous thread; seems a bit peculiar to this member.

again.  i don't care.  but try to hold yourself to the same standards you demand of others.  

Fair enough

[Mike M (the other one)]

(02-27-2019, 03:50 PM)fredtoast Wrote: They were both high school students.

The "adult" was cited for violating school rules.

C'mon snowflake, you are really stretching on this one.

Never said he wasn't a student.

Did I lie?

You should know the laws, and tell me you wouldn't be playing that card if it was in your favor?

[*bfine32*]

(02-27-2019, 07:44 PM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: So Let me get this straight, based on what someone is wearing is how you should Judge someone even though that someone hasn't done anything to you? Sounds fair.

Women wearing low cut blouses are asking for it. 

[BmorePat87]

(02-27-2019, 07:40 PM)bfine32 Wrote: She was the aggressor.

As I said: Keep up the petty personal insults. It does nothing but solidify the point made in the OP.

Plus, whose going to ask you to stop. That only becomes an issue when someone tries to defend themselves against attack; then it becomes personal.

I appreciate that you're no longer denying that you defended the criminal who brutally attacked a child after I counted for you how many times you did, but I don't see how pointing out that you're okay with 40 year olds punching kids helps to make the point that the left is hateful. If anything it makes people question why you are taking the opposite position in this incident where an adult is accused of assaulting a minor and using it to characterize a whole group of people. 

Also, we all know that you invoked my name first in this thread and you compared someone to Lucie first in this thread. No one is fooled by your insincerity. You can give the sob session a rest. 

Quote:I remember all the bans Lucie got because he defend he and his family against insults lodged in this very forum. 

I'm pretty sure it had more to do with him flooding the board with every single Dailywire story, constantly using slurs to refer to classes of people after being told not to, and bragging about stalking a transgender woman in his town and sharing her photo online. 

[Mike M (the other one)]

(02-27-2019, 07:49 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Women wearing low cut blouses are asking for it. 

What about people wearing trench coats? Should we shoot them before they shoot up a school?

What about people wearing hoodies?